D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 27, r. 27-217
Current through Register Vol. 71, No. 43, October 25, 2024
Rule 27-217 - ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION217.1 Availability of ADR procedures. The Board will make its services available for ADR proceedings in contract appeals and protest matters involving District agencies.
(a) ADR subsequent to docketing of case at the Board. Parties are encouraged to consider the feasibility of using ADR as soon as their case is docketed. If, however, at any time during the course of a Board proceeding, the parties agree that their dispute may be resolved through the use of an ADR technique, the presiding judge may suspend proceedings for a reasonable period of time while the parties and the Board attempt to resolve the dispute in this manner. The use of an ADR technique will not toll any relevant statutory time limit for deciding the case.(b) Other ADR. Upon request, the Board will make a Board Neutral available for an ADR proceeding involving a District agency in any contract, protest, or procurement matter at any stage of a procurement, even if no contracting officer decision has been issued or is contemplated. To initiate an ADR proceeding, the parties shall jointly request the ADR in writing and direct such request to the Chief Administrative Judge. The Board will provide ADR services on a reimbursable basis.217.2 Conduct of ADR.
(a) Selection of Board Neutral. If ADR is agreed to by the parties and the Board, the parties may request the appointment of one or more Board judges to act as a Board Neutral or Neutrals. The parties shall request that the Chief Administrative Judge appoint a particular judge or judges as the Board Neutral, or appoint any judge or judges as the Neutral. If, when ADR has been requested for a case that has already been docketed with the Board, as provided in Subsection 217.1(a), the parties may request that the presiding judge serve as the Board Neutral. In such situation, when the ADR is unsuccessful, (i) if the ADR has involved mediation, the presiding judge shall not retain the case, and (ii) if the ADR has not involved mediation, the presiding judge, after considering the parties' views, shall decide whether to retain the case.(b) Retention and confidentiality of materials. The Board will review materials submitted by a party for an ADR proceeding, but will not retain such materials after the proceeding is concluded or otherwise terminated. Material created by a party for the purpose of an ADR proceeding is to be used solely for that proceeding unless the parties agree otherwise. Parties may request a protective order in an ADR proceeding in the manner provided in Section 104.217.3 Types of ADR. ADR is not defined by any single procedure or set of procedures. The Board will consider the use of any technique proposed by the parties which is deemed to be fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the parties, the Board, and the resolution of disputes. The following are examples of available techniques:
(a) Mediation. The Board Neutral, as mediator, aids the parties in settling their case. The mediator engages in ex parte discussions with the parties and facilitates the transmission of settlement offers. Although not authorized to render a decision in the dispute, the mediator may discuss with the parties, on a confidential basis, the strengths and weaknesses of their positions. No judge who has participated in discussions about the mediation will participate in a Board decision of the case if the ADR is unsuccessful.(b) Neutral case evaluation. The parties agree to present to the Board Neutral information on which the Board Neutral bases a non-binding, oral, advisory opinion. The manner in which the information is presented will vary from case to case depending upon the agreement of the parties. Presentations generally fall between two extremes, ranging from an informal proffer of evidence together with limited argument from the parties to a more formal presentation of oral and documentary evidence and argument from counsel, such as through a mini-trial.(c) Binding decision. One or more Board judges render a decision which, by prior agreement of the parties, is to be binding and non-appealable. As in the non-binding evaluation of a case by a Board Neutral, the manner in which information is presented for a binding decision may vary depending on the circumstances of the particular case.(d) Other procedures. In addition to other ADR techniques, including modifications to those listed above, as agreed to by the Board and parties, the parties may use ADR techniques that do not require direct Board involvement.(e) Selective use of standard procedures. Parties considering the use of ADR are encouraged to adapt for their purposes any provisions in the Board's rules which they believe will be useful. This includes but is not limited to provisions concerning record submittal, prehearing discovery procedures, and hearings.D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 27, r. 27-217
Final Rulemaking published at 49 DCR 2078 (March 8, 2002); amended by Final Rulemaking published at 67 DCR 1734 (4/6/2020)