The Investigative Panel shall consist of seven members, selected as follows:
The Hearing Panel shall consist of three members, selected as follows:
The State Bar of Georgia may recommend to the respective appointing authorities a list of individuals for consideration to serve as attorney members of the Commission. See OCGA § 15-1-21(f) (2).
R. Judi. Qual. Commi. Ga. 2
Commentary
[1] The Commission has jurisdiction over the conduct of judges that is alleged to be in violation of the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct, whether the conduct occurs on or off the bench and whether the judge is full-time, part-time, or pro tempore. To the extent that the conduct of a judge (including a judicial candidate) who is a lawyer also implicates the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct, the Commission has concurrent jurisdiction with the State Bar of Georgia.
[2] The Commission has jurisdiction over former judges to respond to complaints of misconduct that occurred before or during their service as a judge if a complaint is brought within one year following the last day of the judge's service. This continuing jurisdiction ensures that judges cannot avoid judicial discipline by resigning before information regarding their misconduct was made known to the Investigative Panel and thereafter seek judicial office with no record of misconduct, and that the Commission has jurisdiction over judicial candidates who lose elections but may seek judicial office in the future.
[3] Obviously, the Investigative Panel will exercise discretion in initiating an investigation of a former judge. Important factors the Investigative Panel may consider are the seriousness of the complaint, the likelihood that the judge will seek judicial office in the future, and the extent to which the matter can and will be appropriately handled by the State Bar of Georgia as a lawyer disciplinary matter.
[4] Suspension or removal, as authorized under Rule 6.B, may be imposed to allow the record to reflect that the judge who resigned or lost an election was determined to have engaged in conduct that warranted suspension or removal.
[5] Procedures for handling allegations against members of the Supreme Court are set out in Rule 26.
[6] The composition of the Commission, including its membership, appointing authorities, terms of office, and provisions for removal or vacancy of members, was previously determined in part by the Constitution and in part by the Commission Rules. These matters are now determined by statute. See OCGA § 15-1-21. Each category of Commission members (judges, attorneys, and citizens) should be represented on the Commission and its panels in order to balance viewpoints.