Figure 23
Synthetic Fiber Rope Slings
Note: | An external code mark on the sling is an acceptable means of recording the inspection as long as the code can be traced back to a record. |
Table 23
Synthetic Rope Sling Inspection and Removal Criteria
Inspect synthetic ropeslings for the followingconditions: | Perform inspections: |
* Missing or illegible sling identification; | |
* Cuts, gouges, or areas of extensive fiber breakage along the length; | |
* Abraded areas on the rope; | * At least once a year for slings in normal service; |
* Damage that is estimated to have reduced the effective diameter of the rope by more than 10%; | * At least once a quarter for slings in severe service; |
* Uniform fiber breakage along the major part of the length of the rope in the sling such that the entire rope appears covered with fuzz or whiskers; | * As recommended by a qualified person for slings in special service. |
* Inside the rope, fiber breakage, fused or melted fiber (observed by prying or twisting to open the strands) involving damage estimated at 10% of the fiber in any strand or the rope as a whole; | |
* Discoloration, brittle fibers, and hard or stiff areas that may indicate chemical, ultraviolet or heat damage; | |
* Dirt and grit in the interior of the rope structure that is deemed excessive; | |
* Foreign matter that has permeated the rope, making it difficult to handle and attracting and holding grit; | |
* Kinks or distortion in the rope structure, particularly if caused by forcibly pulling on loops (known as hockles); | |
* Melted, hard, or charred areas that affect more than 10% of the diameter of the rope or affect several adjacent strands along the length that affect more than 10% of strand diameters; | |
* Poor condition of thimbles or other components manifested by corrosion, cracks, distortion, sharp edges, or localized wear; | |
* Hooks that have any of the following conditions: | |
- Any visibly apparent bend or twist from the plane of the unbent hook; | |
- Any distortion causing an increase in throat opening 5%, not to exceed one-quarter inch, or as recommended by the manufacturer; | |
- Wear exceeding 10%, of the original section dimension of the hook or its load pin, or as recommended by the manufacturer; | |
- Self-locking mechanism that does not lock. | |
* Other visible damage that raises doubt about the safety of the sling. |
Table 24
Synthetic Rope Sling Proof Load Requirements
Type of equipment: | Proof load test: |
* Single leg slings; * Multiple leg slings; * Endless slings; * Fittings attached to single legs. | To a minimum of two times the single leg vertical hitch rated load. |
Master links for two-leg bridle slings. | To a minimum of 4 times the single leg vertical hitch rated load. |
Master links for 3-leg bridle slings. | To a minimum of 6 times the single leg vertical hitch rated load. |
Master links for 4-leg bridle slings. | To a minimum of 8 times the single leg vertical hitch rated load. |
Note: | Rated loads are based on the following factors: |
* Strength of the sling material; | |
* Design factor; | |
* Type of hitch (see Figure 24, Hitch Types for Synthetic Rope Slings); | |
* Angle of loading (see Figure 18, Angle of Loading); | |
* Diameter of curvature over which the sling is used (see Figure 19, D/d Ratio). |
Figure 24
Hitch Types for Synthetic Rope Slings
The symbols below represent load or support in contact with the rope sling. The contact surface diameter divided by the rope diameter is designated D/d ratio as described in Figure 19.
Note: | Legs 5 degrees or less from vertical may be considered vertical. For slings more than 5 degrees vertical, the actual angle must be used. |
Wash. Admin. Code § 296-155-55815
Statutory Authority: RCW 49.17.010, 49.17.040, 49.17.050, 49.17.440, 49.17.060, and 29 C.F.R. 1926, Subpart CC. 12-01-086, § 296-155-55815, filed 12/20/11, effective 2/1/12.