For the purpose of this chapter:
Note: In Muench v. Public Service Commission, 261 Wis. 492 (1952), the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a stream is navigable in fact if it is capable of floating any boat, skiff or canoe of the shallowest draft used for recreational purposes. In DeGayner and Co., Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources, 70 Wis.2d 936 (1975), the court also held that a stream need not be navigable in its normal or natural condition to be navigable in fact. The DeGayner opinion indicates that it is proper to consider artificial conditions, such as beaver dams, where such conditions have existed long enough to make a stream useful as a highway for recreation or commerce, and to consider ordinarily recurring seasonal fluctuations, such as spring floods, in determining the navigability of a stream.
Note: Where the bank or shore of any particular place is of such character that it is difficult or impossible to ascertain where the point of ordinary high-water mark is, recourse may be had to the opposite bank of a stream or to other places on the shore of a lake or flowage to determine whether a given stage of water is above or below the ordinary high-water mark.
Note: The water level in a glacial pothole lake may remain above the "ordinary high-water mark" several years after flooding, resulting in a "high-water mark" which is above the "ordinary high-water mark." However, there would be no practical difference between the "high-water mark" of a glacial pothole lake and the "ordinary high-water mark" of a glacial pothole lake where the effects of such flooding are no longer evident.
Wis. Admin. Code Department of Natural Resources NR 117.03