Potential water column impacts vary with each type of dredging method employed, that is, mechanical or hydraulic. Mechanical methods have been documented to release more suspended sediments at the dredging site than hydraulic methods. Hydraulic dredging causes greater mixing of sediments with water which is an important consideration when dredging contaminated sites, since slurry water is usually released into the water body.
Previously dredged areas typically accumulate black muds high in clay and silt, detritus, and other organics and, if sources are present, toxic heavy metals, petroleum, and chlorinated hydrocarbons. The majority of potentially toxic contaminants are closely bound to fine grained sediment particles and may or may not be available for uptake by aquatic organisms. Bioaccumulation testing is necessary to determine if there is contaminant uptake.
Presently available equipment and operational practices can contain or reduce off site movement of suspended particles. Efficiency and applicability of control equipment depends on hydrologic conditions at the site.
The information available on aquatic species responses and/or mortality due to dredge-induced water quality changes is incomplete. It is known however that egg and larval forms of aquatic biota are more sensitive than adult stages. American oyster eggs and larvae are known to be sensitive to turbidity levels and durations that typically occur at mechanical dredging sites. Turbidity is known to block upstream migration of striped bass. Turbidity may, therefore, block other anadromous species during spring upstream migration.
Little information exists on the resuspension of fecal bacteria in contaminated sediments. The potential exists that a dredging turbidity plume could carry fecal bacteria into harvestable shellfish beds or human bathing beaches. This may result in unacceptable human health hazards.
Aquatic finfish and blue crabs which winter in New Jersey's estuarine and tidal waters are lethargic at cold water temperatures. Large scale mechanical or hydraulic dredging could entrain and kill significant numbers, since they would not be able to evacuate a dredging area.
Reprofiling is generally prohibited under this chapter because it merely moves dredged material rather than removing it from the system. Ultimately, this material is likely to have to be removed, resulting in handling the material twice and increasing the impacts associated with the movement of the accumulated sediment. Reprofiling is acceptable under limited circumstances as an interim measure in the New York-New Jersey Harbor Area when other management techniques are unavailable, as it will allow existing maritime uses to continue operation while a more permanent solution is sought.
Propwash dredging is indiscriminate, releasing sediment into the water column with no control to minimize impacts on water quality, or control of the fate of the resuspended sediment. Sediment resuspended in this manner could smother shellfish beds, submerged vegetation habitats, and result in the loss of navigability in adjacent berths and channels. Thus propwash dredging is prohibited under these rules.
N.J. Admin. Code § 7:7-12.6