24 Del. Admin. Code §§ 2500-2.0

Current through Register Vol. 27, No. 12, June 1, 2024

Section 2500-2.0 - Grounds for Disciplinary Proceeding

2.1 Conduct that may merit discipline pursuant to 24 Del.C. § 2518(a) includes but is not limited to the following act(s):

2.1.1 Knowingly engaging in any activity which violates state and federal laws and regulations governing the practice of pharmacy;

2.1.2 Knowingly dispensing an outdated or questionable product;

2.1.3 Knowingly dispensing the cheaper product and charging third party vendors for a more expensive product;

2.1.4 Knowingly charging for more dosage units than is actually dispensed;

2.1.5 Knowingly altering prescriptions or other records which the law requires the pharmacies or pharmacists to maintain;

2.1.6 Knowingly dispensing medication without proper authorization;

2.1.7 Knowingly defrauding any persons or government agency receiving pharmacy services;

2.1.8 Placing a signature on any affidavit pertaining to any phase of the practice of pharmacy which the pharmacist knows to contain false information.

2.1.9 Fraudulently altering or forging the contents of prescriptions;

2.1.10 Payment of money or the providing of free services to a third party in return for the third party's referral of patients to the pharmacist or pharmacy;

2.1.11 Dispensing any legend drugs either for personal use or for use by another person without a valid order from a prescriber. Valid prescription means that it is not only written correctly, but is for a medical use (i.e. prescriptions written "as directed" are prohibited);

2.1.12 Unauthorized substitution;

2.1.13 Dispensing medications which are not approved for marketing by the Food and Drug Administration nor approved for marketing by State law;

2.1.14 Continuous failure to correct violations of Statutes and Regulations noted in Board of Pharmacy communication;

2.1.15 Knowingly allowing persons who are not registered pharmacists to dispense medication without proper supervision;

2.1.16 Knowingly committing a fraudulent act. This would include destroying or altering any records such as prescriptions, profiles, third party vouchers and receipts;

2.1.17 Knowingly misbranding a drug by using a brand name when a generic is dispensed;

2.1.18 Practicing under the influence of drugs or alcohol;

2.1.19 The placement of an advertisement which the pharmacist knows to be false or misleading;

2.1.20 Knowingly breaching confidentiality of the patient/pharmacist relationship by supplying information to unauthorized persons;

2.1.21 Engaging in activities that would discredit the profession of pharmacy;

2.1.22 Attempting to circumvent the patient counseling requirements or discouraging the patients from receiving patient counseling concerning their prescription drug orders; and.

2.1.23 Using facsimile equipment to circumvent documentation, authenticity, verification or other standards of pharmacy or drug diversion.

2.2 Pharmacists may, in good faith and upon reasonable belief, withhold suspected forged prescriptions for release to law enforcement. When, in the judgment of the pharmacist, it is not prudent or possible to retain a suspected forged prescription, the pharmacist may exercise the option of making and retaining a copy of the prescription for release to law enforcement. Reporting the incident to law enforcement supports the personal responsibility of the dispensing pharmacist to be constantly vigilant against forged or altered prescriptions.

24 Del. Admin. Code §§ 2500-2.0

4 DE Reg. 163 (7/1/00)
11 DE Reg. 222 (08/01/07)