D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 6, r. 6-B3725

Current through Register Vol. 71, No. 42, October 18, 2024

Rule 6-B3725 - PRECEDENTS

3725.1

Provided that copies have been filed by the Commission with the Chief Administrative Law Judge in the Office of Administrative Hearings and maintained and made reasonably available for review, each Administrative Law Judge shall be deemed to be on notice of the following:

(a) The Commission's decisions in proceedings;

(b) The Commission's evaluations of Administrative Law Judges who have been candidates for reappointment; and

(c) Any written communication by the Commission to the Chief Administrative Law Judge specifying that Administrative Law Judges are to take notice of the communication.

3725.2

Each Administrative Law Judge shall be deemed to be on notice of any code of professional responsibility for Administrative Law Judges promulgated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge under section 8(a)(9) of the Act, D.C. Official Code § 2-1831.05(a)(9), and any interpretative authorities cited therein as persuasive or authoritative.

3725.3

Each Administrative Law Judge shall be deemed to be on notice of Administrative Orders and other issuances of the Chief Administrative Law Judge so long as such documents are maintained by the Office of Administrative Hearings and made reasonably available for review.

3725.4

To the extent a document covered by this section has been redacted, an Administrative Law Judge shall not be deemed to be on notice of the redacted material unless he or she has received it separately.

D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 6, r. 6-B3725

Emergency and Proposed Rulemaking published at 50 DCR 8619 (October 10, 2003) [EXPIRED]; as amended by Emergency and Proposed Rulemaking published at 51 DCR 990 (January 23, 2004) [EXPIRED]; as amended by Final Rulemaking published at 51 DCR 7033 (July 16, 2004)