Del. R. Evid. 504
Comment
This rule is based on U.R.E. 504 which is based on draft of F.R.E. 505. See comment to Rule 501.
Rule 504(a) tracks U.R.E. 504(a), but was amended in 2017 to clarify that "spouse" includes a former spouse.
Rule 504(b) provides that an individual may testify for or against a spouse in civil as well as criminal cases. This rule removes the common law disability against 1 spouse testifying against the other. Such testimony is permitted unless the testimony involves a confidential and a privilege is asserted as to it.
Rule 504(c) generally tracks U.R.E. 504(b).
Rule 504(d) provides that an individual may claim the privilege on their own behalf and is presumed to have authority to claim the privilege on behalf of their spouse.
Rule 504(e) generally tracks U.R.E. 504(d) except that "wrong" appears instead of "crime" and Rule 504(d)(5) excludes the privilege in proceedings under Title 9 and Chapter 9 of Title 10 of the Delaware Code.
For prior Delaware cases illustrating the law covered by this rule, see Mole v. State, Del. Supr., 396 A.2d 153 (1978); State v. Thompson, Del. Super., 136 A.2d 336 (1957); Duonnolo v. State, Del. Supr., 397 A.2d 126 (1978).
D.R.E. 504 was amended in 2017 in response to the 2011 restyling of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The amendment is intended to be stylistic only. The pre-2017 "Comment" to D.R.E. 504 was revised only as necessary to reflect the 2017 amendments. There is no intent to change any result in ruling on evidence admissibility.