Okla. Admin. Code § 310:531-7-4

Current through Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1, 2024

Section 310:531-7-4 - Summary removal

(a) If in the course of an investigation the Department determines that a vision screening provider has engaged in conduct of a nature that is, or is likely to be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and which conduct necessitates immediate action to prevent such harm, the Commissioner may order summary removal of the name of the vision screening provider from the registry for vision screening maintained by the Department pending the Department filing a petition to remove the name of the vision screening provider from the registry following an individual proceeding pursuant to the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S. §§ 309 et seq . A presumption of imminent harm to the public shall exist if the Department determines that probable cause exists that a vision screening provider has harmed, or threatened harm to, a child while providing vision screening services. The order of summary removal from the registry must include the specific grounds for the summary removal, a citation of the statute or law allegedly violated, and inform the vision screening provider of the process to request a hearing to contest the summary action.

(b) Any vision screening provider whose name has been summarily removed from the registry for vision screening may request a hearing to contest such summary action. The Department shall have the initial burden of persuasion to show that the provider has engaged in conduct that has caused, or is likely to cause, harm to a child. If the Department meets this burden of persuasion, the vision screening provider has the burden to prove that the conduct of the provider in providing vision screening services would not harm a child.

(c) If in the course of an investigation the Department determines that a vision screening trainer has engaged in conduct of a nature that is, or is likely to be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the public, and which conduct necessitates immediate action to prevent such harm, the Commissioner may order summary removal of the name of the vision screening trainer from the list for vision screening trainers maintained by the Department pending the Department filing a petition to remove the name of the vision screening trainer from the list following an individual proceeding pursuant to the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act, 75 O.S. §§ 309 et seq . A presumption of imminent harm to the public shall exist if the Department determines that probable cause exists that a vision screening trainer has harmed, or threatened harm to, a child while providing vision screening services. The order of summary removal from the list must include the specific grounds for the summary removal, a citation of the statute or law allegedly violated, and inform the vision screening trainer of the process to request a hearing to contest the summary action.

(d) Any vision screening trainer whose name has been summarily removed from the list for vision screening trainers may request a hearing to contest such summary action. The Department shall have the initial burden of persuasion to show that the trainer has engaged in conduct that has caused, or is likely to cause, harm to a child. If the Department meets this burden of persuasion, the vision screening trainer has the burden to prove that the conduct of the trainer in providing vision screening services would not harm a child.

Okla. Admin. Code § 310:531-7-4

Added at 26 Ok Reg 2036, eff 6-25-09; Amended at 27 Ok Reg 2526, eff 7-25-10

Amended by Oklahoma Register, Volume 31, Issue 24, September 2, 2014, eff. 9/12/2014