Section 312 IAC 25-4-115 - Review, public participation, and approval or disapproval of permit applications; permit terms and conditions; permit approval or denialAuthority: IC 14-34-2-1
Affected: IC 14-34
Sec. 115.
(a) No permit application or application for a significant revision of a permit shall be approved unless the application affirmatively demonstrates, and the director makes written findings on the basis of information set forth in the application or from information otherwise available that is documented in the approval, the following: (1) The permit application is accurate and complete and in compliance with all requirements of IC 14-34, the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 ( 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.), and this article.(2) The applicant has demonstrated that reclamation, as required by IC 14-34, the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 ( 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.), and this article, can be accomplished under the reclamation plan contained in the permit application.(3) The proposed permit area is shown not within an area: (A) under study or administrative proceedings under a petition filed under 312 IAC 25-3-6 through 312 IAC 25-3-12 to have an area designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations unless the applicant demonstrates that before January 4, 1977, substantial legal and financial commitments had been made in relation to the operation covered by the permit application; or(B) designated as unsuitable for mining under 312 IAC 25-3.(4) For mining operations where the private mineral estate to be mined has been severed from the private surface estate, the applicant has submitted to the director the documentation required under section 19(b) or 60(b) of this rule.(5) The assessment of the probable cumulative impacts of all anticipated coal mining in the cumulative impact area on the hydrologic balance, as described in sections 47(c) and 85(c) of this rule, has been made by the director, and the operations proposed under the application have been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit area.(6) The applicant has demonstrated that any existing structure will comply with the applicable performance standards of 312 IAC 25-6-5 through 312 IAC 25-6-148 and section 116 of this rule.(7) The applicant has paid all reclamation fees required by 312 IAC 25-10 and all reclamation fees from previous and existing operations as required by 30 CFR 870.12.(8) The applicant has satisfied the applicable requirements of section 98 of this rule with respect to special categories of mining.(9) The applicant has, if applicable, satisfied the requirements for approval of a long term, intensive agricultural postmining land use, in accordance with the requirements of 312 IAC 25-6-54 or 312 IAC 25-6-115.(10) The operation would not affect the continued existence of endangered or threatened species, or result in destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitats, as determined under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).(11) The effect has been taken into account of the proposed mining operation on properties or sites eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or the Indiana state register of historic sites and structures. This finding may be supported in part by the inclusion of appropriate permit conditions or changes in the operation plan to protect these properties or sites or by a documented decision that no additional protection measures are necessary. In making this finding, the director shall take into account the following: (A) The relative importance of the property or site to other properties or sites of a similar nature in Indiana that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places or on the Indiana state register of historic sites and structures based upon information available from the division of historic preservation and archeology of the department.(B) The estimated cost of any treatment or mitigation measures required by the director. The estimate shall be provided by the applicant and shall be prepared by a person qualified as a principal investigator at 312 IAC 21-3-4. The estimate shall be accompanied by the scope of work and any other documents that provide the basis for that estimate. A decision that treatment or mitigation measures are not required shall not be based on cost alone.(12) For a proposed remining operation where the applicant intends to reclaim under 312 IAC 25-6-53 or 312 IAC 25-6-114, the site of the operation is a previously mined area as defined in 312 IAC 25-1-107.(13) For permits to be issued under section 105.5 of this rule, the permit application must contain the following: (A) Lands eligible for remining.(B) An identification of any potential environmental and safety problems related to prior mining activity that could reasonably be anticipated to occur at the site.(C) Mitigation plans to sufficiently address potential environmental and safety problems so that reclamation as required by the applicable requirements of the regulatory program can be accomplished.(b) If the director decides to approve the application, the applicant will submit the performance bond or other equivalent guarantee required under 312 IAC 25-5 prior to the issuance of the permit.(c) After an application is approved, but before the permit is issued, the director shall reconsider the decision to approve the application based on the compliance review required by section 114(b)(1) of this rule in light of any new information submitted under sections 17 and 18 of this rule.Natural Resources Commission; 312 IAC 25-4-115; filed Jun 21, 2001, 2:53 p.m.: 24 IR 3489, eff Dec 1, 2001; filed Apr 1, 2004, 3:00 p.m.: 27 IR 2453, eff Jan 1, 2005; readopted filed May 29, 2007, 9:51 a.m.: 20070613-IR-312070146RFA; readopted filed Sep 19, 2013, 10:12 a.m.: 20131016-IR-312130125RFAReadopted filed 3/26/2019, 3:40 p.m.: 20190424-IR-312190011RFA