EXAMPLE 1. Assume Partnership A, an investment partnership, consists of equal partners B and C. Partner B is a partnership and Partner C is a nonresident individual. In addition, assume that both Partnership A and Partner B are commercially domiciled in Illinois and that neither Partnership A nor Partner B has made the election under IITA Section 201(p) to be subject to PTE tax. For its taxable year ending December 31, 2023, Partnership A's income consists of the following:
Dividends | $200 |
Capital gains | $1,200 |
Distributive share income: | |
Business income apportioned to Illinois (305(a)) | $600 |
Nonbusiness rent income from IL real estate (303) | $400 |
$1,000 | |
Total | $2,400 |
Partnership A computes withholding tax of $49.50. Tax is computed on the sum of $600 apportioned to Illinois under IITA Section 305(a) and the $400 allocated to Illinois under IITA Section 305(b), multiplied by the 4.95% individual rate of its partners (including Partner B). Partner C may not claim credit under IITA Section 709.5(b) for its respective share of withholding tax.
Because Partner B is not an investment partnership, it is not subject to withholding tax under IITA Section 709.5(d). However, as Partner B is commercially domiciled in Illinois, it is subject to replacement tax on its $500 distributive share (along with any other sources of Illinois net income) and may be subject to withholding under IITA Section 709.5(a) with respect to other sources of income. Under the provisions of IITA Section 305(c-5), Partner B's distributive share is deemed nonbusiness income and allocable to the taxpayer's commercial domicile. Therefore, all of Partner B's distributive share is subject to replacement tax and not just its share of $500 on which Partnership A paid withholding tax. Under subsection (f)(5), Partner B may claim a credit for the tax withheld on its distributive share. IITA Section 709.5(b) and Section 100.7035(d)(1) allow Partner B to claim a credit against its withholding obligation under IITA Section 709.5(a) in lieu of claiming the credit against its liability under IITA Section 201. If Partner B has Illinois resident partners, those partners may not claim credit under subsection (f)(4) for any amount claimed as a credit by Partner B against its liability as provided in Section 100.7035(d)(1).
EXAMPLE 2. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Partnership A also has distributive share of nonbusiness rental losses of $200 from Illinois real estate under IITA Sections 305(b) and 303. In computing the required amount of withholding, Partnership A's distributive share of Illinois source losses distributable to its nonresident partners may be netted against its distributive share of Illinois source income distributable to its nonresident partners. Therefore, Partnership A computes withholding tax of $39.60. Tax is computed on the sum of $600 apportioned to Illinois under IITA Section 305(a) and the $400 allocated to Illinois under IITA Section 305(b), less the $200 allocated to Illinois under IITA Section 305(b), multiplied by the 4.95% individual rate of its partners (including Partner B). Partner C may not claim credit under IITA Section 709.5(b) for its respective share of withholding tax.
EXAMPLE 3. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Partnership A has $5 of an IITA Article 2 credit passed through from Partnership Z, which is first allowable against the tax liability of Partnership A for its tax year ending on December 31, 2023, and $200 of an Article 2 credit passed through from Partnership Z carried over from its tax year ending on December 31, 2022. Partnership A computes withholding tax of $44.50, the $49.50 determined as provided in Example 1 less the $5 Article 2 credit passed through from Partnership Z.
EXAMPLE 4. Assume the same facts as in Example 1, except that Partnership A has $3,000 of an Article 2 credit passed through from Partnership Z which is first allowable against the tax liability of Partnership A for its tax year ending on December 31, 2023. Partnership A would compute no withholding tax. Partnership A may not use the excess credit amount against any future withholding tax obligation.
EXAMPLE 5. Assume Partnership A, an investment partnership, consists of equal partners B, C, and D. Partner B is itself an investment partnership, whose partners include resident individuals E and F, and nonresident individual G. Partners C and D are nonresident individuals. In addition, assume that both Partnership A and Partner B are commercially domiciled in Illinois and that neither Partnership A nor Partner B has made the election under IITA Section 201(p) to be subject to PTE tax. For its taxable year ending December 31, 2023, Partnership A's income consists of the following:
Dividends | $500 |
Capital gains | $1,000 |
Distributive share income: | |
Business income apportioned to Illinois (305(a)) | $800 |
Nonbusiness dividend income (305(b), 301(c)(2)) | $100 |
Nonbusiness rent income from IL real estate (303) | $400 |
$1,300 | |
Total | $2,800 |
Partnership A computes withholding tax of $59.40. Tax is computed on the sum of $800 apportioned to Illinois under IITA Section 305(a) and the $400 allocated to Illinois under IITA Section 305(b), multiplied by the 4.95% individual rate of its partners (including Partner B). Partners C and D may not claim credit under IITA Section 709.5(b) for their respective shares of withholding tax.
Partner B, an investment partnership, owes no withholding tax. Although Partner B, but for the provisions of IITA Section 305(c-5), has total income apportioned to Illinois under IITA Section 305(a) and (b) of $400, $133.33 of which is distributable to nonresident individual G, resulting in a withholding tax of $6.60, Partner B is allowed a credit under subsection (f)(3) against its withholding obligation under this Section of $6.60. In addition, resident individuals E and F may each claim a credit under subsection (f)(4) of $6.60 against their liability under IITA Section 201 for their taxable year in which their distributive shares of Partner B's income is included in base income. The credit shall be applied as provided in IITA Section 709.5(b).
EXAMPLE 6. Assume the same facts as in Example 5, except that Partnership A makes the election under IITA Section 201(p) to be subject to PTE tax for its tax year ending December 31, 2023. Making the election does not exempt Partnership A from the requirement to withhold under IITA Section 709.5(d). However, Partnership A may elect to subtract its income subject to withholding in computing its base income under IITA Section 201(p)(3). Therefore, Partnership A's base income for purposes of computing PTE tax is $1,600 ($2,800 - $1,200). If Partner B also makes the election under IITA Section 201(p), it subtracts its distributive share of Partnership A's income in computing its base income under IITA Section 201(p)(3).
EXAMPLE 7. Assume the same facts as in Example 5, except that Partner B is a corporation that is commercially domiciled outside of Illinois. In addition, assume that Partner B makes the election under IITA Section 1501(a)(1) to treat all of its income as business income. Partnership A computes withholding tax of $77.60. Tax is computed on the sum of $800 apportioned to Illinois under IITA Section 305(a) and the $400 allocated to Illinois under IITA Section 305(b), multiplied by the 9.5% rate applicable to Partner B's distributive share and the 4.95% rate applicable to Partners C and D's distributive shares. Partners C and D are not allowed a credit under IITA Section 709.5(b) for their respective shares of withholding tax. Under IITA Section 305(c-5), Partner B's distributive share is treated as business income and apportioned as if Partner B received the income directly (rather than as a distributive share of Partnership A's income). Therefore, Partner B's Illinois net income includes its $267 distributive share of Partnership A's distributive share of business income (one-third of $800). Partner B may treat its $38 share of tax withheld by Partnership A as a credit as provided in IITA Section 709.5(b) and Section 100.7035(d). Partner B's distributive share of Partnership A's other items of income is deemed business income and apportioned using Partner's apportionment factor.
EXAMPLE 8. Assume Partnership A is an investment partnership and has income subject to withholding of $1,000. Investment Partnership A consists of Partner B, who is itself an investment partnership and whose partners include Partner C, a corporation. Investment Partnership A is not required to withhold with respect to Investment Partnership B's share, but if it does withhold at the 4.95% rate, then Investment Partnership B may use that amount as a credit against its own withholding tax liability. In this scenario, Investment Partnership B has income subject to withholding with respect to its distributive share of Investment Partnership A's income subject to withholding. Under IITA Section 709.5(d)(1) and Section 100.3500(b)(3) of this Part, Investment Partnership B has income that would, but for the provisions of IITA Section 305(c-5), be apportioned or allocated under IITA Section 305(a) or (b). Therefore, Investment Partnership B owes withholding tax of 9.5% on Corporate Partner C's distributive share less any credit for the share of withholding tax paid by Investment Partnership A.
Ill. Admin. Code tit. 86, § 100.7034