Section Env-Wq 2006.04 - Scoring Based on Completeness and ClarityEach application shall be scored on its completeness and clarity as follows:
(a) An application shall be scored on its executive summary as follows: (1) An application that includes a clear and descriptive executive summary shall receive one point; and(2) An application that fails to include a clear and descriptive executive summary shall receive no points;(b) An application shall be scored on how well it describes the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project as follows:(1) An application in which the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project are clearly presented and which demonstrates direct applicability to NHCP focus areas shall receive 4 points;(2) An application in which the purpose, objectives, and need for the proposed project are not clearly described or which demonstrates indirect applicability to NHCP focus areas shall receive 2 points; and(3) An application in which the purpose, objectives and need for the proposed project are not clearly presented or which demonstrates no applicability to NHCP focus areas shall receive no points;(c) An application shall be scored on how well it describes project tasks as follows: (1) An application in which project tasks are practicable and clearly described, and which identifies who will complete each portion of the proposed work, shall receive 2 points; and(2) An application in which project tasks are not practicable, or clearly described, or which does not identify who will complete each portion of the proposed work, shall receive no points;(d) An application shall be scored on its inclusion of a project schedule as follows: (1) An application that includes a clear implementation plan with dates for completion of project milestones that are achievable within the allotted time period shall receive 2 points; and(2) An application that does not include a clear implementation plan with dates for completion of project milestones that are achievable within the allotted time period shall receive no points;(e) An application shall be scored on its inclusion of a budget and matching fund justification as follows:(1) An application in which the budget and matching fund justification are complete and practicable based on the stated objectives, tasks, and time frame shall receive 3 points; and(2) An application in which the budget and matching fund justification are not complete and practicable based on the stated objectives, tasks, and time frames shall receive no points;(f) An application shall be scored on how well it describes anticipated project outcomes as follows: (1) An application that describes specific, tangible results that are consistent with the project objectives shall receive 3 points; and(2) An application that does not describe specific, tangible results that are consistent with the project objectives shall receive no points;(g) An application shall be scored on how well it measures success as follows: (1) An application that includes an assessment strategy that will effectively measure results and completion of the project objectives shall receive 2 points; and(2) An application that does not include an assessment strategy that will effectively measure results and completion of the project objectives shall receive no points; and(h) An application shall be scored on its inclusion of all submission requirements as follows: (1) An application that includes all application submission requirements set forth in Env-Wq 2004.04 or Env-Wq 2004.06,as applicable, shall receive 2 points; and(2) An application that does not include all application submission requirements set forth in Env-Wq 2004.04 or Env-Wq 2004.06, as applicable, shall receive no points.N.H. Admin. Code § Env-Wq 2006.04