Alaska R. P. Ch. Need 17

As amended through May 30, 2024
Rule 17 - Disposition
(a)Purpose of Hearing. The purpose of a disposition hearing is to determine the appropriate disposition of a child who has been adjudicated a child in need of aid. A disposition hearing concerning the termination of parental rights is governed by CINA Rule 18.
(b)Statements. The parties may offer evidence in aid of disposition at the hearing. The court shall afford the parties, any grandparents of the child who are in attendance at the hearing, and any foster parents or other out-of-home care providers an opportunity to be heard.
(c)Requirements for Disposition. A disposition hearing may not be held before adequate information is available upon which to enter an informed disposition order. If the child has been placed outside the home, the court cannot enter a disposition order if the court finds (1) in cases involving a non-Indian child, that the Department has failed to make reasonable efforts as required by AS 47.10.086(a) to permit the child's return to the home, unless the court has determined under Rule 17.1 that reasonable efforts are not required; or (2) in cases involving an Indian child, that the requirements of 25 U.S.C. § 1912(d) (active efforts) have not been met.* If the court finds that the Department has failed to make required reasonable efforts or that the requirements of 25 U.S.C. § 1912(d) have not been met, the court must postpone entering a disposition order until the court finds that reasonable efforts or active efforts have been made. The child should remain in temporary custody pending disposition.
(d)Findings.
(1) A disposition order must be accompanied by findings of fact.
(2) The court may approve the removal of the child from the child's home only if the court finds that continued placement in the home is contrary to the welfare of the child; and, in cases involving an Indian child, that there is clear and convincing evidence, including the testimony of qualified expert witnesses, that custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child.
(e)Evidence. Hearsay which is not otherwise admissible under a recognized exception to the hearsay rule may be admissible at the disposition hearing and in review of a disposition order if the hearsay is probative of a material fact, has circumstantial guarantees of trustworthiness, and the appearing parties are given a fair opportunity to meet it.
(f)Disposition Order-Subsequent Proceedings. If the court orders the child committed to the Department under AS 47.10.080(c)(1), the disposition order must set the date for the permanency hearing required by AS 47.10.080(l). If the court releases the child under AS 47.10.080(c)(2), the disposition order must set the date for filing the report on annual review.

Alaska R. P. Ch. Need 17

SCO 845 effective 8/15/1987; amended by SCO 1010 effective 1/15/1990; by SCO 1355 effective 7/15/1999; and by SCO 1465 effective 4/15/2002

Ch. 43, SLA 2001, amends AS 47.10.030, AS 47.10.070(a), and AS 47.10.080(f) to add provisions concerning notice to and participation by grandparents. According to § 6 of the Act, these provisions have the effect of amending Child in Need of Aid Rules 3, 7, 10, 15, 17, and 19 by requiring that grandparents be given notice of and an opportunity to be heard at certain child-in-need-of-aid proceedings.

* Note: As of June 1999, it is an open issue whether federal law permits a trial court to determine that active efforts are not required in a case or that such efforts may be discontinued.