Ark. R. Civ. P. 65
Reporter's Notes to Rule 65:
1. Rule 65 marks a significant departure from FRCP 65. Whereas the latter makes a distinction between preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders, this rule treats them equally insofar as the procedures are concerned for obtaining either remedy. Thus, where it appears from affidavit or verified complaint that irreparable harm will or might result, the court has the authority to issue a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order without notice to the opposing party. Under FRCP 65, notice is always a requirement for the issuance of a preliminary injunction.
2. This rule (a)(1) is generally in accord with prior Arkansas law. Superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-201 (Repl. 1962) provided that the court could direct that reasonable notice be given to the party against whom an injunction was sought. Superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-202 (Repl. 1962) required mandatory notice when a defendant had already answered and superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-103 (Repl. 1962) provided for the issuance of a temporary injunction without notice in certain instances as where irreparable harm was threatened. However, superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-203 (Repl. 1962) provided that in a number of specific instances, notice was required on an application for a preliminary injunction. This rule (a)(1) is designed to simplify prior Arkansas law by providing for the issuance of a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order without notice only where it appears that irreparable harm or injury will or might result. In all other instances, notice of such application is required. Rule (a)(2) requires prior notice and a bond before a preliminary restraining order or injunction may be effective as against designated businesses.
3. Section (b) is designed to afford a hearing to the person against whom an injunction or temporary restraining order has been issued without notice. Substantial rights are often affected and for this reason, such hearings should be heard as expeditiously as possible. Where the hearing is held on the right of the applicant to have an injunction or restraining order issued, the court may delay the hearing until the entire case can be heard on the merits. Where harm may result, however, from such delay, the better practice is to proceed with the hearing on such application.
4. Section (d) deviates substantially from the security provisions of the Federal Rule and also changes prior Arkansas law. Under this rule, the trial court is vested with discretion to determine when security is required and the amount of such security when required. Both FRCP 65 superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-206 (Repl. 1962) require the posting of adequate security as a condition precedent to the issuance of a preliminary injunction; therefore, this section does modify prior Arkansas law. Under this rule, preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders are placed on equal footing and since the trial court is in the best position to know whether security should be required, it is given the discretion to make such a determination.
5. Section (e) is identical to FRCP 65(d) and is designed to insure specificity in the drafting of injunctions and restraining orders. The intent is to ensure that there is no doubt or confusion as to the conduct enjoined or restrained. Likewise, this section makes clear the identity of all persons who are bound by the injunction or order. This provision should have little effect on Arkansas practice and procedure.
6. Section (e) of FRCP 65 is omitted and Section (f) is added to this rule. The latter section simply provides that disobedience of any injunction or order may be treated as a contempt by the court. Prior Arkansas law in this area was codified as superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 32-401 (Repl. 1962) although it is doubtful that specific statutory authority was necessary to enable the court to punish one for violating the terms of an injunction or restraining order.
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 2011 Amendment: Rule 65 has been completely rewritten and is now substantially identical to Federal Rule 65 as amended in 2009. Rule 65 as adopted in 1979 departed significantly from the corresponding federal rule. Contrary to the approach of the federal rule and that of most states, the original Arkansas Rule 65 treated preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders as equivalent, allowing issuance of either without notice to the adverse party. Subsections (a) and (b) of the amended rule provide for issuance of a temporary restraining order without notice to the adverse party but require notice to the adverse party prior to issuance of a preliminary injunction.
The amendment eliminates former subsection (a)(2) that limited the availability of ex parte injunctive relief in some circumstances. The revised rule provides a number of enhanced procedural protections for persons or entities against whom ex parte injunctive relief is sought, including: that an affidavit or verified complaint state specific facts showing the harm that will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard; that the movant's attorney certify in writing any efforts made to give notice and why notice should not be required; that a temporary restraining order issued without notice describe the circumstances underlying its issuance; that the temporary restraining order must expire not later than 14 days after entry unless for good cause or with the adversary's consent it is extended; and that the hearing on the temporary restraining order be set for the earliest possible time and take precedence over other matters. In addition, the party against whom the order is issued may appear and move to dissolve or modify the order upon 2 days' notice to the party who obtained the temporary restraining order without notice.
In subsection (c) the amended rule conditions issuance of a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order on the movant's giving security determined by the court and section (d)(1) prescribes the contents of the injunction or restraining order. Subsection (d) specifies the persons bound by the order.
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 2023 Amendment: The addition of subsection (e) clarifies that Rule 65 's procedures apply when seeking emergency relief unless they conflict with a statutory provision governing the terms under which emergency relief may be granted.