N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9, Appendices, app Q-8
LAND USE AREA CLASSIFICATION DETERMINANTS
Many criteria and determinants are used in land use planning. Some are common to any planning process. Others vary with the area for which the plan is to be prepared. The needs of inhabitants, the region, and of society define those determinants that receive primary emphasis.
The determinants used in preparing this Land Use and Development Plan were chosen to identify those areas in the park best suited for development. The determinants fall into the following basic categories:
The natural resource determinants identify those areas that are physically most capable of sustaining development without significant adverse impact. Such determinants as soils, topography, water, vegetation and wildlife have been inventoried and analyzed to assure the protection of the basic elements of the park. Existing land uses must also be carefully considered in the planning process, particularly because they are important determinants of the park's present and future character. These determinants identify the historic patterns of the park's growth and indicate the types of growth that have been and are presently viable. Future development contemplated under the plan must also be considered in light of its relation to existing development.
The Legislature has found that there is a State interest in the preservation of the Adirondack Park, and therefore a variety of public consideration determinants have been analyzed in the preparation of this plan. In general, public consideration determinants help identify areas that must be protected in order to preserve the essential open space character of the park. These areas may be considered important from a public standpoint for such reasons as their location near important State lands or their present use in an open space condition. Additionally, there may be a substantial State interest in preserving certain critical public considerations.
The following determinants were used in the land area classification process. The land use implications paragraph is a general indication of the manner in which these determinants were utilized in preparing the plan:
Description: Soil with a high-water content or seasonal high-water table less than 1 1/2feet from the surface.
Land use implications: Onsite wastewater treatment systems will not function adequately and may pollute groundwater supplies. There may also be a problem of flooded basements, backed-up toilets, broken pavements, cracked walls and similar situations. These problems may lead to community health hazards, environmental problems, inconvenience and economic hardship. Severe developmental limitations exist in those areas that contain a high proportion of poorly drained or seasonally wet soils. Such areas are capable of sustaining development at only a very low level of intensity.
Description: Soils with a seasonal high-water table 1 1/2 to 4 feet below the surface.
Land use implications: A potential for onsite wastewater treatment system failure or groundwater pollution exists. The New York State Department of Health recommends that the bottom of a onsite wastewater treatment system, tile field be 18 to 30 inches below the soil surface at final grade, with a minimum depth of two feet between the bottom of the tile field and the water table. Special precautions must also be taken to avoid washouts where deep road cuts are necessary. An occasional problem for roads, streets and parking lots on this soil is the "washboard" effect caused by frost heaving. Although these soils can tolerate a higher level of development than can poorly drained soils, moderate development limitations still exist.
Description: Soils with a depth to the seasonal high-water table of more than four feet.
Land use implications: Areas containing well-drained soils present only slight development limitations. Generally, this type of soil can adequately filter the effluent from onsite wastewater treatment systems and poses few other construction problems.
Description: Soils with a permeability rate of less than one inch per hour.
Land use implications: Soils with low permeability characteristics present severe development problems. Onsite wastewater treatment systems may overflow, causing pollution of surface water. Street, road and parking lot surfaces heave, and building walls and foundations tend to crack. Sanitary landfills may cause acute problems when located on soils with these characteristics.
Description: Soils with a permeability rate of one inch per 30 to 60 minutes.
Land use implications: Problems experienced in soils with this characteristic are similar to, but slightly less severe than, problems experienced with soils of low permeability. In general, adequately designed and engineered onsite wastewater treatment systems, roads and structures help solve the problems that these soils can cause, but these alternatives tend to be expensive. Areas containing a high percentage of these soils should not be developed at a high level of intensity.
Description: Soils with a permeability rate of more than one inch per 30 minutes.
Land use implications: Generally, these soils present only slight development limitations, and they can handle a relatively intense level of development. However, excessive permeability may create a potential for the pollution and contamination of groundwater and nearby uncased wells if onsite wastewater treatment systems are employed.
Description: Soils with a depth to bedrock of less than one and 1 % feet.
Land use implications: These soils present severe development constraints. Massive excavation costs are necessary to do even minimal development. Onsite wastewater treatment systems are not possible under these conditions, as soil depths are not sufficient to provide adequate filtration of effluent. Community sewage systems can only be installed at a prohibitive cost. Shallow soils also present substantial road and building construction problems. These soils should not be developed.
Description: Soils with a depth to bedrock of 1 I/2 to 4 feet.
Land use implications: These soils present moderate development limitations. Onsite wastewater treatment problems can arise with effluent flowing directly over the bedrock into nearby drainages or groundwater supplies. The more shallow portions of these soils result in increased excavation costs. Intense development should not occur in these areas.
Description: Soils with a depth to bedrock of more than four feet.
Land use implications: Relatively intense development can occur on these soils.
Description: Soils with over 35 percent coarse fragments less than three inches in diameter.
Land use implications: These soils present development problems. Excavation for such purposes as onsite wastewater treatment systems, homesites with basements, and streets and roads is costly and difficult. Soils with this description affect the rate at which water moves into and through the soil. The difficulty of establishing a good vegetative ground cover can cause erosion problems. Generally, intense development should be avoided on soils of this nature.
Description: Areas with slopes of over 25 percent.
Land use implications: These slopes should not be developed. Development on these slopes presents serious environmental problems. Erosion rates are greatly accelerated. Accelerated erosion increases siltation. Septic systems will not function properly on these slopes. Development costs are likely to be massive because of the special engineering techniques that must be employed to ward off problems such as slipping and sliding. Proper grades for streets are difficult to attain and often can only be accomplished by large road cuts.
Description: Areas with slopes of 16 to 25 percent.
Land use implications: These slopes present substantially the same environmental hazards relating to erosion, sewage disposal, siltation and construction problems as are found on severe slopes. However, if rigid standards are followed, some low intensity development can take place.
Description: Areas with slopes of not greater than 15 percent.
Land use implications: Such slopes can be developed at a relatively intense level, so long as careful attention is given to the wide slope variability in this range. Construction or engineering practices that minimize erosion and siltation problems must be utilized on the steeper slopes in this range.
Description: Gorges, waterfalls, formations and outcroppings of geological interest.
Land use implicatons: These features represent scarce educational, aesthetic and scientific resources. Construction can seriously alter their value as such, particularly where it mars the landscape or the formations themselves. Consequently, these areas should be developed only at extremely low intensities and in such a manner that the unique features are not altered.
Description: Areas above 2,500 feet.
Land use implications: These areas should ordinarily not be developed. They are extremely fragile and critical watershed storage and retention areas that can be significantly harmed by even a very low level of development intensity.
Description: Periodically flooded land adjacent to a water body.
Land use implications: These areas should not be developed. Periodic flooding threatens the safety of residents and the destruction of structures. Development that would destroy the shoreline vegetation would result in serious erosion during flood stages. Onsite wastewater treatment systems will not function properly and will pollute both surface and ground waters.
Description: Lands within one-half mile of designated wild and scenic rivers or of designated study rivers that presently meet the criteria for eventual wild or scenic designation.
Land use implications: The New York State Legislature has found that these lands constitute a unique and valuable public resource. Consequesntly, these lands should not be developed in order to protect the rare resource of free flowing waters with essentially primitive shorelines.
Description: Wetlands where there is found a grass-like vegetative cover and a free interchange of waters with adjacent bodies of water.
Land use implications: These areas present severe developmental limitations. Continual flooding makes onsite wastewater treatment impossible and construction expensive. The filling of these areas will destroy the most productive ecosystem in the park and will lower their water retention capacity. Therefore, these areas should not be developed.
Description: Sphagnum, heath or muskeg vegetation underlaid with water and containing rare plant and animal communities that are often of important scientific value.
Land use implications: These areas should not be developed. They are sensitive areas whose delicate ecological balance is easily upset by any change in water level or the addition of any pollutants.
Description: Areas generally above 4,300 feet exhibiting tundra-like communities.
Land use implications: These areas should not be developed. The vegetative matter in these areas cannot withstand any form of compaction or development. These communities are extremely scarce in the park.
Description: Areas of abrupt change from one ecosystem to another, giving rise to extraordinary plant and animal diversity and productivity.
Description: Old-growth natural forests on highly productive sites, including those natural areas identified by the Society of American Foresters.
Land use implications: These areas deserve protection and should, therefore, be developed only at a low level of intensity. Intense development of these areas would destroy illustrative site types, including vestiges of primitive Adirondack conditions deemed important from both scientific and aesthetic standpoints.
Description: Areas containing rare plant communities, including those identified by the State Museum and Science Services.
Land use implications: These areas should not be developed. Development, even at a very low level of intensity, would modify the habitat of these plants and thereby cause their possible extinction in New York State.
Description: Habitats of species of wildlife threatened with extinction either in New York State or nationwide.
Land use implications: These areas should not be developed. Development at even a low level of intensity would modify the habitats of these species and thereby cause their possible extinction in New York State or nationwide. These small areas are often the survival link for entire species.
Description: Important deer wintering yards, waterfowl production areas and bodies of water containing native strains of trout.
Land use implications: These areas can sustain only a very limited level of development intensity without having a significant adverse affect on the wildlife. Development at greater intensities would alter the habitats, thus making them unsuitable for continued use by wildlife. Development also increases the vulnerability of these critical areas.
Description: Area viewed from the 40 Adirondack Park vistas identified in the State Land Master Plan.
Land use implications: The intensity of development should vary with the distance from the vista with the purpose of protecting the open-space character of the scene. Development within one-quarter mile of the vista will have a substantial visual impact on this character and should be avoided. Between one-quarter mile and five miles, a low intensity of development will not damage the open-space appearance, whereas intense development would. Relatively intense development beyond five miles will not damage the scene so long as it does not consist of large clusters of buildings or industrial uses.
Description: Presently undeveloped areas adjacent to and within sight of public highways.
Land use implications: Travel corridors play an important role in establishing the park image to the majority of park users. Unscreened development within these areas would be detrimental to the open-space character of the park. The allowable intensity of development should not be allowed to substantially alter the present character of these travel corridors.
Description: Sites of historic significance from a local, park or national standpoint.
Land use implications: Any development of the site itself or its immediate environs, except restoration, would destroy the site's historical and educational values.
Description: Areas served by a public sewer system.
Land use implications: Development may occur in these areas in spite of certain resource limitations that have been overcome by public sewer systems. Consequently, these areas can often be used for highly intensive development.
Description: Areas identified in a county comprehensive sewerage study where public sewer systems are considered feasible.
Land use implications: Encouraging relatively intense development in these areas will often provide the necessary impetus to establish the proposed systems. These systems will overcome certain health hazards and associated environmental problems that would otherwise be considered limiting.
Description: Areas of primarily residential development.
Land use implications: The primary use of these areas should continue to be residential in nature.
Description: Large tracts, primarily of northern hardwood or spruce-fir forests, under active forest management.
Land use implications: These areas should be developed at only a very minimal level of intensity. They constitute a unique natural resource. The supply of these species of trees, which are uncommon in such quantities elsewhere in the State, is important to insure a continuing supply of saw-logs and fiber for the economically vital wood-using industry of the region.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9, Appendices, app Q-8