The Housing Assistance Grant (HA) Program provides funding to address housing problems of low-and moderate-income persons.
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the three scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 80 points is obtainable.
*A description of the specific housing problems to be addressed with HA funds - 10 points
*How the problems were identified - 10 points
*How these issues affect LMI persons in the community or region - 10 points
*A description of the plan proposed to implement the housing project - 10 points
*How emphasis will be placed on a community based approach using collaborative efforts 10 points
*Summary of the activities and use of HA funds -10 points
*How overall citizen participation process directly relates to identification of solution strategies and application development - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing activities/comments (not counting required public hearing) on application and project development - 4 points
*Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process - 4 points
How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments - 4 points
Stage 2: Community Evaluation Factor- A Community Evaluation Factor with a maximum point total of 20 has been pre-determined by an independent authority for each community in Maine and published in the 2009 Program Statement.
Stage 3: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team added to the pre-determined Community Evaluation Factor. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development Phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final Application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Home Repair Network Program (HRN) provides funding to address housing problems of low- and moderate-income persons by combining CDBG funding with the Maine State Housing Authority and the United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development Program funding. This program will provide housing rehabilitation services administered on a regional basis throughout Maine, except as stated in 1 (b) below.
The Critical Access Ramp Program (CARP) provides funding to address accessibility problems of low- and moderate-income disabled persons through a partnership with Alpha One. This program will provide moveable, reusable ramps administered on a regional basis throughout Maine, except as stated in 1 (b) below.
The Public Facilities Grant (PF) Program provides gap funding for local public facility activities, which are part of a community development strategy leading to future public and private investments.
Activity Breakdown: Applicants may apply for one or more activities within a specific activity group. Applicants cannot mix activities from different activity groups in an application.
Activity Group Numbers | Maximum Amount |
1)Fire Stations | $350,000 |
2) Community, child, senior, and health centers, libraries sheltered workshops, homeless shelters, pier/wharf | $350,000 |
3) Removal of architectural barriers (as a distinct, stand-alone project) | $150,000 |
4) Historic preservation (as a distinct, stand-alone project) | $150,000 |
5) Fire fighting equipment, salt/sand storage shed transfer station, parks and recreation facilities public works garage, dams | $ 50,000 |
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the three scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 80 points is obtainable.
*A description of the why the project is necessary - 6 points
*Conditions warranting new construction or renovations, including health and safety concerns- 8 points
*How these conditions affect LMI persons in the community or region - 8 points
*Size and make up of user base of facility - 4 points
*Why PF funds are necessary for project - 4 points
*A description of the new or renovated facility, including size, design factors, alleviation of health and safety factors, utilities and location - 6 points
*Specific use of PF funds - 6 points
*Positive effect on LMI persons - 6 points
*Project timeline, details of engineering or architectural work completed to date, proposed date for start of construction, tasks remaining prior to project implementation, final commitment of other funds and how PF funds will be expended within a 12 month period - 12 points
*How overall citizen participation process directly relates to identification of solution strategies and application development - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing activities/comments (not counting required public hearing) on application and project development - 4 points
Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process - 4 points
How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments - 4 points
Stage 2: Community Evaluation Factor- A Community Evaluation Factor with a maximum point total of 20 has been pre-determined by an independent authority for each community in Maine and will be published in the 2009 program Statement.
Stage 3: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team added to the pre-determined Community Evaluation Factor. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final Application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Public Infrastructure Grant (PI) Program provides gap funding for local infrastructure activities, which are part of a community development strategy leading to future public and private investments.
Activity Breakdown: Applicants may apply for one or more activities within a specific activity group. Applicants cannot mix activities from different activity groups in an application.
Activity Group Numbers | Maximum Amount |
1) Water system installation/improvements, sewer system installation/improvements, water/sewer system hookups, storm drainage, utility infrastructure (Road or street reconstruction is not eligible) | $500,000 |
2) Infrastructure in support of new LMI affordable fully financed multifamily housing | $500,000 |
3) Streets and roads, parking, curbs, gutters | $100,000 |
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the three scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 80 points is obtainable.
*A description of the why the project is necessary, previous efforts to address needs, and how the project was prioritized locally - 5 points
*How the infrastructure problems were verified, including studies, testing and record keeping - 6 points
*How the verified health, safety and welfare conditions affect users and others in the community and region - 6 points
*Size and demographic make up of user base and target area of projected infrastructure project - 5 points
*Why PI funds are necessary to fill a funding gap and how other funding sources will work with PI funds to implement the project - 8 points
*A description of the proposed infrastructure improvements, including size, capacity, design, utilities and fit with existing systems - 6 points
*Positive impacts on health, safety and welfare of users directly attributable to proposed PI expenditures - 6 points
*Extent of financial benefits to users from reduced rates, rents and other costs. If financial benefits cannot be quantified, identify other short and long term benefits that will be experienced - 6 points
* Project timeline: list tasks necessary to begin implementation. Identify work already completed, such as engineering, design and final commitment of other funds. Identify when remaining tasks will be completed. Estimate a project completion date and describe why project timeline is feasible - 12 points
*How overall citizen participation process directly relates to identification of solution strategies and application development - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing activities/comments (not counting required public hearing) on application and project development - 4 points
Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process - 4 points
How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments - 4 points
Stage 2: Community Evaluation Factor- A Community Evaluation Factor with a maximum point total of 20 has been pre-determined by an independent authority for each community in Maine and published in the 2009 Program Statement.
Stage 3: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team added to the pre-determined Community Evaluation Factor. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development Phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final Application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Public Service Grant (PSG) Program addresses community resource needs by providing funding for operating expenses, equipment, and program materials for public service programs which will benefit low/moderate income (LMI) persons.
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the four scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 100 points is obtainable.
*A description of the scope, magnitude and severity of the identified problems - 8 points
*Past efforts to deal with the identified problems - 4 points
*Conditions requiring a new or expanded service - 5 points
*Issues faced by service providers including capacity, finances and staffing - 6 points
*Why PSG funds are critical for the project - 7 points
*A description of the new or expanded service, specific use of PSG funds, including how this service will resolve identified problems, and why this service will be more effective than existing services for the targeted beneficiaries - 8 points
*How PS funds will be utilized solely to assist LMI persons or a HUD approved Limited Clientele group - 8 points
*Project timeline, including a start date, tasks completed to date and how PSG funds will be expended in a timely manner - 10 points
*Capacity and qualifications of the service provider implementing the project, including familiarity with the needs of project beneficiaries, and the experience of the overall PSG grant administrator - 7 points
*How the public service established or expanded with PSG funding will continue after the PSG funding ends, or there will no longer be a need for these services after the PSG program ends - 7 points
*Budget Page review - 3 points
*Matching Funds Table review - 3 points
*% which all firm commitments exceed minimum 20%
0% - 15% - 0 points
16% - 30% - 2 points
31% - 50% - 3 points
More than 50% - 4 points
*How overall citizen participation process directly relates to identification of solution strategies and application development - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing activities/comments (not counting required public hearing) on application and project development - 4 points
*Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process - 4 points
*How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments - 4 points
Stage 2: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development Phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final Application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Downtown Revitalization Grant (DR) Program provides funds to communities to implement comprehensive, integrated, and innovative solutions to the problems facing their downtown districts. These community revitalization projects must be part of a strategy that targets downtown service and business districts and will lead to future public and private investment. Qualified applicant communities must have a downtown district meeting the definition of PL 776 enacted by the 119th legislature.
Stage 1: Review Team Analysis- Members of the four-person OCD Review Team will assign a Review Point Total for each application reviewed. Review Point Totals will consist of the sum of the four scoring areas below and be determined by the total of each sub-scoring area. A maximum of 100 points is obtainable.
Describe the scope and magnitude of the problems, and how they are obstacles for revitalizing the downtown. - 8 points
*Explain how the problems negatively impact the viability of existing downtown businesses, or new development and expansion. - 8 points
*Demonstrate how the problems affect LMI persons, or how they contribute to slum/blight conditions. - 7 points
*Explain why DR funds are necessary for the project, and describe efforts to secure other grant or loan funds. - 7 points
*Clearly link the proposed DR activities to action steps outlined in your community's Downtown Action Plan, and
explain how the project will stimulate economic activity in the downtown. - 10 points
*List the specific activities to be addressed in this downtown revitalization effort, and identify the tasks to be undertaken with DR funds and the activities to be undertaken with each other source of funds. - 10 points
*Define how the proposed DR activities provide a solution to the problems and assist in improving the area's viability, and how the activities will have a positive impact on LMI persons, or on alleviation of the slum/blight conditions. - 10 points
*Describe the capacity and experience of the administrator who will be implementing the project, describe the engineering and design work completed to date, provide a project timeline, and explain how DR funds will be expended in a timely manner. - 10 points
*Budget Page review - 3 points
*Matching Funds Table review - 3 points
*% which firm cash commitments exceed minimum 25%
0% - 15% - 0 points
16% - 30% - 2 points
31% - 50% - 3 points
More than 50% - 4 points
*Effective use of any media (newspapers, radio, TV, etc) to further public awareness and participation. - 4 points
*Relevance of listed meeting/hearing comments (not counting required public hearing) and the overall citizen participation process in application and project development. - 4 points
*Involvement of downtown and local businesses, Chambers of Commerce, development groups or other business related organizations in identification of problems and development of the application and project. - 4 points
*Involvement of potential LMI project beneficiaries in development of the application and project, and how the required public hearing relates to the application development and citizen participation process. - 4 points
*How other local resources (cash and in-kind) are directly related to the project, and the establishment of a cash value equivalent for all in-kind commitments. - 4 points
Stage 2: : Maine Downtown Center Designation Bonus 3 bonus points will be assigned to each applicant community designated as a Main Street Maine Community by the Maine Downtown Center.
Stage 3: Final Application Score- Each application will receive a Final Application Score consisting of the average of the scores assigned by members of the 4-person OCD Review Team added to any applicable Maine Downtown Center Bonus. Starting at the top of the scoring list, applicants will be invited to proceed to the Project Development Phase as funds allow. There is no minimum Final application Score required for an application to be considered for funding.
The Maine Downtown Center Assistance (MDCA) provides funding to support activities undertaken by the Maine Downtown Center on behalf of communities addressing critical needs in established downtown areas.
The Urgent need Grant (UN) Program provides funding to communities to address serious and immediate threats to health and welfare which are declared state or federal disasters.
Application: An UN application must include the following:
19-498 C.M.R. ch. 37, § 2