Separation/dehydration facilities essentially remove water, natural gas liquids, and other impurities from the gas stream. The natural gas liquids are temporarily stored in fixed-roof storage tanks with vapor recovery systems until transported offsite by rail, tank truck or pipeline to a gas processing plant. Water will be disposed of either by deep well injection or by trucking to an approved offsite disposal location.
Basic siting criteria requires up to 50 acres of fairly level land, with 20-30 acres intensively utilized and the remaining acreage serving as a buffer zone around the plant. Additionally, easy access to either highway and/or railroad facilities is desirable.
Once ashore, the gas will continue through the pipeline to a separation and dehydration facility and then to the interstate transmission line. It is not expected that the pressure losses due to friction and presence of natural gas liquids and water in the gas stream will be sufficient to require compression of Mid-Atlantic natural gas. However, if they are required, it is feasible to place them anywhere along the pipeline corridor.
These facilities, however, do not require locations on the shoreline. If the amount of liquids separated from the gas stream is minimal, the liquids can be trucked or transported by rail to existing facilities which could process these liquids. A gas processing plant may induce the location and/or expansion of chemical plants since gas and its byproducts often provide the feedstock for the petrochemical industry.
To promote the most efficient use of land, gas processing plants could be located close to existing interstate natural gas transmission pipelines. Alternatively, where natural gas is associated with oil and oil pipelines, gas processing plants should be located close to refineries to which the oil pipeline will be routed. Thus, gas processing plants which are economically and technically feasible and which do not exceed new source and performance standards regarding air and water quality are conditionally acceptable in the Delaware River and Northern Waterfront areas.
New Jersey's coastal zone, especially along Barnegat Bay and Delaware Bay, has experienced the consequences of several major siting decisions in the past decade and already has a diverse mix of existing, proposed, and potential fossil fuel and nuclear generating facilities, both onshore and offshore.
New Jersey recognizes the interstate nature of the electric power system. Some electricity is produced in New Jersey at facilities owned partially by utilities in other states and exported to those states. New Jersey also imports electricity produced in adjacent states. In short, New Jersey is an integral part of the Pennsylvania- New Jersey- Delaware-Maryland interconnecting grid system, importing and exporting electricity from the system at different times of the day, season and year in order to generate electricity efficiently and achieve the lowest achievable cost to electricity users throughout this multi-state region.
New Jersey also recognizes that most electric generating facilities may not be coastal-dependent but do require access to vast quantities of cooling waters, a siting factor that, from the perspective of utilities, increases the attractiveness of coastal locations. This siting rule strikes a balance among various competing national, regional, and state interests in coastal resources, and recognizes some of the differences in the siting requirements of fossil fuel and nuclear generating stations.
The rule directs fossil fuel stations toward built up areas in order to preserve and protect particularly scenic and natural areas important to recreation and open space purposes. New Jersey has articulated this policy with a conscious recognition of the state's progress in attaining and maintaining high air quality. Given the use of appropriate control technology, coal-fired generating stations, for example, appear feasible at various coastal locations. The siting of coal-fired power plants in urban areas also promotes efficient energy use due to the proximity of power plants to load centers.
The nuclear siting rule recognizes public concern for the disposal of spent fuel, as mandated in CAFRA by the New Jersey Legislature in 1973 and left unchanged in the 1993 legislative amendments.
The State recognizes the responsibilities of various federal agencies, including the U.S. Coast Guard and Office of Pipeline Safety Operations in the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Economic Regulatory Administration in the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE), and the independent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission within USDOE, for management of various aspects of the siting and operations of LNG facilities.
Importation facilities for LNG are discouraged in view of the present sources of LNG from politically unstable counties. The use of natural gas for base load electric generation purposes is consistent with the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, P.L. 95-620. The availability of domestic sources of LNG and a demonstrated need that such importation facilities are in the national interest dictate considering applications for such facilities on a case by case basis.
The tankering, transfer, and storage of LNG pose significant risks to Public health, safety and welfare and may cause serious adverse environmental impacts which may not be restricted to one state, given the likely potential locations of LNG terminals along interstate waterway. New Jersey therefore recommends that the siting of LNG facilities be treated as a regional issue on an interstate basis.
N.J. Admin. Code § 7:7-15.4