19- 498 C.M.R. ch. 17, § 2

Current through 2024-50, December 11, 2024
Section 498-17-2 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A. HOUSING ASSISTANCE GRANTS

The Housing Assistance Grant (HA) Program provides funding to address housing problems of low and moderate income persons.

1. Special Threshold Criteria and Certifications : The State will distribute Housing Assistance Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible Activities: Eligible activities include Acquisition, Code Enforcement, Conversion of Non-Residential structures, Demolition, Historic Preservation, Housing Rehabilitation, New Housing Construction, Relocation Assistance, and Removal of Architectural Barriers, directly related to assisting or creating residential housing units.
(b) All communities applying for Housing Assistance funds must certify that they will:
(i) adhere to MRSA Title 10, Chapter 214, Energy Efficiency Building Performance Standards Act, Section 1415- c (1), (1A) and Section 1415-G in the construction of any new residential housing units;
(ii) provide a local match equivalent to 10 percent of the total grant award.
2. Program Requirements:
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Housing Assistance program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances: l) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or 2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.

(b) Maximum Housing Assistance Grant Amount: $300,000
(c) Maximum Housing Rehabilitation Costs: The amount of grants or loans available to participants will be no more than $15,000 per unit rehabilitated. Additional funds up to a maximum of $7,000 may be available in the following cases: replacement housing, foundation work, inadequate sewage disposal, lack of potable water, presence of asbestos, lead-based paint, radon, or other hazardous material, or accessibility modifications. In extreme circumstances, the maximum housing rehabilitation cost may be waived by the OCD.
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I), and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of an application is ten pages. The application deadline is December 19, 1997.

Each application will be rated in relation to all other HA applications. A minimum of 70 points from the Problem Statement, Proposed Solution, Citizen Participation and Commitment sections will be required for an application to be considered for funding. A Distress score will be added to this result to determine the application score.

(a) Problem Statement (30 points): .
(i) Scope of Problem: (10 points) - Identification and description of the magnitude and nature of the housing conditions to be addressed (i.e., substandard housing, lack of affordable housing, etc.).
(ii) LMI and Community Impact: (10 points) - Identification and description of the impact of the problem on low-to-moderate income residents and the larger community or neighborhood. Include a description of the health, safety and welfare issues of the residents.
(iii) Energy Efficiency Considerations: (10 points) - Identification and description of the conditions that prevent LMI persons from maintaining affordable, comfortable and efficient energy standards.
(b) Proposed Solution (30 points):
(i) Effectiveness: (20 points) - Description of how funds will be used to solve the identified problems.
(ii) Project Feasibility: (10 points) - Identification of tasks, timetables and the responsible parties to implement the proposed solution.
(c) Citizen Participation (20 points) - Identification and description of the process, including public meetings, hearings and other methods to solicit the involvement of residents, local organizations and public officials, and how the involvement contributed to this application.
(d) Commitment (10 points) - Identification and description of how the applicants, groups, and private citizens will contribute a financial and/or technical resource to the project, the status of those commitments, and a timeframe for the commitments, with a basis for determining value.
(e) Distress (10 points) - OCD will derive a community's distress score from the following four areas:
(i) Housing: (1.5 points) - A score based on the percent of substandard housing (.75) and a score based on the percent of households with income less than 50% of the county median per year and spending greater than 25% of their income on housing costs (.75). The percentages will be derived from the most recent data available.
(ii) Economic Conditions: (3.5 points total) - Percentage Factor ; a composite score derived from two factors - a ranking based on the unemployment rates of the applicant communities (1.5 points), plus .15 points for each percentage point the community's municipal unemployment rate is above the State's average unemployment rate. Absolute Factor (1.0 point); a score derived from ranking absolute numbers of unemployed persons in each community from highest to lowest. The ranking will be divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 1; middle .66; low 0.33). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iii) Local Fiscal Capacity: (3.5 points) - A score determined by ranking the effective (State equalized) tax rates divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 3.5, middle 2.0 and low .5) for each applicant within population categories (999 and less; 1,000 to 2499; 2,500 to 4,999; 5,000 and above). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iv) Poverty Level: (1.5 points) - A score derived by using the % of persons in a community below 150% of the poverty level as defined by the most recent data available for each applicant within population categories (999 and less; 1,000 to 2499; 2,500 to 4,999; 5,000 and above). The ranking will be divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 1.5, middle 1.0, low .5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
B. PUBLIC FACILITIES/INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS

The Public Facilities/Infrastructure Grant (PFIG)Program provides funding for local infrastructure and public facility activities which are part of a community development strategy leading to future public and private investments.

1. Special Threshold Criteria and Certifications: The State will distribute Public Facilities/Infrastructure Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible Activities: Eligible activities include infrastructure for new housing construction and construction, acquisition, reconstruction, installation, rehabilitation, site clearance, historic preservation, and relocation assistance associated with such projects as listed below under 2. (a), (b) and (c). An application may include more than one eligible PFIG activity.
(b) Local Match: All communities applying for PFIG funds must certify that they will provide a local match equivalent to 20 percent of the total grant award. Fire Stations will require a 30% cash match.
2. Program Activities:

Activity Breakdown: Applicants may apply for one or more activities from a single category but cannot apply for activities from more than one category.

Each applicant must identify the category it is applying for on the form provided in the application package.

(a) Category 1: Water, sewer, sewer hook-ups, storm drainage, and infrastructure for new housing construction.
(b) Category 2: Streets/roads, sidewalks, public wharfs/piers, fire stations, community centers, child care/senior citizen centers, health care centers, sheltered workshops, homeless shelters, libraries, neighborhood revitalization, and removal of architectural barriers.
(c) Category 3: Parking, curbs, gutters, public parks, recreation facilities, public works garages, salt/sand storage facilities, fire fighting and rescue equipment, and transfer stations.
3. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Public Facilities Infrastructure program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances:

1) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or
2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.
(b) Maximum Public Facilities/Infrastructure Grant Amounts:
(i) Category 1: $400,000
(ii) Category 2: $250,000
(iii) Category 3: $ 50,000
(c) Funding Restrictions. PFIG funds may not be used to assist infrastructure for the purpose of job creation. Job creation infrastructure activities are eligible in the Economic Development Infrastructure Grant program. With the exception of proposals for infrastructure in support of new housing construction, no housing activities may be assisted with PFIG funds. All other eligible housing activities are listed in the Housing Assistance Grant program.

A maximum of two fire station projects will be funded. Sand/salt shed projects will only be funded after all other eligible category #3 projects.

(d) Demonstration of National Objective. Applicants must demonstrate that their project meets a threshold of benefiting 51% or more low-to-moderate income persons or preventing or eliminating slum and blighting conditions. Income surveys must use HUD-approved methodology and be accepted by OCD.
(e) Bonus Points for Service Center Communities. PFIG Category #1 applicants will receive two bonus points if they have been identified by the State Planning Office as a service center community. A list of service center communities is included with this statement.
4. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I) and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of a Phase I application is ten pages. The application deadline is January 16, 1998.

Each application will be rated in relation to all others in its respective category. A minimum of 70 points from the Problem Statement, Proposed Solution, Commitment and Citizen Participation sections will be required for an application to be considered for funding. A distress score and bonus points will be added to this result.

(a) Problem Statement (25 points):
(i) Scope of Problem: (10 points) - Identification and description of the nature and magnitude of the problems to be addressed with PFIG funds.
(ii) Health, Safety, Welfare: (10 points) - Impact of the stated problem on public health, safety, and welfare.
(iii) Priority: (5 points) - Significance of the problems to be addressed with PFIG funds in relation to other public facility problems within the community.
(b) Proposed Solution (25 points):
(i) Project Description: (10 points) - Identification and description of the activities proposed to resolve the problems presented in the Problem Statement.
(ii) Project Feasibility: (15 points) - Identification of tasks, timetables, and the responsible parties to implement the proposed solution.
(c) Citizen Participation (20 points): Identification and description of the process, including public meetings, hearings and other methods to solicit involvement of residents, local organizations and public officials; and how the involvement contributed to this application.
(d) Commitment (20 points): Identification and description of how community, organizations and citizens will contribute financial and/or technical resources to the project, the status of those commitments, and a timeframe for the commitments, with a basis for determining value.
(e) Bonus Points (2 points): For category #1 projects, "service center communities" identified by the State Planning Office will receive two bonus points.
(f) Distress (10 points): OCD will derive a community's distress score from the following four areas:
(i) Housing: (1.5 points) - A score based on the percent of substandard housing (.75) and a score based on the percent of households with income less than 50% of the county median per year and spending greater than 25% of their income on housing costs (.75). The percentages will be derived from the most recent data available.
(ii) Economic Conditions: (3.5 points total) - Percentage Factor ; a composite score derived from two factors - a ranking based on the unemployment rates of the applicant communities (1.5 points), plus .15 points for each percentage point the community's municipal unemployment rate is above the State's average unemployment rate. Absolute Factor (1.0 point); a score derived from ranking absolute numbers of unemployed persons in each community from highest to lowest. The ranking will be divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 1; middle .66; low 0.33). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iii) Local Fiscal Capacity: (3.5 points) - A score determined by ranking the effective (State equalized) tax rates divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 3.5, middle 2.0 and low .5) for each applicant within population categories (999 and less; 1,000 to 2499; 2,500 to 4,999; 5,000 and above). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iv) Poverty Level: (1.5 points) - A score derived by using the % of persons in a community below 150% of the poverty level as defined by the most recent data available for each applicant within population categories (999 and less; 1,000 to 2499; 2,500 to 4,999; 5,000 and above). The ranking will be divided into three segments and assigned points accordingly (high 1.5, middle 1.0, low .5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
C. PUBLIC SERVICE GRANTS

The Public Service Grant (PSG) Program addresses community resource needs by providing funding for operating expenses, equipment and program materials for public service programs.

1. Special Threshold Criteria and Certifications: The State will distribute Public Service Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible Activities: Eligible activities include operating and program material expenses for child care, health care, job training, recreation programs, education programs, public safety services, fair housing activities, senior citizen services, homeless services, drug abuse counseling and treatment, and energy conservation counseling and testing provided to:
(i) persons who are members of the following groups that are currently presumed by HUD to meet the LMI criteria,

Abused Children Battered Spouses Elderly Persons

Persons with Disabilities Homeless Persons Illiterate Persons

Migrant Farm Workers

(ii) participants in a program designed to limit the PSG funded benefit exclusively to eligible Low and Moderate Income persons.
(b) All communities applying for PSG funds must certify that:
(i) the public service represents:
a) a new service to the community; or
b) a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service;
(ii) a local match equivalent to 20 percent of the total grant award will be provided; and,
(iii) the activity will meet the need or will continue after PSG funding is expended.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Public Service program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances:

1) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or
2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.

(b) Maximum Public Service Grant Amount: $50,000
(c) Funding Restrictions: PSG funding is restricted to non-construction activities as listed in the Eligible Activities Section. Funding for construction or rehabilitation of public service facilities must be in place before a PSG award will be made.
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I), and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of an application is eight pages. The application deadline is April 24, 1998.

Each application will be rated in relation to all others. A minimum of 70 points from the Problem Statement, Proposed Solution, Citizen Participation and Commitment sections will be required for an application to be considered for funding. A distress score will be added to this result.

(a) Problem Statement (20 points):

Scope of Problem: (20 points) - Identification and description of the nature and magnitude of the problems to be addressed with PSG funds.

(b) Proposed Solution (30 points):
(i) Project Description: (10 points) - Description of how PSG funds will be used to solve the problems.
(ii) Project Feasibility: (10 points) - Identification of tasks, timetables and the parties responsible to implement the proposed solution.
(iii) Capacity: (10 points) - Identification and description of the qualifications and abilities of those who will implement the project.
(c) Citizen Participation (20 points): Identification and description of the process, including public meetings, hearings and other methods to solicit involvement of residents, local organizations and public officials, and how this involvement contributed to this application.
(d) Commitment (20 points): Identification and description of how the community, organizations, and citizens will contribute financial and/or technical resources to the project, the status of those commitments, and a timeframe for the commitments, with the basis for determining value.
(e) Distress (10 points): OCD will derive a community's distress score from the following two areas:
(i) Unemployment Rate: (3.5 points) - A score determined by taking the community's yearly average unemployment rate and dividing it by the standard of 10% (this figure represents 10% unemployment). This figure will be multiplied by the 3.5 points assigned to this category. Communities with a yearly average unemployment rate greater than 10% will automatically receive the total points allowed.
(ii) Unemployment Absolute Numbers: (3.5 points) - Communities will be ranked from highest to lowest based upon the numbers of unemployed persons. The ranking will be divided into three equal segments and assigned points accordingly (high, 3.5; middle 2.0; and low 0.5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iii) LMI Percentage: (1.5 points) - A score derived by dividing the community's most recent low and moderate income (LMI) percentage by 51 percent. This figure will be multiplied by 1.5 to determine the score for LMI percentage. Communities with an LMI of 51 percent or more will receive the total points allowed.
(iv) LMI Absolute Numbers: (1.5 points) - Communities will be ranked from highest to lowest based upon the numbers of low and moderate income households. This ranking will be divided into three equal segments and assigned points accordingly (high 1.5; middle 1.0; low 0.5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
D. DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PROGRAM

The Downtown Revitalization Program (DR) will provide funds to enable communities to implement comprehensive, integrated and innovative solutions to the problems facing their downtown districts. These community revitalization projects must be part of a strategy that targets downtown service and business districts and will lead to future public and private investment.

1. Special Threshold Criteria and Certifications: The State will distribute Downtown Revitalization Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible activities include all those eligible under the Public Facilities/Infrastructure, Public Service, Housing Assistance, or Business Assistance programs as relevant to the revitalization of a downtown district. Some housing activities including the development of new rental housing may be funded with HOME program funds from the Maine State Housing Authority.
(b) Local Match - All communities applying for Downtown Revitalization funds must certify that they will provide a local match equivalent to 20% of the total grant award.
2. Special Program Requirements
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Downtown Revitalization program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances:

1) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or
2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.
(b) Planning Requirements: All applicants must have completed either a CDBG funded Quality Main Street Planning process or an equivalent downtown revitalization planning process within the past four years. The proposed DR activities must be cited in the plan as a recommended action to enhance the downtown.
(c) Maximum Award: $400,000
(d) Bonus Points for Service Center Communities Applicants will receive two bonus points if they have been identified by the State Planning Office as a service center community.
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I) and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of the Phase I application is ten pages. The application deadline is January 30, 1998.

Each application will be rated in relation to all others. A minimum of 70 points from the Problem, Solution, Commitment and Citizen Participation sections will be required for an application to be considered for funding.

(a) Problem Statement (30 points)
(i) Scope of Problems (20 points) - Identification and description of the nature and magnitude of the identified problems to be addressed with DR funds.
(ii) Impact on Economic Vitality (10 points) - Describe how the problems negatively impact the economy of the community and persons of low-to-moderate income.
(b) Solution (40 points)
(i) Project Description (15 points) - Description of how funds will be used to solve the identified problems.
(ii) Comprehensive Nature of Solution (10 points) - Description of how the activities relate to the community's total downtown revitalization effort.
(iii) Feasibility (15 points) - Identification of tasks, timetables and the responsible parties to implement the proposed solution.
(c) Citizen Participation (10 points) - Identification and description of the process, descriptions of public meetings, hearings and other methods to solicit the involvement of residents, local organizations and public officials, and how the involvement contributed to this application.
(d) Commitment (20 points) - Identification and description of how the community, organizations, and citizens will contribute financial and/or technical resources to the project, the status of those commitments, and a timeframe for the commitments, with a basis for determining value.

National Objective

State how the project, if funded and implemented, will meet the CDBG national objectives of benefiting low and moderate income persons or eliminating slum and blighting conditions.

Downtown Revitalization Implementation Plan

Each application must include a copy of the implementation or action plan from the community's Downtown Revitalization Plan.

E. URGENT NEED GRANTS

The Urgent Need Grant (UNG) Program provides funding to enable a community to address serious and immediate threats to health and welfare.

1. Special Threshold Criteria and Certifications:
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, including plantations, are eligible to apply for and receive Urgent Need funds. County governments may apply on behalf of unorganized territories. Counties may make more than one application on behalf of distinct unorganized territories. Groups of local governments may apply for multi-jurisdictional or joint emergency situations. Multi-jurisdictional applications require designation of one local government as the lead applicant and consent for the designation by each participating local government.
(b) Project Eligibility: Pursuant to Section 104(b) 3 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, the applicant must address a community development need which:
(i) poses a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community;
(ii) originated or became a direct threat to public health and safety no more than 18 months prior to the submission of the application;
(iii) is a project the applicant cannot finance on its own; and
(iv) cannot be addressed with other sources of funding.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Necessary Documentation: The emergency situation must require immediate action to alleviate the imminent threat of injury or loss of life resulting from a natural or man-made cause.
(b) Application Submittal: Applicants must submit a complete UNG application that includes all required information and documentation.
(c) Maximum UNG Amount: $100,000
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I), and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: An UNG application must include the following:

(a) documentation that the emergency situation was prompted by natural or man-made causes that poses an imminent threat of injury or loss of life;
(b) certification that the proposal is designed to address an urgent need and an immediate response is required to halt the threat of injury or loss of life;
(c) information regarding when the urgent need condition occurred or developed into a threat to health and safety;
(d) evidence confirming the applicant is unable to finance implementation on its own; and,
(e) documentation that other financial resources are not available to implement the proposal.

Phase II Project Development: Urgent Need Grants will be made on a first come basis. Prior to consideration of a grant award, all UNG proposals must meet the four Threshold Criteria and the Special Program requirements. While an invitation into Phase II is not a guarantee of funding, applicants will receive the amount necessary to complete their project, up to the maximum UNG Program award until the funding available is exhausted. Phase II applications must comply with the following:

(aa) Project Planning: Details of the project including engineering, cost analysis, feasibility and structural analysis as necessary.
(bb) Management Plan: Details of the structure and methods established by the community for program management.
(cc) Regulations: Phase II applications will be reviewed for compliance with State and Federal regulations.
4. Approval Process: The UNG funds will be available beginning March 1, 1998. Applications will be accepted on a first come basis. Following receipt of an application, the OCD shall review the application and verify that it contains all the required information. If the application is complete and funds remain available in the program, the Director of OCD will evaluate each proposal and make the decision on whether or not to proceed further. Notification to the applicant of the Director's decision will initiate the Phase II process necessary for contract award.
3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
A. DEVELOPMENT FUND

The Development Fund (DF) Program provides funding to local governments which in turn assist businesses to create jobs for low and moderate income persons.

1. Threshold Criteria:
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, including plantations, are eligible to apply for and receive DF funds. County governments may apply on behalf of unorganized territories.
(b) 51% of the jobs created or retained as a result of DF expenditures proposed by the applicant must be taken by persons of low and moderate income;
(c) the cost per job created or retained with DF funds shall not exceed $35,000.
(d) complete the required DF application materials.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Necessary and Appropriate: A DF loan to a for-profit business must be for projects that are necessary and appropriate. The application must describe the need for DF assistance, reasonableness of the amount requested, the repayment plan, and assurance that the assistance provided is commensurate with the community benefits that will accrue from the project. Documentation must be provided that the project cannot proceed without DF participation.
(b) Financing Plan: The DF application should present a financing plan for a project in which the DF loan comprises the lesser of $100,000 or 40% of total project cost. Project activities and use of funds to calculate the non-DF financing must represent a new investment or a new project. The financing necessary to support at least 60% of the total project cost must be documented by binding commitment letters submitted with the application.
(c) DF Loan: The DF is provided as a grant to a unit of local government. The local government must use designated grant monies as a loan to the business identified in the DF application. The loan must be provided under the terms stated in a DF Letter of Conditions and the contract between DECD and the local government.
(d) Repayment Terms: Justification for the repayment terms relate to filling the financing gap, identifying the rate of return allowed through the repayment terms, or specifying the locational cost differentiations and the benefit derived from the assistance.
3. Selection Process: The DF project will be evaluated as a viable business proposal. The following will be considered:
(a) Strategy Priority: The Development Fund program will give priority to business activities that support the state's economic development strategy. The Development Fund will, whenever possible, be targeted towards economic sectors identified in the strategy.
(b) Chance of Success: The project demonstrates that a market exists for its product or service, the cost of the product or service is competitive in current market conditions, the cash flow projections are adequate to support operating expenses and indebtedness, and management has the capacity to carry out the business or development plan. The project must demonstrate that there are no unidentified costs necessary for implementation.
(c) Financial Plan: The financing for the project is in place and legally binding commitments have been submitted; the proposal has an appropriate leverage ratio of private and public dollars and is structured to meet cash flow projections; and the project pro forma has been reviewed by an independent qualified financial professional. The financing plan must be complete in that there are no unidentified uses of funds necessary to complete the project.
(d) Equity: The proposed loan recipient has made an equity commitment to the project, preferably through a cash injection. Other substantial participation may substitute for a cash equity injection with appropriate explanation regarding equity participation.
(e) DF Loan repayment: Loan repayment terms will allow a project to be implemented while providing the maximum and most expeditious return of CDBG DF monies.
(f) Security: The proposed loan recipient presents collateral appropriate to secure the DF Loan and indicates willingness to enter into security agreements.
(g) Benefit: The DF proposal will be evaluated on the basis of the community and economic benefits that will result from the project.
(h) Cost: The number of permanent jobs created or retained as per DF project dollars will be compared with current and past DF projects. The increase in local tax dollars resulting form the project will be evaluated. Overall project cost effectiveness also will be considered.
(i) Low and Moderate Income Benefit: Benefit to LMI persons will be evaluated. The integration of job training programs, job advancement opportunities, education and training programs, and referral services from Joint Training Partnership Act and Job Service will also be reviewed.
(j) Community and Economic Development: The primary and secondary impacts of the DF project on the community's current and future economic development will be evaluated.
4. Approval Process:
(a) Application: Applications shall be submitted by the first Thursday of each month. DECD staff will review the applications to determine if the threshold criteria have been met. A credit analysis will be conducted by DECD or its designee for each proposal. Following staff analysis, applications will be evaluated by a review committee. As a review body, the DF Committee will make recommendations to the Director of the Office of Business Development . The DF Committee is appointed by the Director and consists of a representative of local government, a certified public accountant, an attorney, a representative of private financing, a business person, and two at-large appointees.
(b) DF Committee Recommendations: The DF Committee will review staff reports and make recommendations to the Director for awards. The Committee will recommend one of four options :
(i) approval of requested amount and terms;
(ii) approval of requested amount but under different terms;
(iii) rejection with staff recommendation for complete/partial resubmission; or,
(iv) rejection.
(c) Quarterly Allocation: The allocation will be limited to $300,000 per quarter, plus any unobligated portion of allocations of previous quarters. This limit can be waived by the Director of OBD. The Director also reserves the right to reject any or all applications in any quarter.
B. REGIONAL ASSISTANCE FUND

The Regional Assistance Fund (RAF) Program provides financial resources to local governments or regional organizations which can use the RAF assistance as leverage to obtain funds under the Economic Development Administration (EDA) Economic Adjustment Assistance Program (Title IX) and the EDA Public Works Program (Title I) or the Rural Development Agency (RDA), Rural Business Enterprise (RBE) Grant and the Intermediary Relending Program (IRP) and/or other Federal, State, and private programs. The purpose of the RAF is to bring additional money into the State and therefore RAF cannot be used as match with the State's Small Cities CDBG program or conventional lending institutions.

1. Threshold Criteria:
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, including plantations and Counties, are eligible to apply for and receive a RAF grant. County governments may also apply on behalf of unorganized territories. Groups of local governments may apply for a multi-jurisdictional or joint RAF project. Multi-jurisdictional applications require designation of one local government as the lead applicant and consent for that designation by each participating local government.
(b) be an eligible planning activity or a project with 51% of the jobs created or retained as a result of RAF expenditures proposed by the applicant are taken by persons of low and moderate income;
(c) be designated by the appropriate organization providing matching funds eligible to receive funds; and
(d) complete the required RAF application materials.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) RAF Funds: Provided an initial RAF application is successful, a grant contract will be executed between DECD and the local government to reserve RAF funds for the applicant, and a RAF Letter of Conditions will be included in the contract to describe the terms that will govern the release of funds from the reserve. The local government must use the designated RAF funds as a match to leverage additional funds.
(b) Limit on Amount of RAF assistance: Each economic development district will be eligible for one RAF grant per year. Additional grants within districts will be made at the discretion of the Director of Office of Business Development (OBD). The RAF application must present a plan in which the RAF funding comprises the lesser of $200,000 or up to 100% of the matching funds required from the local government. The local government must also demonstrate that it is not possible to get funding from any other source for the portion of matching funds sought from the RAF.
(c) Program Income Plan: Thresholds regarding interest rates or repayment terms for RAF assistance to revolving loan funds have not been established. Justification for the repayment terms relate to filling the financing gap, identifying the rate of return allowed through the repayment terms, or specifying the locational cost differentiations and the benefit derived from the assistance. To meet matching requirements, program income generated from RAF funds may be retained by the local grantee or by the local grantee's assignee with the approval of DECD.
(d) Community Financial Commitment: Wherever appropriate the community must demonstrate a vested financial interest in the development project, ranging up to 33% of CDBG funds
3. Selection Process: The RAF project will be evaluated as a viable CDBG proposal. The following considerations will be the focus of the Impact factor.
(a) Financial Plan: The financing need for the project will be based on an assessment of its financial resources. The proposal must have an appropriate leverage ratio of private and public dollars.
(b) Benefit: The RAF proposal will be evaluated on the basis of the community and economic benefits that will result from the project.
(c) Cost: The number of permanent jobs created or retained per RAF project dollars will be reviewed on a case by case basis. The increase in local tax dollars resulting from the project will be evaluated. Overall project cost effectiveness also will be considered.
(d) Low and Moderate Income Benefit: Benefit to low and moderate income persons and families will be evaluated. The integration of job training programs, job advancement opportunities, education and training programs, and referral services from Job Training Partnership Act and Job Service will also be reviewed.
(e) Community and Economic Development: The primary and secondary impacts of the RAF project on the community's current and future economic development will be evaluated.
(f) Local Commitment: The commitment of local funds to the project.

Additional weight will be given to applications showing a local commitment of funds.

4. Approval Process:
(a) Application: Once the applicant has submitted a pre-application to the appropriate agency and is working toward a full application, it may submit a RAF pre-application to DECD. DECD staff will review the RAF pre-applications on a first come basis to determine if the threshold criteria and special program requirements have been met. If and when the application process has been successfully completed, the applicant will be invited to continue to the project development phase. An analysis will be conducted by DECD or its designee for each proposal.
(b) Staff Recommendations: Following the project development analysis, staff will make one of the following three recommendations to the Director of the OBD for awards:
(i) approval of requested amount with requested or different terms:
(ii) approval of lesser amount with requested or different terms; or,
(iii) rejection.
(c) Allocation: The RAF allocation will be $ 800,000. RAF proposals that meet all criteria may be awarded funds until the amount of funds available in the program has been committed.
C. MICRO-LOAN PROGRAM

The Micro-Loan Program (ML) provides communities with funds to assist existing and new businesses to create and/or retain jobs for low and moderate income persons.

Communities are encouraged to enter into partnerships to request Micro-Loan assistance when demand is sufficient on a multi-jurisdictional basis and communities would be better served through a regionally administered loan program.

1. Threshold Criteria and Certifications: The State will distribute Micro Loan Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible Activity: The establishment of a local commercial loan program for the purpose of assisting for-profit businesses.
(b) Project Benefit: As a result of Micro-Loan expenditures, 51% of the jobs created or retained by each business assisted must be taken by persons from households that qualify as low and moderate income (LMI).
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Micro-Loan program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances:

1) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or
2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.

(b) Maximum Micro-Loan Grant Amount: $100,000, part of which may be used to provide technical assistance to loan applicants. Funds not loaned out within 12 months of contract start date will be disencumbered.
(c) Necessary and Appropriate: All loans made from the Micro-Loan Program to for-profit and non-profit businesses must be for projects that are necessary and appropriate as defined by HUD. Documentation must be provided that the project cannot proceed without Micro-Loan assistance.
(d) Financing Plan: Micro-Loans are limited to a maximum of $25,000 per loan. Micro-Loans may provide 100% of the financing for loans up to $15,000. Micro-Loans exceeding $15,000 require a dollar-for-dollar match for the portion of the loan exceeding $15,000.
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I) and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of an application is six pages. The application deadline is March 6, 1998.

Each application will be rated in relation to all other Micro-loan applications. A minimum of 70 points from the Problem Statement, Proposed Solution and Citizen Participation sections will be required for an application to be considered for funding. A distress score will be added to this result.

(a) Problem Statement (35 points):

Scope of Problem: (35 points) - Description of the economic base and business trend problems of the community and the impact on job opportunities. Description of the need for funds.

(b) Proposed Solution (35 points):
(i) Scope of Solution: (17.5 points) - Description of how funds will be used to solve the identified problems.
(ii) Capacity: (17.5 points) - Description of the capacity of the applicant to conduct a Micro-Loan Program and identification of accomplishments in administering loan programs or completing similar responsibilities.
(c) Citizen Participation (20 points):
(i) Business Involvement: (10 points) - Description of how the business community participated in the application process.
(ii) General Citizen Involvement: (10 points) - Description of how the need for, and priority of, a Micro-Loan program was defined by the general citizenry in the application process.
(d) Distress (10 points): OCD will derive a community's distress score from the following two areas:
(i) Unemployment: Rate (3.5 points) - The community's most recent annual unemployment rate will be divided by 10 and the result multiplied by 3.5. Communities with an unemployment rate greater than 10% will receive the total points allowed.
(ii) Unemployment: Absolute Numbers (3.5 points) - Applicant communities will be listed from highest to lowest in terms of numbers of unemployed persons. The list will be divided into three equal segments and assigned points accordingly (high, 3.5; middle 2.0; and low 0.5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(iii) LMI: Percentage (1.5 points) - The community's most recent LMI percentage will be divided by 51 and the result multiplied by 1.5. Communities with an LMI population greater than 51% will receive the total points allowed.
(iv) LMI: Absolute Numbers (1.5 points) - Applicant communities will be listed from highest to lowest in terms of numbers of LMI households. The list will be divided into three equal segments and assigned points accordingly (high, 1.5; middle 1.0; and low 0.5). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM

The Economic Development Infrastructure (EDI) Program provides Maine communities with funds to develop or rehabilitate public infrastructure to support new and existing non-retail businesses that create or retain jobs for low and moderate income individuals.

1. Threshold Criteria and Certifications: The State will distribute Economic Development Infrastructure Program funds through an annual grant application selection process held three times annually.
(a) Eligible Activities: Eligible activities include acquisition, relocation, demolition, clearance, construction, reconstruction, installation, and rehabilitation associated with public infrastructure projects such as water and sewer facilities, flood and drainage improvements, publicly-owned commercial/industrial buildings, parking, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc. which are necessary to create or retain jobs in the non-retail private sector for low and moderate income persons.
(b) Cost per Job: In no case will the cost per job created or retained with EDI funds exceed $35,000.
(c) Project Benefit: 51% of the jobs created or retained as a result of EDI expenditures must be taken by persons of low and moderate income.
(d) Local Match: All communities applying for EDI funds must provide a local match equivalent to 20 percent of the total grant award.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Past Performance: In order to be eligible to apply for the 1998 Economic Development Infrastructure program, communities that received CDBG grants in or prior to 1994 must have closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1995 must have conditionally closed their grants by December 1, 1997. Communities that received CDBG grants in 1996 must have obligated 50% of their benefit activity funds by December 1, 1997.

Exceptions: Applicants may request a waiver of this requirement under the following circumstances:

1) program delays have occurred beyond the control of the grantee due to unforeseen changes in availability of funds or acts of nature or
2) the recipient has received unanticipated program income and expenditure of grant funds has been delayed.

(b) Maximum Economic Development Infrastructure Grant Amount: $400,000.
(c) EDI Projects in Support of Retail Businesses: OCD will accept EDI Program applications in support of retail businesses only under limited conditions;
(i) The retail business represents the provision of new products and services previously unavailable in the community;
(ii) The development or expansion of the retail business represents a net economic gain for the community and the region. EDI applications supporting a retail business or businesses are required to certify that the development represents a net overall gain for the regional economy and not a shift from existing established businesses to a new or expanded one; and
(iii) At least 50% of the jobs created by the retail business must be full time jobs.
(d) Agreement to Participate: The Agreement to Participate form must be submitted with the 1998 EDI Application.
(e) Statement of Job Retention: Each assisted business will certify job retention is the result of EDI assistance, and a completed Statement of Job Retention must accompany the Agreement to Participate.
3. Selection Process: The selection process will consist of two phases: an application phase (Phase I), and a project development phase (Phase II).

Phase I Application: The maximum length of an application is 8 pages. The application deadlines are: February 20, May 8, and July 10, 1998. Each application will be rated in relation to all others. The total points from the Problem Statement, Proposed Solution, Citizen Participation, Numerical Analysis and Commitment sections will be determined for each application. A distress score will be added to this result. A rank order will be established with the highest ranking application receiving first consideration and continuing until the allocation for each EDI funding round is exhausted. The Office of Community Development reserves the right to fund only those applications deemed to be in the best interests of the State of Maine and the Community Development Block Grant Program. Applications will not be funded out of rank order except in instances where a preceding application is deemed ineligible.

(a) Problem Statement (20 points):
(i) Scope of Problem: (10 points) Problems facing a specific business(es) in relation to job creation or retention activities and overall financial viability.
(ii) Impact on Community and Region: (5 points) - Explain how these problems negatively impact local and regional employment and overall economic conditions.
(iii) Need for Funds: (5 points) - Reasons why the community is unable to finance the proposed project on its own, or with assistance from other sources, including the affected business.
(b) Proposed Solution (20 points):
(i) Project Description: (10 points) - Construction activities that the applicant will undertake using EDI funds to resolve the problem presented in the Problem Statement.
(ii) Effect on Assisted Business: (5 points) - Effect EDI assistance and completion of the project as a whole will have on the ability of the business(es) to remain competitive, and create/retain quality jobs for low-to-moderate income persons.
(iii) Project Timeline and Feasibility: (5 points) - Identification of tasks, timetables and responsible parties to implement the project.
(c) Numerical Analysis of Significance of Project to Community and Region (20 points): Numerical tables to demonstrate the significance of the proposed project as it relates to job creation/retention and the effect on the labor market area and local economy. Point values will be determined by comparing the information presented in the application for each below with set scoring criteria established by the OCD.
(i) Number of jobs created/retained: (5 points)
(ii) Percentage of full time jobs: (5 points)
(iii) EDI dollars per job created: (5 points)
(iv) Quality of LMI jobs created: (5 points)
(d) Citizen Participation (10 points):
(i) Public Hearing Process : (5 points) - Documentation of the public hearing held in the applicant's municipality specific to this EDI application.
(ii) Business/Local Involvement: (5 points) - Description of the involvement that the general citizenry, municipal leaders and businesses have had in increasing citizen awareness and developing the EDI application.
(e) Commitment (25 points):
(i) Confirmation of LMI Jobs to be Created/Retained: (10 points) - Firm documentation as to the number and type of jobs to be created or retained as a result of EDI financing.
(ii) Project Funds Table and Source Documentation: (10 points) - A listing of all private and public funds firmly committed to this EDI project and binding documentation that these funds are secured.
(iii) Environmental and Permitting: (5 points) - Accomplished and future actions necessary for successful EDI project implementation.
(f) Unemployment Factor (3 points): OCD will derive a community's unemployment factor score from the following areas:
(i) Unemployment Rate: (2 points) - A score determined by taking the community's most recent annual unemployment rate, dividing it by 10%, and multiplying the result by 2. Communities with a most recent annual unemployment rate greater than 10% will receive the total points allowed.
(ii) Unemployment Numbers: (1 point) - applicants will be ranked from highest to lowest by number of unemployed persons. The rank order will be divided into three segments and assigned points (high 1; middle 0.5; and low 0.25). Unequal divisions will be rounded up.
(g) Priority Points (2 points): EDI projects in support of natural resource based industries and value added products derived from natural resource based industries will receive two additional points.
E. BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

The Business Assistance (BA) program provides funds to assist businesses to create or retain jobs for low and moderate income persons. The Business Assistance program will provide either loans, grants or a combination of each to meet the infrastructure, capital equipment and real property needs of businesses. The program will assist those economic initiatives and development opportunities that are of sufficient magnitude to have a significant impact on a local or regional economy.

1. Threshold Criteria: The state will distribute Business Assistance Program funds through an annual grant application selection process.
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, including plantations, are eligible to apply for and receive BA funds. County governments may only apply on behalf of unorganized territories;
(b) 51% of the jobs created or retained as a result of BA expenditures must be taken by persons of low and moderate income;
(c) The targeted cost per job created or retained with BA funds is $10,000.
2. Special Program Requirements:
(a) Necessary and Appropriate: A BA loan or grant to a business must be for projects that are necessary and appropriate. The application must describe the need for assistance, reasonableness of the amount requested, the repayment plan, and assurance that the assistance provided is commensurate with the community benefits that will accrue from the project. Documentation must be provided that the project cannot proceed without BA assistance.
(b) Financing Plan: The application should present a complete financing plan for a project. The financing necessary to support the total project cost must be documented by binding commitment letters submitted with the application. Project activities or uses of funds used to calculate any non-CDBG financing must represent new investment.
(c) Funds: The Business Assistance funds are provided as a grant to a unit of local government. The local government will loan or grant to the business identified in the BA application. The loan or grant must be provided under the terms stated in a Business Assistance Letter of Conditions and the contract between DECD and the local government.
(d) Repayment Terms: Terms must be based on the business' maximum capacity for principle and interest payments as documented in their pro formas and reviewed by DECD or its designee as appropriate to remain profitable.
(e) Maximum Business Assistance Grant Amount: $300,000
(f) Exclusions: Communities will be eligible to receive either Economic Development Infrastructure (EDI) or Business Assistance funds, but not both for the same project.
3. Eligible Activities: Eligible activities to be carried out with BA funds include: acquisition, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of commercial or industrial buildings, structures, fixtures, capital equipment and real property improvements.
4. Selection Process: The BA Project will be evaluated as a viable business proposal. The following will be considered:
(a) Strategy Priority: The Business Assistance program will give priority to business activities that support the state's economic development strategy. The Business Assistance Program, whenever possible, will be targeted towards economic sectors identified in the strategy.
(b) Chance of Success: The project demonstrates that a market exists for its product or service, the cost of the product or service is competitive in current market conditions, the cash flow projections are adequate to support operating expenses and indebtedness, and management has the capacity to carry out the business or development plan. The project must demonstrate that there are no unidentified costs necessary implementation.
(c) Financial Plan: The financing for the project is in place and legally binding commitments have been submitted; the proposal has an appropriate leverage ratio of private and public dollars and is structured to meet cash flow projections; and the project pro forma has been reviewed by an independent qualified financial professional. The financing plan must be complete.
(d) Equity: The proposed loan/grant recipient has made an equity commitment to the project, preferably through a cash injection. Other substantial participation may substitute for a cash equity as determined by the Director.
(e) BA Loan repayment: Loan repayment terms will allow a project to be implemented while providing the maximum and most expeditious return of CDBG BA monies.
(f) Security: The proposed loan recipient presents collateral appropriate to secure the BA loan and indicates willingness to enter into security agreements.
(g) Public Benefit: The BA proposal will be evaluated on the basis of the community and economic benefits resulting from the project.
(h) Cost: The number of permanent jobs created or retained per BA project dollars and the increase in local tax dollars resulting from the project will be evaluated. Overall project cost effectiveness also will be considered.
(i) Low and Moderate Income Benefit: Benefit to LMI persons will be evaluated. The integration of job training programs, job advancement opportunities, education and training programs, and referral services from Joint Training Partnership Act and Job Service will also be reviewed.
(j) Community and Economic Development: The primary and secondary impacts of the project on the community's current and future economic development will be evaluated.
(k) Community Financial Commitment: The community must demonstrate a vested financial interest in the development project. The program's goal is to obtain community participation ranging up to 33% of CDBG funds.
5. Approval Process:
(a) Application: Applications may be submitted at any time. DECD staff will review the applications to determine if the threshold criteria have been met. A credit analysis will be conducted by DECD or its designee for each proposal. Following staff analysis, applications will be evaluated by a review committee appointed by the Director of the Office of Business Development.
(b) Review Committee Recommendations: The review committee will evaluate staff reports and make recommendations to the Director of OBD for awards.
F. INTERIM FINANCE PROGRAM

The Interim Finance Program (IFP) utilizes funds not disbursed in the State's Letter of Credit for grants to communities to assist businesses or developers in creating housing and job opportunities for low and moderate income people through short-term loans.

1. Threshold Criteria:
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, including plantations, are eligible to apply for and receive IFP funds. County governments may apply on behalf of unorganized territories. Groups of local governments may apply for multi-jurisdictional or joint projects. Multi-jurisdictional applications require designation of one local government as the legal applicant and consent for that designation by each participating local government.
(b) Ineligible Applicants: Entitlement communities of Portland, Bangor, Lewiston and Auburn, are not eligible to receive IFP funds. Except as described in 1(a) above, County governments are not eligible applicants.
(c) The proposed activities must meet the low and moderate income objective as described below:
(i) at least 51% of the jobs created by IFP expenditures must be provided to low and moderate income persons,
(ii) at least 51% of the housing units created by IFP expenditures must be occupied by low and moderate income households, or
(iii) the IFP expenditures reduce the development costs for new multi-family, non-elderly housing construction where not less than 20% of the units will be occupied by low and moderate income households at affordable rents and the proportion of the total cost of developing the project to be borne by the IFP funds is no greater than the proportion of units in the project that will be occupied by low and moderate income households.
(d) Complete the required IFP application materials.
(e) The application amount must be between $500,000 and $5,000,000. The Commissioner of DECD may waive the $500,000 minimum requirement if OCD determines it is in the best interest of the State and if OCD incurs no additional administrative costs as a result of the smaller award.
2. Special Program Requirements: IFP applicants must also comply with the following:
(a) Need for Financing: There must be a demonstrated need for an IFP loan in order for the project to be funded. The need may be based upon either a gap in available funding for the project or on a determination that the costs of financing so adversely affect the project's rate of return that the project would not be undertaken without additional assistance. IFP grantees must demonstrate the proposed rate and term have been set to ensure the assistance provided is the minimum needed and the proposed assistance is necessary and appropriate to carry out an economic development project.
(b) Commitment of Non-CDBG Funds: The business being assisted must demonstrate that all non-CDBG financing, both permanent and interim, necessary for the project's completion has been secured.
(c) Community Benefit: The project must result in a substantial benefit to the community: job creation/retention, tax revenue increases, new housing opportunities, or public facility improvements relative to the public dollar investment.
(d) Irrevocable Letter of Credit: The business being assisted by the IFP grantee must secure an unconditional, irrevocable letter of credit for the full amount of the Interim Financing Loan (principal plus accrued interest to term) from a lending institution acceptable to DECD which will be assigned to the State. The State may accept a FAME guarantee in lieu of an irrevocable letter of credit.
3. Selection Process: IFP grants will be made on a first come basis. Projects that meet requirements may be awarded IFP grants until the amount of funds available in the State's letter of credit has been committed. Following full commitment of the IFP, the State will maintain a waiting list of eligible projects to be funded. If projected funds will not be available for a minimum of six months, the State reserves the right not to accept any additional applications.
4. Approval Process: Through its Technical Assistance Providers, direct mailings, and other marketing methods, the State will advertise the availability of funds within the IFP. Communities interested in applying will: notify the State of their intent to apply, identify the proposed loan recipient and provide an application describing the project. Following the acceptance of a complete application by the State, the DECD or its designee will conduct a financial analysis of the project. DECD will determine if the IFP grant/loan is needed, if all non-CDBG permanent and interim funds are committed, and if an irrevocable letter of credit is in place. The DECD staff will recommend the loan terms and interest rates to the Director of the OCD. The State will review all other program requirements. If these requirements are met, the Commissioner of the DECD will make a grant award based on the project meeting all program requirements.
G. REGIONAL SUPER PARK PROGRAM

The Regional Super Park program provides Maine communities with funds to assist in the provision of necessary infrastructure to develop one regional business park (Super Park) within the State. Recognizing the need to have an inventory of "Super Parks" in Maine, the State is challenging Maine communities to develop the next generation of business industrial parks. These parks to should be developed through a creative regional process involving tax-sharing and other cooperative agreements.

1. Threshold Criteria: The State may distribute Regional Super Park funds through an application selection process and award one grant to the group of communities that develops the proposal with the best chance of success.
(a) Eligible Applicants: All units of general local government in Maine, except entitlement communities, are eligible to apply for the Super Park program. Entitlement communities may participate in a regional super park development in a non-entitlement community.
(b) Eligible Activities: Eligible activities include acquisition, relocation, demolition, clearance, construction, reconstruction, installation, and rehabilitation associated with public improvements such as water and sewer facilities, utility infrastructure, flood and drainage improvements, parking, streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, etc. which are necessary to create or retain jobs in the non-retail private sector for low and moderate income persons.
(c) Cost per Job: The targeted cost per job created ratio is $10,000.
(d) Project Benefit: 51% of the jobs created or retained as a result of Super Park project expenditures must be taken by persons of low and moderate income.
2. Special Program Requirements
(a) Maximum Grant Award: $1,000,000.
(b) Award of Grant : DECD reserves the right to refuse any and all applications and to make no award under this program.
(c) Leverage Ratio: Applicants must demonstrate committed match funds with at least a 5-to-1 ratio of other dollars to CDBG dollars. Applicants may utilize funds from any source (other than CDBG) to meet match requirement.
3. Selection Process:

Applications must include a development plan covering the following features:

minimum 200 acre park size (can include existing industrial park acreage) advanced telecommunications infrastructure advanced electric distribution facilities a campus-like atmosphere including efficient and attractive circulation systems for motorists and pedestrians, large landscaped lots and attractively landscaped common areas, underground utilities and architecturally controlled buildings and sites centralized water and sewage treatment facilities access to major transport systems access to essential community services

The successful application will demonstrate cooperation among applicant communities, identify demand for a super park facility, include a financial plan that has a high probability of success and outline a facility management capacity.

Phase I Application: No maximum length. The application deadline is August 1, 1998.

Each application will be rated in relation to all others. This is no minimum score for funding but the Office of Community Development reserves the right not to fund an application if it is deemed to be in the best interests of the State and the Community Development Block Grant Program.

(a) Management Plan: (15 points) - Description of the management and organizational structure to be used in the development and operation of the park.
(b) Development Plan: (25 points) - Preliminary site plan and description of facilities and amenities.
(c) Market Plan: (25 points).- Feasibility studies and market analysis demonstrating 1) the need for the park (suitable, available occupants). 2) availability of workforce, and 3) build-out rate scenarios.
(d) Financial Plan: (25 points) - Plan must include 1) demonstrated commitment of funds for leverage ratio, 2) community tax-sharing and TIF agreements, and 3) business plan for the park.
(e) Community Participation (10 points) - Projects including more than two communities will receive a higher point total.

19- 498 C.M.R. ch. 17, § 2