The department was asked whether an individual serving as a fiduciary under a will or trust instrument may open a checking account at a State-chartered savings bank or savings and loan association. The department was also asked whether an individual may open a checking account in the form of a "totten trust".
The department responded that an individual fiduciary for an individual beneficiary could maintain a demand deposit at a mutual institution, if such trust is not for a business purpose and subject to compliance with Banking Law Section 237.1. The department also replied that demand deposits could be maintained in the form of totten trusts.
Section 237.2 of the Banking Law, as recently amended, prohibits a savings bank from accepting "any deposit for credit to a municipal corporation or for credit to any partnership, corporation, association or other organization for profit, or any demand deposit for credit to any depositor except a natural person". Section 380.13 of the Banking Law, as amended, imposes a similar restriction upon savings and loan associations.
The quoted language would cleraly prohibit a corporate fiduciary from opening a checking account at a mutual institution. It would also prohibit an individual who serves as trustee for a corporate account from opening a checking account, since the corporation would be the beneficial owner of the funds. The issue, therefore, is whether the language quoted would permit an individual serving as a fiduciary for another individual to open a checking account at a mutual institution. This, in turn, depends upon the Legislature's intent when it adopted Sections 237.2 and 380.13 of the Banking Law. Sections 237.2 and 380.13 were enacted by Chapter 225 of the Laws of 1976. The language of the two sections was derived, in large measure, from the language contained in A. 11147/S. 8626, which was a Banking Department bill which included checking as well as personal loan powers. During the Legislature's consideration of A. 11147 and of A. 12452-A, which was subsequently enacted as Chapter 225 of the Laws of 1976, the Banking Department repeatedly emphasized that the bills would not affect the commercial banks' monopoly on commercial checking accounts and that the bills were not intended to permit mutual institutions to offer checking accounts for business or commercial uses. The department also stated that checking account powers would further the restructuring of the thrift industry and would be the first of the steps necessary toward the transformation of thrift institutions into family banking centers.
An examination of relevant provisions of law suggests that certain trusts do not constitute business instruments and that the trustees of those trusts may open a checking account with a mutual institution without violating the purpose of Section 237.2, as understood by the Legislature. More specifically:
Former subdivision 1 of Section 237, repealed in 1971, set a ceiling on the amount of deposit which a savings bank could accept from "any person". The statute excluded certain sums from such deposits, including
At the time former subdivision 1 was repealed, subdivision 2 of Section 237 was renumbered subdivision 1. The renumbered subdivision 1 specifically permits certain kinds of trustees to open an account in the name of the trustee. The subdivision reads as follows:
"No savings bank shall accept any deposit for credit to any executor, administrator, trustee, committee or guardian, named in a will or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction, unless a certified copy of the will, order or decree of the court authorizing such deposits or appointing such executor, administrator, trustee, committee or guardian, or a certificate of such appointment is filed with the savings bank."
Presumably, the current version of subdivision 1 of Section 237 was retained to insure that trust funds be counted separately, as provided in former subdivision 1 of Section 237.
DATED: November 1976
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 3 § LI 4.18