La. Admin. Code tit. 70 § IX-339
Exhibit 1 | |
Category I-Project Type | |
Points | |
A. Safety-Projects Directly Affecting Operational Safety | |
50 | Correction of runway failures severe enough to be an obvious safety problem. Runway friction surface or grooving or other action directly related to safety. Primary runway at rural airports. |
49 | Repair of primary runway lighting system or approach lighting system which is not functional and is deemed to be a safety hazard. |
48 | Obstruction removal which is requiring the displacement of the runway threshold and relocation of runway lighting. |
47 | Obstructions within the Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) or Penetrations to the Required FAR Part 77 20:1 Approach Slope Surface. |
46 | FAR Part 139 Certificated Airport ARFF vehicles and equipment required at commercial service airports or minimum safety equipment at GA airports to maintain current certificated FAA ARFF Index. Security fencing to correct a specific safety problem (does not include general perimeter fencing). |
45 | Safety condition identified by professional evaluation or accident statistics. |
B. Airside Preservation-Preserving the Infrastructure of the Airport Dealing with Air Operations. Examples are preserving and maintaining the infrastructure of the runways, taxiways, aircraft aprons, airfield lighting, N AVAIDs, Fuel Farms, T-Hangars, Sustainability Projects. | |
30 | Primary runway |
25 | Taxiway serving primary runway |
18 | Apron/Navigational Aids (NAVAIDS)/Sustainability and Innovation Projects |
17 | Secondary runway/ Wildlife/Safety Fencing* |
16 | Taxiway serving secondary runway |
15 | Stub taxiways and taxi-lanes |
*Justification and supporting airport documentation of wildlife hazards and prevention plans are required to receive points in this category. | |
C. Airside Improvements-Improving the Infrastructure of the Airport Dealing with Air Operations. Examples are improving and upgrading the infrastructure of the runways, taxiways, aircraft aprons, airfield lighting, NAVAIDs, Fuel Farms, T-Hangars, Approaches. | |
14 | Primary runway / Obstructions within the FAR Part 77 7:1 Transitional Slope Surfaces |
13 | Primary taxiway |
12 | Apron/Sustainability and Innovation Projects |
11 | Perimeter fencing |
10 | Navigational Aids (NAVAIDS) |
9 | Secondary runway |
8 | Secondary taxiway |
7 | Agricultural loading area |
6 | Noise Mitigation / Terminal Building for Air Carrier and General Aviation Airports / Hangars / Fuel Systems |
5 | New airport construction including runway, taxiway, and apron/Any additional ARFF vehicles or equipment beyond minimum requirements to meet current ARFF Index, Masterplans, Airport Layout Plans (ALPs), Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs), and Action Plans. |
D. Land Side Improvements-Improvements That Enhance an Airport's Infrastructure Not Related to the Air Side. | |
4 | Land acquisition not related to Airside Improvements for future expansion |
3 | Primary vehicle access road |
2 | Primary vehicle nonrevenue-generating parking. |
1 | Other Land Side Improvements |
Exhibit 2 | |
Category II-Facility Scoring | |
Based Aircraft* | Points |
91 or More | 20 |
81 to 90 | 18 |
71 to 80 | 16 |
61 to 70 | 14 |
51 to 60 | 12 |
41 to 50 | 10 |
31 to 40 | 8 |
21 to 30 | 6 |
11 to 20 | 4 |
1 to 10 | 2 |
Based Aircraft Type | Points |
5 or more Based Jet Aircraft | 10 |
>2 Based Jet Aircraft | 7 |
Exhibit 2 | |
Category II-Facility Scoring | |
At Least 1 Based Jet Aircraft | 3 |
0 Based Jet Aircraft | 0 |
Based Aircraft Type | Points |
>60.000 Annual Operations | 9 |
>25,000 but < 59,999 Annual Operations | 7 |
>15,000 but < 24,999 Annual Operations | 5 |
>10,000 but < 14,999 Annual Operations | 3 |
< 9,999 Annual Operations | 1 |
Airport Grant Performance Management** | Points |
No Grant Performance Discrepancies | 10 |
3 or Less Grant Performance Discrepancies | 5 |
More than 3 Grant Performance Discrepancies | 0 |
Airport Sponsor Responsiveness Management | Points |
Airport Sponsor Responsiveness (=/> 80 percent) | 20 |
Airport Sponsor Responsiveness (=/> 50 percent but <80 percent) | 10 |
Airport Sponsor Responsiveness (=/> 0 percent but <50 percent) | 0 |
*Taken from latest 5010 Inspection or the national based aircraft inventory **Airport Grant Performance Management History will score an airport sponsor on the proper state grant management including, but not limited to-promptness, accuracy, grant activity, and compliance with state grant assurance articles. Additionally, if an airport sponsor is declared in non-compliance with federal or state laws, regulations, rules or policies by the FAA, Louisiana Legislative Auditor, or DOTD within the previous fiscal year, the airport sponsor shall not be eligible to receive points in this category. Grant discrepancies will be recorded by the Operations Program. The timeframe for review will be over the prior two years of grant performance based on the state's fiscal year. | |
Exhibit 3 | |
Category III-Airport Sponsor Compliance | Points |
Height Limitation Zoning Ordinance < 10 Years Old | 10 |
Height Limitation Zoning Ordinance < 20 Years Old | 5 |
Height Limitation Zoning Ordinance >30 Years Old | 1 |
Land Use Compatibility Zoning | 5 |
5010 / Safety Inspection | Points |
5010 Inspection-Airport Basic Maintenance Scoring | |
No Basic Maintenance 5010 Repeat Discrepancies | 15 |
2 or Less Basic Maintenance Repeat Discrepancies | 7 |
More than 2 Basic Maintenance Repeat Discrepancies | 0 |
5010 Inspection-Airport Self-Inspection Scoring | |
Daily Pavement Inspections (Documented) | 20 |
3 Times per week Pavement Inspections (Documented) | 15 |
Monthly Pavement Inspections (Documented) | 10 |
Annual Pavement Inspections (Documented) | 5 |
No Pavement Inspections (Documented) | 0 |
5010 Inspection-Maintenance Items Repaired Scoring | |
Maintenance Discrepancy Items Repaired within required time frame | 20 |
Maintenance Discrepancy Items Repaired outside of time frame | 10 |
Maintenance Discrepancy Items Not Repaired | 0 |
Louisiana Aviation System Plan Standards | Points |
Improves LASP Performance Measure | 10 |
Meets LASP Standard Performance Measure | 3 |
Airport CIP and Planning Sustainability | Points |
CIP Consistency Maintained-Airport Project Adheres to 3 Year Planning Cycle* | 15 |
*Planning cycle shall be verified and certified by DOTD to award points in this category to an airport project application. | |
Exhibit 4 | |
Category IV-Special Considerations | Points |
Designated as Special Program* | 15 |
Economic Development Potential** | 10 |
Airport Sponsor Local Funding Contribution *** | 1-59 |
General Aviation Airport Certification Program**** | 0-30 |
*Special Program-Certain types of projects mandated by Federal or State law or identified in a policy decision by DOTD. For example, if the EPA requires a certain kind of wash down facility, it could be given added priority with bonus points. DOTD may place emphasis on a particular type of project, e.g., hazard removal around the state, subsequent phase of a project continuation, project supported and encouraged by the Louisiana Airport System Plan, these types of projects could receive Special Program points. **Economic Development-Clearly demonstrated impact on economic development in an industrial airpark or around the airport locale. For example, a taxiway to open industrial airpark access would get bonus points, but a taxiway to a T-Hangar area would not. A runway project to accommodate corporate aircraft would need to be thoroughly documented that it was a major factor in the location of the business. To receive bonus points in this category an economic impact study may be required, the cost of which is the responsibility of the airport owner. ***Airport Sponsor Local Funding Contribution- Airport Sponsors that clearly demonstrate their intention of providing local financial support for a project through documentation via a resolution shall receive incentive points toward a single project request in accordance with the following criteria: For every percent that an airport sponsor contributes to the total amount of the project (including all phases of the project) in accordance with the airport construction and development priority program, 1 point will be awarded for percentages between .02 percent - .08 percent and will be calculated as 0.2 percent = 1 point; 0.4 percent = 2 points; 0.6 percent = 3 points; 0.8 percent = 4 points; For every percentage point from 1 percent to 50 percent, beginning at 1 percent = 10 points and 1 point thereafter will be awarded for each percentage. For example-if an airport is requesting a $500,000 total project, and contributes 0.6 percent or ($3,000), then the project will be awarded 3 points toward the total project score. Another example is, if an airport is requesting a $500,000 project and contributes 12 percent ($60,000), then the project will be awarded 21 points toward the total project score. ****Airports that elect to and are approved to participate in the GAAC Pilot Program will be eligible for points awarded under this category in accordance with the GAAC Pilot Program. | |
Project Priority Evaluation Worksheet | |
Project Number* | Date Evaluated |
Airport Name | |
Description of Work | |
Category I: Project Type | Score |
Safety | |
Airside Preservation | |
Airside Improvements | |
Landside Improvements | |
Total | |
Category II: Facility Score | |
Based Aircraft | |
Based Aircraft Type | |
Airport Operations | |
Airport Grant Performance | |
Airport Sponsor Responsiveness Management | |
Total | |
Project Priority Evaluation Worksheet | |
Category III: Airport Sponsor Responsibility | |
Height Limitation Zoning | |
Land Use Zoning | |
5010 / Safety Inspection | |
Louisiana Aviation System Plan Standards | |
Total | |
Category IV: Special Considerations | |
Special Program | |
Economic Development | |
Commercial Service | |
Airport Sponsor Local Funding Contribution | |
General Aviation Airport Certification Program | |
Total | |
Project Total Evaluation Score | Total |
Louisiana Airport Construction and Development Priority Program Project Application Form | ||
Airport Sponsor: Airport: No. and Street/P.O. Box: City, State, Zip Code: | ||
Project Title/Description | Funding Year Requested: | |
(As listed on CIP) | (As listed on the CIP) | |
Project Scope and Justification | ||
(Provide detailed explanation documenting the need and how the project meets the need. (Refer to Louisiana Administrative Code Title 70, Part IX § 315.C for additional guidance.) | ||
Estimated Project Cost (If applicable, attach a detailed construction cost estimate) | ||
Classification | Estimated Cost | |
Administrative Expenses | $ | |
Land Acquisition Cost | $ | |
Engineering Fees | $ | |
Survey | $ | |
Geotechnical | $ | |
Estimated Construction Cost | $ | |
Construction Inspection | $ | |
Construction Administration Fees | $ | |
Construction Testing | $ | |
Equipment Purchase Cost | $ | |
Other: (define) | $ | |
Other: (define) | $ | |
Total Estimated Project Cost | $ | |
Funding Sources | ||
Source | percent Contribution | Funds |
Federal Funds | $ | |
State Funds | $ | |
Local Contribution | $ | |
Other: (define) | $ | |
Total Estimated Project Cost | $ | |
Attach the Following: (as identified in LAC 70:IX.307 and 315) | ||
Sketch of Project(s) on the airport's approved Airport Layout Plan Any additional information necessary for prioritization, i.e., Detailed Construction Cost Estimate, Resolution for Local Funds Contribution, Additional Documentation providing Justification for the Project, Environmental Clearance Documentation. | ||
La. Admin. Code tit. 70, § IX-339