Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 52
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
This rule is substantially similar to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, as amended in 2007 and 2009, but maintains the following local distinctions in subsection (a)(1): 1) the parties can expressly waive the requirement that the court state its findings of fact and conclusions of law in a nonjury action; 2) the phrase "after the close of evidence" has been deleted to permit the court to make partial findings and conclusions as the case progresses; and 3) the findings and conclusions need only state the controlling grounds for the decision.
Consistent with the federal rule, the 10-day deadline for parties to file post-judgment motions has been expanded to 28 days. This was necessitated by the Rule 6(b) prohibition on an extension of this deadline. The change is intended to give parties more time to prepare a satisfactory post-judgment motion while maintaining certainty in appeal times.
COMMENT
Identical to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52 except that section (a) has been revised to eliminate the requirement of stating findings of facts and conclusions of law in non-jury actions where the necessity of making the same is expressly waived by the parties and to indicate that such findings and conclusions may be written or oral and need only state the controlling grounds of decision. These provisions are necessitated by the time demands of a massive volume of litigation and are designed to insure that all litigants who desire it receive a fair and adequate statement of the grounds of decision applied in their case while at the same time making clear that such statements of fact and law need not be unduly lengthy nor presented in written form if the Court prefers to dictate them from the bench.