Ind. Admin. R. Interim Rule 14
Commentary
Telephone versus Video Technology. Courts should determine on a case-by-case basis whether telephone or video technology is appropriate. Some case participants may appear by telephone, some by video, and some in person all on the same case.
Testimonial Court Proceedings. Presenting live testimony in court remains of utmost importance. For this reason, Rule 14(C) requires showings of good cause or agreement of the parties prior to allowing a remote appearance. A court must also have safeguards in place to ensure adequate identification of the witness and to protect against influences by persons present with the witness. To participate in a remote proceeding, case participants must have adequate internet service allowing for uninterrupted audio and visual transmission.
Objections. Case participants may object to a request for a remote proceeding or to a court's order setting a remote proceeding. The Rule does not place any specific deadlines or set out any procedures for objections. Courts are expected to handle objections in accordance with usual practice and procedure; however, case participants should object or indicate their ability to participate remotely as soon as reasonably possible. Guidance. The Indiana Office of Judicial Administration shall develop guidance and best practices on remote proceedings and make those available on a public website.