The Economic Development program (EDP) provides communities with gap funding to assist identified businesses in the creation/retention of jobs for low-and moderate-income persons.
Activity Group Numbers | Maximum Award |
1)Grants to Municipalities: for acquisition, relocation, demolition, clearance, construction, reconstruction, installation and rehabilitation associated withpublic infrastructure projects such as water and sewer facilities, flood and drainage improvements, publicly- owned commercial and industrial buildings, parking, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc. All public infrastructure must be owned by the municipality or public or private utility and be in support of an identified business. | $300,000 |
2) Grants to Municipalities for Direct Business Support: for non-capital equipment, land and site improvements, rehabilitation or construction of commercial or industrial buildings. | $200,000 |
3) Grants to Municipalities for Direct Business Support: Working Capital and capital equipment. | $100,000 |
4) Development Fund Loan (DF): for acquisition of existing facilities, land and site improvements necessary for the construction of a new facility, rehabilitation or construction of commercial or industrial buildings, structures, non-capital equipment, capital equipment, working capital and real property improvements and the development of affordable LMI housing. | $300,000 |
Economic Development Program funds cannot be used to refinance existing debt.
Phasing of projects to make the total cost appear to be below the maximum project size is expressly forbidden.
Members of the OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the three scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. The following criteria will be used:
Scope of Problem (5 points)
Detail the problems or needs facing the community/business to be assisted. Tell how these problems relate to job creation or job retention activities. Describe how the overall financial viability of the community/business is affected by the problems or needs.Impact on Community and Region (5 points)
Identify how employment opportunities for persons of low/moderate income are negatively affected by the identified problems. Emphasize the importance of the affected business in relation to the stability of the community/region and its current financial well being including property tax analysis before and after the proposed activities.Need for Funds (5 points)
Identify reasons why the community/business is unable to finance the proposed project on its own, or with assistance from other sources. Include a narrative that highlights any recent efforts by the community/business to assist job creation/retention activities.Project Description(10 points)
Detail the activities that the community/business will undertake using EDP funds to resolve the problems/needs presented in the Problem Statement. Identify, in detail, the specific acquisition, equipment, real property improvements and/or fixtures that will be installed, modified, and upgraded, etc., with EDP funds. Explain how the solution directly solves the identified problems/needs. Include a firm figure of the number of jobs to be created or retained as a result of the project, and how these jobs relate to persons of low/moderate income. Clearly state the amount of EDP funds sought and how they will fit into the overall financing for the project. Include a graphic description (aerial photo, map, and sketch) of the sites involved. Provide a generalized location of the site relative to the community and a copy of a floodplain map showing the project location. Include existing and proposed site and/or building improvements.Effect on Assisted Business (5 points)
Describe the effect the EDP award and completion of the project, as a whole, will have on the ability of the community/business to remain competitive, and create/retain quality jobs. Describe the market including identification of competitors, price structure, resource availability, operating/manufacturing costs, transportation costs, demand, and other factors influencing the marketability of the product or service proposed. Also identify all project risks and the extent of the risks.Project Timeline and Feasibility (5 points)
Describe how the project is assured of successful completion within 12 months. Identify what work, such as pre-engineering, construction and improvements, or fixture purchases that have been completed, or are in process, and exactly how these relate to the proposed ED project. Provide background information (including resumes) for the owners and/or managers of the business and specific information about the skills and experiences of the owners and/or managers as related to the successful management of the business and proposed project. Include a concise timetable for project implementation.Public Hearing Process (5 points)
Describe how citizen participation contributed to the actual development of this application, including how the required public hearing contributed to the process. (Submit a public hearing record consisting of the published public hearing notice, hearing minutes, and attendance list with the original and all three copies of the application.)Business/Local Involvement(5 points)
Outline other input from businesses, chambers of commerce, development organizations, local groups and individuals have had in increasing the citizen participation process for the proposed project. Highlight how the use of any media (TV, radio, newspapers, etc.) increased public awareness and participation in the EDP project.Strategy Priority (5 points) How the proposed EDP activity is aligned with the State's economic development strategy and supports at least one of the State's targeted technology sectors, specifically one of the following: Precision Manufacturing Technology, Biotechnology, Aquaculture and Marine Technology, Composite Materials Technology, Environmental Technology, Advanced Technologies for Forestry and Agriculture or Information Technology.
Natural Resource Based (5 points) Will be based on information received in the EDP Application.
Project Significance (45 points) Each application will be evaluated in relation to all others. Scores will be based on a maximum of 5 points in each of the following nine areas:
Number of jobs to be created/retained Number of jobs created/retained as % of municipal unemployment Number of jobs created/retained as % of LMA unemployment % community unemployment is above state average % of LMA unemployment is above state average EDP dollars per job created/retained Hourly salary of jobs created/retained exceeds County Per Capita Income Quality of jobs created/retained based on wages and fringe benefits % non EDP funding in projectCompleted applications will be reviewed by the OCD Review Team who will make a recommendation to the Commissioner of Economic and Community Development. The following criteria will be considered during the application phase:
The Community Enterprise Grant (CE) Program provides grant funds to assist in innovative solutions to problems faced by micro-businesses, promote business façade programs and make streetscape improvements in downtown and village areas. Assistance to businesses may be in the form of grants or loans at the discretion of the community.
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the three scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 100 points is obtainable.
*State the problems then present the scope and magnitude of the identified problems. - 6 points
*Explain how the problems negatively impact the local economy and the viability of existing downtown or village area. - 8 points
*Clearly define how the problems negatively affect LMI persons and/or contribute to slum/blight conditions. - 10 points
*Describe the obstacles to overcoming the identified problems. - 6 points
*Explain why CE funds are necessary for the project; describe efforts to secure other grant or loan funds, and tell why they are not are available locally to assist businesses or local government with their development and site improvement needs. - 10 points
*List the specific activities to be undertaken in the project. For streetscapes include location, size and design features. - 5 points
*Identify the specific use of CE funds and the specific tasks or activities to be funded with each other source of funds. - 5 points
*Provide Identification and description of potential business grant/loan applicants and their needs; or provide details of how areas in need of streetscape improvements were identified and prioritized. - 5 points
*Explain how the CE project will stimulate business in the downtown or village area and assist in improving the area's long-term viability. - 6 points
*Describe how the CE funded activities will have a positive impact on LMI persons and/or on alleviation of the slum/blight conditions. - 6 points
*Provide a project timeline; list activities or actions completed to date. - 4 points
*Describe the capacity and experience of the administrator to market and conduct a grant/loan program or streetscape improvement effort; and describe how CE funds will be expended in a timely manner. - 5 points
*Budget Summary Review - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation. - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing activities/comments (not counting required public hearing) and the overall citizen participation process in application and project development. - 4 points
*Involvement of downtown and local businesses, Chambers of Commerce, development groups or other business related organizations in identification of problems and development of the application and project. - 4 points
*Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process. - 4 points
*How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments. - 4 points
Stage 2: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development Phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final Application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Non-Profit Development Grant Program (NPDG) provides funding for communities forming partnerships with local non-profit development organizations to carry out activities in blighted areas located in designated downtown areas which will foster community economic development initiatives leading to the elimination of slum and blight and increased job opportunities for LMI persons.
The Interim Finance Program (IFP) utilizes funds not disbursed in the State's Letter of Credit for grants to communities to assist businesses or developers in creating housing and job opportunities for low and moderate-income people through short-term loans. The duration of loans will be dependant on availability of CDBG funds.
either a gap in available funding for the project or on a determination that the costs of financing so adversely affect the project's rate of return that the project would not be undertaken without additional assistance. IFP grantees must demonstrate the proposed rate and term have been set to ensure that assistance provided is the minimum needed and the proposed assistance is necessary and appropriate to carry out the economic development project.
19- 498 C.M.R. ch. 38, § 3