Sup. Ct. R. D.C. 4
COMMENT TO 2022 AMENDMENTS
Subsection (c)(2) was amended to provide greater flexibility for plaintiffs and petitioners to accomplish service. New subsection (c)(2)(I) permits service using the court's electronic filing system. New subsection (c)(2)(J) (former subsection (c)(3)(B)) now permits electronic service without requiring leave from the court and includes a non-exhaustive list of examples of electronic service methods. The language of former subsection (c)(3)(C) related to service by posting on the court's website was moved to subsection (c)(4)(D). Subsection (c)(6) was amended consistent with the addition of subsection (c)(2)(I) and (J). Subsection (h)(3) was amended to specify how proof of service is to be made for electronic service under new subsection (c)(2)(J) and former subsections (c)(4) and (c)(5) were redesignated accordingly.
In domestic relations cases, service at the defendant's place of employment under subsection (c)(3) may raise substantial privacy concerns and create a significant risk of unfair prejudice at the workplace. The court should take these factors into account in deciding whether to authorize service at the defendant's place of employment and should consider whether the imposition of any special conditions or requirements may provide greater protection of the defendant's privacy or make the defendant's receipt of actual notice of the case more likely. Safeguards the court should consider include, but are not limited to, requiring that the papers be served in a sealed envelope marked confidential" and that the process server's affidavit specify the name and title of the person with whom the papers were left.
COMMENT TO 2018 AMENDMENTS
This rule has been amended to conform to the general restyling of the civil rules. The rule was also reorganized and expanded. While the rule is modeled after Civil Rule 4, the provisions concerning the method and proof of service reflect the statutes governing service in domestic relations cases, including cases involving child support and parentage.
Consistent with Civil Rule 4, subsection (a)(1)(D) now requires the summons to include the date and time of the initial hearing in a new case. Unlike Civil Rule 4, subsection (a)(1)(D) also requires the summons to state the time by which the defendant must file a response to a complaint so that self-represented defendants are aware of their obligation to file a written response to a complaint as well as to appear at the initial hearing.
Subsection (a)(1)(E) was added to require the summons to specify that not only a failure to answer on a timely basis but also a failure to appear at the initial or other scheduled hearing may result in entry of a default judgment against a defendant.
Subsection (b)(2)(B) was added to provide for issuance of a Notice of Hearing and order Directing Appearance ("NOHODA") if the court orders a hearing on a motion for contempt or a post-disposition motion. This provision was moved from Rule 7 and amended to reflect the fact that the court would schedule the hearing.
Subsection (d)(2) provides for service of a NOHODA by certified mail, return receipt requested, and first-class mail. However, D.C. Code § 46-206(b)(2) (2012 Repl.) provides that "[s]ervice by certified mail that is unclaimed or refused and first-class mail alone shall not be a sufficient basis to permit the entry of a default order of paternity in a case where the respondent fails to file an answer or otherwise fails to respond appropriately." See also Rule 55(b)(2)(B)(i) (requiring compliance with D.C. Code § 46206(b) for entry of default parentage order).
Subsection (c)(2)(C) was added consistent with Civil Rule 4(c)(5) to authorize service by first-class mail with notice and acknowledgement and to include a related cost-shifting provision if the defendant does not appear or respond.
New subsection (c)(2)(H) permits the parties to agree to other methods of service. New subsection (c)(3) authorizes alternative methods of service if the court makes the appropriate determination. Among the alternative methods listed are service by electronic means or posting on the court's website.
Finally, subsection (i)(2) now requires a party to file a motion if the party wants more time to serve. The provision allowing the clerk to grant one 60-day extension was deleted because it is unnecessary and created practical problems.
COMMENT
Subparagraph (a)(2) of this Rule provides for the use of a Notice of Hearing and Order Directing Appearance (NOHODA) in cases initiated by petition. Pursuant to SCR-General Family H, this process is signed by the Clerk of the Division and has the same force and effect as a civil subpoena. In cases seeking to establish paternity, D.C. Code § 46-206(b) permits personal service of the NOHODA by a combination of first class and certified mail. Such service is not, however, a sufficient basis for issuance of a bench warrant for failure of the defendant to appear.
Paragraph (i) incorporates the Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents, and other applicable international agreements on service of process. The applicability of an international agreement on service of process in a foreign country should be checked before other methods of service are attempted.
Where a party has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the 60-day time period in which proof of service of process must be filed under paragraph (l) will start to run at the time the summons is issued by the Clerk. See SCR-Dom. Rel.54(f). For waiver of prepayment of costs, including filing fees, see SCR-Dom. Rel. 54(f).