(c)Reapprove review.Except as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision, commencing on January 15, 1997, the commissioner shall review and, if appropriate, reapprove in whole or in part each approved program, including the provision of evaluation services, in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision.
(1) The reapproval review of an approved program shall not be conducted more than once every three years, unless the commissioner shall determine, on his own initiative or at the request of a municipality, that a reapproval review of such program is required earlier or more frequently.(2) The commissioner shall conduct such reapproval review in accordance with the departments ongoing quality assurance procedures, including schedules, in order to determine that the program under review provides quality services in a necessary and cost-efficient manner and in the least restrictive environment. In reaching such determination, the commissioner shall consider factors which include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) the percentage of children receiving services from the approved program which also conducted the initial evaluation of the child which was used to determine the child's eligibility for preschool special education programs and services;(ii) whether there has been evidence of misleading or erroneous advertising;(iii) the extent of progress in meeting the goals of the approved business plan;(iv) evidence to document that the program has reduced the numbers of students served in settings which do not provide opportunity for interaction with age-appropriate peers without disabilities;(v) whether the approved program or program component is in compliance with Federal and State law and regulations relating to the provision of special education programs and services for preschool students with disabilities;(vi) cost-effective program size;(vii) samples of materials and procedures to provide information and training to parents and opportunities which encourage parent participation and involvement in the program;(viii) the number and type of parent complaints, if any, regarding the program and review of the resolution of such issues; and(ix) for purposes of reapproving a program component, (a) the extent to which the program offers services in settings with regular contact with age-appropriate peers, where appropriate to the needs of the population served and (b) whether there has been evidence of misleading or erroneous advertising.(3) At least 30 days prior to completion of the reapproval review, the municipality in which the program under review is located or for which the municipality bears fiscal responsibility shall be given an opportunity to submit written comments to the commissioner concerning the program under review.(4) Upon his or her initial determination that the program or program component under review has failed to meet the criteria for reapproval specified in paragraph (2) of this subdivision, the commissioner shall provide the program under review with written notice of such determination, together with the specific findings underlying such determination and, if applicable, recommended corrective and/or remedial actions.(5) Within 30 days of its receipt of such notice, the program under review may submit a written response which shall include: (i) a challenge of such findings together with sufficient evidence to establish that the program is in compliance; and/or(ii) a proposed corrective action plan that is sufficient to correct and/or remedy each finding within a reasonable time, provided that the program submits a reasonable explanation for not immediately correcting and/or remedying such findings.(6) After receipt and consideration of such response, or after expiration of the 30 day time period without submission of a response, the commissioner shall: (i) reapprove the program or program component at issue, if sufficient evidence exists to establish that the program or component is in compliance; or(ii) place the program on a corrective action plan sufficient to correct and/or remedy each outstanding finding within a specified time. A program placed on a corrective action plan shall provide the commissioner with requested information and reports on a timely basis to demonstrate compliance with each outstanding finding within the time frame specified in the plan;(iii) if placement of the program on a corrective action plan is not feasible because the nature of the findings precludes corrective or remedial action, the commissioner shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (8) of this subdivision.(7) If a program placed on a corrective action plan corrects or remedies each outstanding finding within the time frame specified in such plan, the commissioner shall issue reapproval of the program or component at issue.(8) If a program placed on a corrective action plan fails to correct or remedy such findings within the time specified in such plan, or if a corrective action plan was found to be infeasible pursuant to subparagraph (6)(iii) of this subdivision, the commissioner shall disapprove such program or component at issue and provide the program under review with written notice of such disapproval, including the specific findings underlying such determination.(9) Within 30 days of its receipt of the notice of disapproval, the program may appeal such disapproval by submitting written material to the commissioner which responds to the findings specified in the notice and presents the program's position and all evidence and information which the program believes is pertinent to the case.(10) After considering the evidence submitted by the department and the institution pursuant to the appeal, the commissioner shall issue a final determination on whether such program or component shall be disapproved.