School personnel may consider any unique circumstances on a case-by- case basis when determining whether a change in placement, consistent with the other requirements of this section, is appropriate for a child with a disability who violates a code of student conduct.
For disciplinary changes in placement that would exceed 10 consecutive school days, if the behavior that gave rise to the violation of the school code is determined not to be a manifestation of the child's disability pursuant to paragraph (E) of this section, school personnel may apply the relevant disciplinary procedures to children with disabilities in the same manner and for the same duration as the procedures would be applied to children without disabilities, except as provided in paragraph (D) of this section.
If the SAU, the parent, and relevant members of the IEP Team make the determination that the conduct was a manifestation of the child's disability, the IEP Team must-
School personnel may remove a student to an interim alternative educational setting for not more than 45 school days without regard to whether the behavior is determined to be a manifestation of the child's disability, if the child-
On the date on which the decision is made to make a removal that constitutes a change of placement of a child with a disability because of a violation of a code of student conduct, the SAU must notify the parents of that decision, and provide the parents the procedural safeguards notice described in §300.504.
The child's IEP Team determines the interim alternative educational setting for services under §300.530(c), (d)(5), and (g).
The parent of a child with a disability who disagrees with any decision regarding placement under §§ 300.530 and 300.531, or the manifestation determination under §300.530(e), or an SAU that believes that maintaining the current placement of the child is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or others, may appeal the decision by requesting a hearing. The hearing is requested by filing a complaint pursuant to §§ 300.507 and 300.508(a) and (b).
When an appeal under §300.532 has been made by either the parent or the SAU, the child must remain in the interim alternative educational setting pending the decision of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the time period specified in §300.530(c) or (g), whichever occurs first, unless the parent and the SEA or SAU agree otherwise.
A child who has not been determined to be eligible for special education and related services under this part and who has engaged in behavior that violated a code of student conduct, may assert any of the protections provided for in this part if the public agency had knowledge (as determined in accordance with paragraph (B) of this section) that the child was a child with a disability before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred.
A public agency must be deemed to have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability if before the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred-
A public agency would not be deemed to have knowledge under paragraph (B) of this section if-
Nothing in this part prohibits an agency from reporting a crime committed by a child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law enforcement and judicial authorities from exercising their responsibilities with regard to the application of Federal and State law to crimes committed by a child with a disability.
For enforcement of a written agreement reached as a result of mediation or resolution meeting, the SEA offers to parents and adult students the State complaint investigation procedure. The State complaint investigation procedure is not mandatory and will not delay or deny a party the right to seek enforcement of the written mediation agreement or resolution meeting agreement in a court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States. [34 CFR 300.537 provides the State the option of including enforcement.]
05-071 C.M.R. ch. 101, § XVII