Haw. R. Prof. Cond. 8.4
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
"Professional capacity" under this Rule means acts, including communications, occurring in
"Sexual harassment" under this Rule means unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and/or other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature which a reasonable lawyer would know are offensive.
Haw. R. Prof. Cond. 8.4
COMMENTS:
[1] Lawyers violate Rule 8.4(a) of these Rules, and are subject to discipline, when they attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or violate the Rules through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Paragraph (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take.
[2] Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. This is true whether or not the illegal conduct results in a criminal conviction. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation.
[3] A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of Rule 1.2(d) of these Rules concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law.
[4] Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional and ethical obligations of an attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, agent and officer, director or manager of a corporation or other organization.
[5] An attorney who is the subject of an ethics investigation or disciplinary proceeding has an ethical duty to timely cooperate with that investigation or proceeding. Examples of failure to cooperate are described in Rule 2.12 A(a) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i.
[6] Unless authorized by a court, an attorney who uses thejudiciary's electronic filing or data storage system to gain accessto confidential information filed in a case to which the attorney isnot a party and/or an attorney of record may be subject todiscipline under Rule 8.4(c) of this Rule.
[7] Lawyers have a duty to educate themselves on the social norms of the community, including what is likely to be considered sexual harassment, and to avoid such conduct.