It is a specific purpose of this rule to restrict or condition the issuance of shares of a professional corporation and the issuance of membership interests in a professional limited liability company which is to advertise or otherwise hold itself out to be an architect or to be authorized to practice architecture to only licensed architects or engineers.
Firm and business names are considered improper if they contain the name or names of individuals actively licensed in another jurisdiction if none of the individuals named in the firm name are actively licensed in Mississippi.
EXAMPLES (Provided as guidelines only. This is not an exhaustive or complete listing of scenarios.):
ALLOWED | NOT ALLOWED |
Smith and Jones Architecture (provided Smith and/or Jones are licensed architects and one or both is licensed as an architect in Mississippi) Williams and James Architecture John Doe, Architect (only if both Williams and James are retired or deceased) Architecture Unlimited John Doe, Architect Doe and Smith, Architects and Engineers John Doe, Architect (when Doe is licensed as an architect in Mississippi and there are multiple architects in the firm) ABC Architects and Engineers John Doe, Architect (when Doe is licensed as an architect in Mississippi and there are multiple architects in the firm) | Smith and Jones Architecture (when Smith and/or Jones are actively licensed in another jurisdiction, but neither is licensed in Mississippi) Williams and James Architecture (where Williams and/or James are actively licensed in another jurisdiction, but neither is licensed in Mississippi) Architecture Unlimited (when the name of the architect licensed in Mississippi is not also provided) Doe and Smith, Architects and Engineers (the Mississippi architect must be identified) ABC Architects and Engineers (when the name of the architect license in Mississippi is not also provided) |
Commentary - An architect must always maintain responsible control over the design of a project to ensure all applicable federal, state and local building laws and codes are incorporated into the design and construction of a project. In order to comply with the responsible control requirements, the architect must be able to act independently and not be subject to the control of others. Where the architect is the employee of a contractor, the potential exists for the contractor to exert financial pressure on the architect to forgo compliance with certain building code requirements in order to provide a financial benefit to the contractor to the exclusion of the health, safety and welfare of the individuals occupying the built environment.
Commentary - It is common practice for architects to provide professional services in the setting of a firm consisting of other architects, other design professionals, and non-registered individuals such as draftspersons, marketers, clerical staff, construction administrators, intern architects, licensure candidates and others. The Board recognizes that many such non-registered individuals perform many acts and services for the firm that constitute or support the practice of architecture, such as marketing, design, detailing, specification writing, client contact, and contract administration. In the interest of protecting the health, safety and welfare of the public, it is incumbent upon the registered professionals to maintain responsible control of the firm and its staff persons regarding their acts, duties and work product relating to the practice of architecture. The Board has long held that "responsible control" (previously "direct supervision") of the preparation of drawings and specifications was required in order for the architect to place the architect's seal thereon. This rule clarifies that "responsible control" of other activities of the practice is required as well, such as firm marketing and representation of qualifications, pre-design activities, etc. The architect is not expected to be responsible for conduct or acts committed by non-registrants under the architect's employ or control when said conduct is related to activities or services performed outside of the firm (e.g. "moonlighting" by a draftsperson).
Commentary - The Board encourages the use of qualifications-based selection for all projects, as the Board believes it is the method of procurement of professional design services that is in the best interest of protection of the public's life, health and property.
EXAMPLES (Provided as guidelines only. This is not an exhaustive or complete listing of scenarios.):
Not Allowed: John Doe Architects This is an improper firm name in a case where John Doe is the only individual in the firm licensed as an architect. | Allowed: Smith, Jones and Doe, Architect and Engineers John Doe, Architect This is a proper name in a case where Doe is the only individual in the firm licensed as an architect. ABC Architects John Doe, Architect This is a proper use of a trade name if there are at least two (2) individuals in the firm who are licensed as architects, and if the name of at least one architect licensed in Mississippi is disclosed in conformance with 3.2.3. |
As planning and design, including aesthetic and structural designs, encompass the entire structure, both interior and exterior, the Board holds that engaging in only partial aspects of the definition of architecture remains the practice of architecture and may be performed only by one who is licensed as an architect in conformance with Miss. Code Ann. §§ 73-1-1 et seq. Thus, the practice of interior architecture in buildings is the practice of architecture. Accordingly, individuals who engage in the practice of planning and designing any life safety elements of the interior of any non-exempt buildings, including any aesthetic element, shall be considered practicing architecture.
Commentary - In order to assure a project that is required by law to be designed by an architect is constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications, the architect of record should provide construction administration services as part of the protection of the life, health and property of the individuals using the built environment. Where the architect of record was not originally contracted or is no longer engaged to perform construction administration as defined above, or is providing only limited construction administration services, the architect is required to give the notice outlined above to assure that all parties to the construction project are aware that construction administration is not being performed by the architect of record or is limited in scope. This specifically provides a building official with notice so that the building official may compel the owner to provide someone to perform those services if the building official so chooses.
Commentary: The Board is of the opinion that such a situation creates a conflict of interest for the architect in that the architect is the designer and the contractor for the project, thus removing the checks and balances which assure that the project is constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications.
30 Miss. Code. R. 201-3.2