Rule 18.1 - Mediation in Criminal CasesIn any criminal proceeding, any party or the court may make a request for the parties to participate in mediation to resolve some or all of the issues presented in the case. Participation in mediation is voluntary and will take place only on agreement of the parties. Not all defendants in a multi-defendant case need join in the request or in the settlement conference or mediation. Decision-making authority remains with the parties and not the mediator.
Unless otherwise ordered, mediation must not stay any other proceeding.
(a) Definition of "Mediation". Mediation under this rule is the process by which a neutral mediator assists the parties (defined as the prosecuting attorney on behalf of the State and the Defendant) in reaching a mutually acceptable agreement as to issues in the case. The issues may include sentencing options, restitution awards, admissibility of evidence and any other issues which will facilitate the resolution of the case.(b) Matters Subject to Mediation. All misdemeanor and felony cases are subject to mediation if the court determines that it may be beneficial in resolving the case entirely. Issues that may be referred to mediation include, without limitation: (1) the possibility of reduced charges,(2) agreements about sentencing recommendations or possible Rule 11 agreements,(3) the handling of restitution, and(4) continuing relationship with any victim.(c) Selection of Mediator. The court must select a mediator from those on a roster maintained by the Administrative Office of the Courts, after considering the recommendations of the parties. That roster will include senior or sitting judges or justices who have indicated a willingness to conduct criminal mediations and who have completed 12 hours of criminal mediation training. If the selected mediator is a senior judge or justice, the mediator will be compensated as with any senior judge service, and approval from the trial court administrator must be obtained by the court prior to the mediation.(d) Role of the Mediator. The role of the mediator is limited to facilitating a voluntary settlement between parties in criminal cases. The mediator is to aid the parties in identifying the issues, reducing misunderstandings, exploring options and discussing areas of agreement that can expedite the trial or resolution of the case. The mediator must not preside over any future aspect of the case, other than facilitation of a voluntary settlement according to this rule. The mediator must not take a guilty plea from nor sentence any defendant in the case.(e) Persons to be Present at Mediation. Participants must be determined by the attorneys and the mediator. The government attorney participating in the settlement discussions must have authority to agree to a disposition of the case.(f) Confidentiality. Except as provided in Idaho Code § 16-1605, mediation proceedings must, in all respects, be confidential and not reported or recorded.(g) Mediator Privilege. Mediator privilege is governed by Idaho Rule of Evidence 507.(h) Communications Between Mediator and the Court. The mediator and the court must have no contact or communication except that the mediator may, without comment or observation, report to the court:(1) that the parties are at an impasse;(2) that the parties have reached an agreement, and the agreement reached may be reduced to writing, signed by the prosecuting attorney, the Defendant and defense counsel, and submitted to the court for approval;(3) that meaningful mediation is ongoing; or(4) that the mediator withdraws from the mediation.(i) Communications Between Mediator and Attorneys. The mediator may communicate with the attorneys before the mediation to become better acquainted with the current state of negotiations and the issues to be resolved in the mediation. This communication may be conducted separately with each of the attorneys and without the presence of the defendant.(j) Termination of Mediation. The court, the mediator, or any party may terminate the mediation at any time if further progress toward a reasonable agreement is unlikely or concerns or issues arise that make mediation no longer appropriate.Adopted by Order dated February 22, 2017, effective 7/1/2017; Amended by Order dated May 4, 2018, effective 7/1/2018.