The opinion shall specifically state whether or not the financial advisor, in arriving at its conclusions as to the fairness of the proposed consideration has made efforts to determine whether, in its judgment, there is the reasonably significant probability that financially able purchasers of the character generally capable of securing regulatory approval other than the proposed acquiror, given an opportunity, might have made good faith offers to purchase control of the converting institution for a consideration materially greater than that proposed to be paid by the proposed acquiror, and has compared the consideration to be paid by the proposed acquiror with the consideration paid in the purchase of other thrift institutions of comparable size, market area, profit history, competitive conditions and projected future earnings. If the financial advisor has made any such efforts or any such comparisons, the nature and scope of such efforts and comparisons shall be discussed in detail. The written opinion shall state whether and on what basis the financial advisor believes that the consideration to be paid by the proposed acquiror exceeds the aggregate amount of net proceeds which the converting institution could have realized if the capital stock to be sold to the proposed acquiror had been sold in a subscription offering followed by an underwritten public offering. The written opinion shall be delivered to the Banking Department before any approval of the application for conversion will be granted by the superintendent.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 3 § 86.6