PURPOSE: This amendment will correct rule citations due to amendments to 10 CSR 60-4.050 and 10 CSR 60-4.094 and the rescission of 10 CSR 60-4.090.
where:
V = the percentage of time that the disinfectant residual is less than the required residual;
a = the value in subparagraph (4)(A)3.A. of this rule;
b = the value in subparagraph (4)(A)3.B. of this rule;
c = the value in subparagraph (4)(A)3.C. of this rule;
d = the value in subparagraph (4)(A)3.D. of this rule; and
e = the value in subparagraph (4)(A)3.E. of this rule.
If you are... | You must report...1 |
System monitoring for chlorite under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4.094(2)(A) 3. | (1) The number of samples taken each month for the last three (3) months. (2) The location, date, and result of each sample taken during the last quarter. (3) For each month in the reporting period, the arithmetic average of all samples taken in the month. (4) Whether the MCL was exceeded, and in which month it was exceeded. |
System monitoring for bromate under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4M4(2)(A)4. | (1) The number of samples taken during the last quarter. (2) The location, date, and result of each sample taken during the last quarter. (3) The arithmetic average of the monthly arithmetic averages of all samples taken in the last year. (4) Whether the MCL was exceeded. |
1The department may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the MCL was exceeded, in lieu of having the system report that information.
If you are... | You must report...1 |
System monitoring for chlorine or chloramines under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4.094(2)(A) 1. | (1) The number of samples taken during each month of the last quarter. (2) The monthly arithmetic average of all samples taken in each month for the last twelve (12) months. (3) The arithmetic average of all monthly averages for the last twelve (12) months. (4) Whether the MRDL was exceeded. |
System monitoring for chlorine dioxide under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4M94{2){K)2. | (1) The dates, results, and locations of samples taken during the last quarter. (2) Whether the MRDL was exceeded. (3) Whether the MRDL was exceeded in any two consecutive daily samples and whether the resulting violation was acute or nonacute. |
1The department may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the MRDL was exceeded, in lieu of having the system report that information.
If you are... | You must report...1 |
System monitoring monthly or quarterly for TOC under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4.094(2)(B) 1. and required to meet the enhanced coagulation or enhanced softening requirements in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 3. | (1) The number of paired (source water and treated water, prior to continuous disinfection) samples taken during the last quarter. (2) The location, date, and result of each paired sample and associated alkalinity taken during the last quarter. (3) For each month in the reporting period that paired samples were taken, the arithmetic average of the percent reduction of TOC for each paired sample and the required TOC percent removal. (4) Calculations for determining compliance with the TOC percent removal requirements. (5) Whether the system is in compliance with the enhanced coagulation or enhanced softening percent removal requirements for the last four (4) quarters. |
System monitoring monthly or quarterly for TOC under the requirements of 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) and meeting one or more of the alternative compliance criteria in 10 CSR60-4.094(3)(C) 1. or (3)(C)2. | (1) The alternative compliance criterion that the system is using. (2) The number of paired samples taken during the last quarter. (3) The location, date, and result of each paired sample and associated alkalinity taken during the last quarter. (4) The running annual arithmetic average based on monthly averages (or quarterly samples) of source water TOC for systems meeting a criterion in 10 CSR 60- 4.094(3)(C) 1.A or (3)(C)1.C. or of treated water TOC for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 1.B. (5) The running annual arithmetic average based on monthly averages (or quarterly samples) of source water SUVA for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 1.E. or of treated water Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance (SUVA) for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 1.C and of treated water alkalinity for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 2. (7) The running annual average for both TTHM and HAAS for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 1.C or (3)(C)1.D. (8) The running annual average of the amount of magnesium hardness removal (as CaCO3, in mg/L) for systems meeting the criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 2.B. (9) Whether the system is in compliance with the particular alternative compliance criterion in 10 CSR 60-4.094(3)(C) 1. or (3)(C)2. |
1The department may choose to perform calculations and determine whether the treatment technique was met, in lieu of having the system report that information.
10 CSR 60-7.010
*Original authority: 640.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1978, 1981, 1982, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2006.