D.C. Mun. Regs. r. 27-104

Current through Register Vol. 71, No. 24, June 14, 2024
Rule 27-104 - PROTECTIVE ORDERS; IN CAMERA REVIEW
104.1
(a) At the request of a party to a protest or appeal or on its own initiative, the Board may issue a protective order controlling the treatment of protected information. Such information may include proprietary, confidential, or source-selection-sensitive material, as well as other information the release of which could result in a competitive advantage to one or more firms. The protective order shall establish procedures for application for access to protected information, identification and safeguarding of that information, and submission of redacted copies of documents omitting protected information. For informational purposes only, a sample protective order, as well as sample applications for access to materials under a protective order, are available on the Board's website: www.cab.dc.gov.
(b) If a party to a protest or appeal seeks to have its initial filing in a case sealed, it must submit with the filing a motion for a protective order pursuant to this Rule, or submit an explicit request for a protective order in the filing, as well as a redacted copy of the filing that would be accessible to the public. If, a party seeks to have a subsequent filing or specified exhibits sealed, it must first file a motion for a protective order pursuant to this rule. Redacted copies of the exhibits need not be submitted, however. Only the specific document or exhibit that is to be filed under seal shall be designated as sealed. For any party that has not been allowed access under the protective order, the filing party shall serve notice of the filing and that the served party must request admission under the protective order to access the documents filed.
(c) If no protective order has been issued, the agency may withhold from the parties those portions of a document submission which would ordinarily be subject to a protective order. The Board will review in camera all information not released to the parties.
(d) After a protective order has been issued, counsel or consultants retained by counsel appearing on behalf of a party may apply for admission under the protective order by submitting an application to the Board, with copies furnished simultaneously to all parties. The application shall establish that the applicant is not involved in competitive decision making for any firm that could gain a competitive advantage from access to the protected information and that there will be no significant risk of inadvertent disclosure of protected information. Objections to an applicant's admission shall be raised within two (2) days after receipt of the application, although the Board may consider objections raised after that time.
(e) Any violation of the terms of a protective order may result in the imposition of sanctions as the Board deems appropriate, including referral to appropriate bar associations or other disciplinary bodies and restricting the violator's practice before the Board.
104.2

At the request of a party or on its own initiative, the Board may order that specific documents or tangible articles be submitted for in camera review by the Board, and not be available for inspection, if they are asserted to contain privileged information. A party by motion may challenge another party's assertion of privilege.

104.3

Information subject to a protective order under this Rule may be used in any appellate matter filed with the Superior Court of the District of Columbia or the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (collectively, "Court"), without the Board's prior authorization, provided that the information is filed under seal with the Court, that the Court is informed by the Appellant(s) of the Board's protective order, and that the Appellant(s) request the Court to issue its own protective order to cover the protected material. Use of information protected under the Board's protective order in such appellate proceedings will be governed by the protective order issued by the Court.

D.C. Mun. Regs. r. 27-104

Final Rulemaking published at 49 DCR 2078 (March 8, 2002); amended by Final Rulemaking published at 67 DCR 1734 (4/6/2020)