Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 54-II
COMMENT TO 2023 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been substantially amended and reorganized to implement the Expanding Fee Waivers for Low-Income Litigants Amendment Act of 2022, D.C. Law 24-246, 69 D.C. Reg. 14603 (February 23, 2023), D.C. Code § 15-712. Among other things, the amendments significantly expand the circumstances under which litigants may qualify for an automatic fee waiver under D.C. Code § 15-712(a)(1). The qualifying health care benefits formerly listed in section (c) have been included in the list of qualifying financial assistance programs cited in subsection (b)(1). Section (g) remains substantively the same, but has been reorganized for clarity and includes new subsection (g)(2) regarding incomplete fee waiver applications. Amended section (h) includes new statutory deadlines for deciding fee waiver applications. New subsection (j)(2) implements a new statutory option for applicants to request a hearing if denied a fee waiver. Section (k) has been amended to permit those approved for a fee waiver to request other documents, in addition to free transcripts, as necessary to resolve Superior Court proceedings, as well as appeals. Section ( l ) is a new provision implementing new confidentiality requirements in D.C. Code § 15-712(d). Section (m) is also a new provision implementing filing fee limitations in D.C. Code § 15-712(e). Finally, minor amendments have been made to other sections to align with the new language of D.C. Code § 15-712.
To the extent D.C. Code § 15-712 includes procedural rules, the Court has adopted them pursuant to its exclusive rulemaking authority under D.C. Code § 11-946. See Woodroof v. Cunningham , 147 A.3d 777 (D.C. 2016).
COMMENT TO 2019 AMENDMENTS
Section (b) was amended to permit the clerk to grant applications when the applicant receives Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, General Assistance for Children, Program on Work, Employment, and Responsibility, or Supplemental Security Income.
COMMENT TO 2018 AMENDMENTS
This rule was amended consistent with stylistic changes to the civil rules.
COMMENT TO 2010 AMENDMENT
D.C. Code § 15-712 governs in forma pauperis applications. There is no Federal Rule of Civil Procedure addressing such applications, but 28 U.S.C. § 1915 does. The District of Columbia statute, unlike the federal statute, does not provide the court with discretion to deny an application for in forma pauperis based upon the merit of the underlying action. Compare D.C. Code § 15-712 with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see In re Turkowski, 741 A.2d 406, 407 (D.C. 1999) (per curiam) ("the court must grant the request for in forma pauperis status if a proper application is made, and, having done so, thereafter treat the case as any other, including, of course, any appropriate dispositive actions"); accord Lewis v. Fulwood, 569 A.2d 594, 595 (D.C. 1990) (per curiam).
The Rule requires applicants seeking in forma pauperis status to submit their request utilizing Form 106A (Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Costs, Fees or Security), which includes citations to pertinent statutes and case law.
Subsection (k) sets forth the standards for ruling upon a motion for free transcripts. See, e.g., P.F. v. N.C., 953 A.2d 1107, 1119 (D.C. 2008) (noting that an appellant proceeding in forma pauperis is entitled to a free transcript "if the trial judge... certifies that the appeal is not frivolous" and that "[d]oubts about [the] substantiality of the questions on appeal and the need for a transcript to explore them should be resolved in favor of the petitioner") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Hancock v. Mut. of Omaha Ins. Co., 472 A.2d 867 (D.C. 1984), as discussed in P.F. , 953 A.2d at 1119.
The Rule is stylistically consistent with Civil Rule 54 -II, which is stylistically consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.