Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 7
COMMENT TO 2017 AMENDMENTS
This rule was rewritten and expanded to provide more detailed procedures to self-represented parties. Also, in order to be more easily understood by self-represented parties, section (i) uses the term "vacate" in place of the term "rescind," which is used in D.C. Code § 16-1005(d) (2017 Supp.). When the court is considering a motion to vacate in the absence of either party, the court should consider, among other things, the circumstances surrounding the case, the demeanor of the party, and safety factors in the particular case.
Sections (g) and (h), addressing motions to modify and to extend, now reflect the determination in Adams v. Ferreira, 741 A.2d 1046 (D.C. 1999) (explaining that, under D.C. Code § 16-1005, a civil protection order could only be extended, rescinded, or modified by motion of a party to the original proceeding, not on the court's own initiative).
Sections (j) and (k) are modeled after Civil Rule 60, but have been modified to reflect practice in the Domestic Violence Unit. Where these sections are substantially similar to the civil rule, case law interpreting the civil rule is expected to apply. Under District of Columbia Court of Appeals Rule 4, the timely filing of a motion to reconsider may impact the time for filing a notice of appeal.
Motions for contempt are addressed in Rule 14.