(Tax Law, section 208(9)(r), (s) and (t))
Example 1: A retail clothing business located in New York submits an application for a loan from a qualified community bank on February 1, 2021. The bank determines that, during the 2020 tax year, the business had an average number of 30 employees, and that for the same tax year the business's gross receipts were $3 million and its assets consisted entirely of inventory (valued at $75,000) and bank deposits (valued at $25,000). The bank further determines that the business is not part of an affiliated group. The loan is a qualifying loan for purposes of this subtraction modification.
Example 2: The business in example 1 submits an application for a second loan from the same community bank on February 1, 2022. The bank determines that, during the 2021 tax year, the business had an average number of 40 employees, and that for the same tax year the business's gross receipts were $4 million. The bank further determines that for the 2016 tax year the business was part of an affiliated group; and that during that tax year the members of the affiliated group together had an average number of 90 employees, and total gross receipts were $9 million. The loan is a qualifying small business loan for purposes of this subtraction modification.
Example 3: A partnership submits an application for a loan from a qualified community bank on February 1, 2022. The bank determines that, during the 2021 tax year, the partnership had no employees and its gross receipts were $2 million for the year. The bank also determines that its assets consist of corporate stock that has an average value equal to $40 million and land that has an average value equal to $10 million. The partnership holds the corporate stock for investment. The partnership is not an active business because more than 50% of its assets are financial investments. Therefore, the loan is not a qualifying loan for purposes of this subtraction modification because it is not a small business loan.
Example 4: Jane Smith, a resident of New York, submits an application to a small thrift for a residential mortgage loan of $1 million to purchase a second home in Massachusetts. Ms. Smith will use both the Massachusetts property and her primary residence in New York to secure the mortgage loan. At the time the loan is originated, the FMV of the New York property is $700,000 and the FMV of the Massachusetts property is $300,000. Since more than 50% of the loan is secured by real property in New York, the entire loan is considered secured by real property in New York. As such, the loan is a qualifying loan for purposes of this subtraction modification.
N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 20 §§ 3-3.3