(b) The receipts of the taxpayer are to be computed on the cash, accrual, or other method of accounting used in computation of its net income for Federal income tax purposes. However, the numerator and denominator of the receipts fraction must, in any event, relate to the entire net income recognized during the period covered by the return. Example 1:
Taxpayer is engaged in long-term construction contracting. It has elected to recognize income for tax purposes on the completed contract method of accounting whereby it recognizes the net income on its contracts in their entirety in the year of completion.
The composition of the receipts fraction must be determined in harmony with the entire net income to which it relates. The numerator and denominator of the receipts fraction must reflect the entire contract revenues on completed contracts recognized in entire net income during the period covered by the return.
Example 2:
Taxpayer recognizes income on a sale for tax purposes on the installment method.
The numerator and denominator of the receipts fraction should include the same proportion of the sale as is prorated as recognized income to the year covered by the return.
(d) The receipts sourced to a state, a possession or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia or to any foreign country in which the taxpayer is not subject to a tax on or measured by profits or income or business presence or business activity shall be excluded from the denominator of the sales fraction. This principle applies to single entity taxing jurisdictions, as well as post-apportionment combination states. The rule also permits the throwout of receipts to pre-apportionment combination states. Receipts from pre-apportionment combination states are not required to be thrown out of the denominator of the New Jersey receipts fraction if they create a potential tax in a foreign state. For purposes of this subsection, "pre-apportionment combination states" are those states where the receipts from all states are added together before the apportionment factor is calculated. "Post-apportionment combination states" are those where the various apportionment factors are calculated first then totaled. If a taxpayer believes that application of the throwout rule in a particular situation produces an improper allocation, the taxpayer may avail itself of the prescribed avenues to request the Director's discretionary adjustment of the allocation factor pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:10A-8. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for privilege periods beginning on or after July 1, 2010, the receipts sourced to a state, a possession or territory of the United States or the District of Columbia, or to any foreign country in which the taxpayer is not subject to a tax on or measured by profits or income or business presence or business activity are not required to be excluded from the denominator of the sales fraction found in N.J.S.A. 54:10A-6(B). Example: ABC Inc., a New Jersey corporation, manufactures goods in New Jersey. It also maintains an office in Philadelphia. Eighty percent of ABC Inc.'s payroll and property are in NJ. It sells 30 percent of its goods to NJ customers; 30 percent to PA customers; and 40 percent to customers in other states. ABC Inc. files returns and pays tax to NJ and PA only. It is not subject to tax in other states due to the protection of P.L. 86-272. ABC Inc. has entire net income of $ 1,000,000.
For tax year 2001, beginning 1/1/01, and ending 12/31/01, its allocation factor is:
Click here to view
For tax year 2001, beginning 1/1/01, and ending 12/31/01, its allocation factor is:
Click here to view