Okla. Admin. Code § 455:10-9-2

Current through Vol. 41, No. 19, June 17, 2024

Section 455:10-9-2 - Hearing

(a)Purpose. The hearing provides each party the opportunity to present witnesses and evidence in support of his or her respective case for decision by an Administrative Law Judge. Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the Oklahoma Personnel Act, the Administrative Procedures Act and the rules in this chapter.

(b)Party responsibility. Each party shall be present, on time and prepared. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the appeal or other sanctions unless good cause is shown.

(c)Representation. Each party to the appeal may have a representative to speak and act on his or her behalf.

(d)Administrative Law Judge responsibility. The Administrative Law Judge shall rule on questions of admissibility of evidence, competency of witnesses and any other matters or questions of law.

(e)Process. The hearing shall be formal, structured by the Administrative Law Judge and open to the public. Parts of a hearing may be ordered closed when evidence of a confidential nature is to be introduced or where to do so would be in the best interests of a party, witness, the public or other affected persons. The Administrative Law Judge shall record the hearing by digital recording and such recording shall constitute the official recording of the hearing.

(1)Notice. Each party shall be notified of the date, time and location at least 7 calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing.

(2)Location. The hearing shall be held at the Commission offices or any other location determined appropriate. At the prehearing conference any party may request the hearing be changed to a more convenient location. The Administrative Law Judge shall rule on the request and may change the location when to do so is in the best interests of the Commission and parties. The Administrative Law Judge shall be compensated for travel, per diem and other associated costs by the appointing authority if the location is changed at his or her request.

(3)Witnesses. Each party may call witnesses who have been approved by the Administrative Law Judge to offer testimony and evidence. The Administrative Law Judge shall administer an oath or affirmation to the witness and may question the witness at any stage of the hearing.

(4)Continuance. A request for continuance shall be filed in accordance with OAC 455:10-3-17 normally no less than 3 calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing. A lesser period of time may be permitted for good cause shown. The Administrative Law Judge shall rule on the request and in no case shall a combination of continuances of the hearing exceed a total of 30 calendar days except for good cause shown.

(f)Burden of proof. The following burdens of proof shall also apply to appeals heard through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program as well as the hearing process.

(1) Adverse action appeal. The burden of proof shall be upon the appointing authority who must prove his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence.

(A) Upon a finding that just cause existed for the adverse action and the discipline imposed was just, a presiding official shall affirm the decision of the appointing authority.

(B) Upon a finding that just cause did not exist for the adverse action, a presiding official may order the reinstatement of the employee, with or without back pay and other benefits. A presiding official may also order that documentation of the adverse action be expunged from any and all of the employee's personnel records.

(C) Upon a finding that just cause existed for the adverse action, but did not justify the severity of the discipline imposed, a presiding official may order reduction of the discipline or other corrective action. A presiding official shall, as a minimum, consider the following circumstances in ordering the reduction of discipline: the seriousness of the conduct as it relates to the employee's duties and responsibilities; the consistency of action taken with respect to similar conduct by other employees of the agency; the previous employment and disciplinary records of the employee; and mitigating circumstances.

(D) A presiding official who orders reinstatement with back pay and other benefits under (B) or (C) above, may consider the deduction of any income the employee may have received for the period of time the employee was not performing his or her duties.

(2)Alleged violation appeal. The burden of proof shall be upon the appellant who must prove his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence. Upon a finding that a violation within the Commission's jurisdiction did occur, a presiding official may order the appointing authority to take the necessary corrective action or report the findings to any other appropriate authorities for further action. Corrective action shall be limited to issues submitted for decision, shall be consistent with applicable statutes and rules and shall be limited to action which makes the person harmed by the violation whole as if the violation had not occurred.

(3)Payroll claim protest. In payroll claim protests of overpayment, the burden of proof shall be upon the appointing authority who must prove his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence. In payroll claim protests of underpayment, the burden of proof shall be upon the appellant who must prove his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence. The presiding official may determine the amounts paid or not paid in error; determine dates of overpayments or underpayments; determine options available for repayment; affirm the protest of the appellant; affirm the decision of the appointing authority and order corrective action.

(g)Order of procedure. The party with the burden of proof shall present his or her case first and the opposing party may respond. A presiding official shall have the authority to alter the order of procedure. This order of procedure also applies to appeals heard through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Program.

(h)Summary judgment. The Administrative Law Judge may decide appeals based on summary judgment when there is no dispute as to either material fact or inferences to be drawn from undisputed facts, or if only question of law is involved.

Okla. Admin. Code § 455:10-9-2

Amended and renumbered from 455:10-5-5 at 13 Ok Reg 3025, eff 7-15-96; Amended at 17 Ok Reg 2560, eff 6-26-00; Amended at 19 Ok Reg 2376, eff 7-1-02; Amended at 26 Ok Reg 559, eff 3-1-08 through 7-14-09 (emergency)¹; Amended at 26 Ok Reg 2690, eff 7-25-09

Amended by Oklahoma Register, Volume 33, Issue 24, September 1, 2016, eff. 9/11/2016

¹This emergency action expired before being superseded by a permanent action. Upon expiration of an emergency amendatory action, the last effective permanent text is reinstated. Therefore, on 7-15-09 (after the 7-14-09 expiration of the emergency action), the text of 455:10-1-2 reverted back to the permanent text that became effective 7-1-02, as was last published in the 2006 Edition of the OAC, and remained as such until amended again by permanent action on 7-25-09.