Step 1: The system shall conduct two six month initial monitoring periods by January 1, 1993.
Step 2: The system shall complete corrosion control studies, subsection 10.3.3, in 18 months, by July 1, 1994.
Step 3: The Division shall designate optimal corrosion control treatment, subsection 10.3.4, in 6 months, by January 1, 1995.
Step 4: The system shall install optimal corrosion control treatment, subsection 10.3.5, in 24 months, by January 1, 1997.
Step 5: The system shall complete follow-up sampling, subsection 10.7.4.2 and subsection 10.8.3, in 12 months, by January 1, 1998
Step 6: The Division shall review installation of treatment and designate optimal water quality control parameters, subsection 10.3.6, in 6 months, by July 1, 1998.
Step 7: The system shall operate in compliance with the Division-specified optimal water quality control parameters, subsection 10.3 .7, and continue to conduct tap sampling, subsection 10.7.4 and subsection 10.8.4.
Step 1: The system shall conduct initial tap sampling, subsection 10.7.4.1 and subsection 10.8.2, until the system either exceeds the lead or copper action level or becomes eligible for reduced monitoring under subsection 10.7.4.4. A system exceeding the lead or copper action level shall recommend optimal corrosion control treatment, subsection 10.3.1, within six months after the end of the monitoring period during which it exceeds one of the action levels.
Step 2: Within 12 months after the end of the monitoring period during which a system exceeds the lead or copper action level, the Division may require the system to perform corrosion control studies (subsection 10.3.2). If the Division does not require the system to perform such studies, the Division shall specify optimal corrosion control treatment, (subsection 10.3.4) within the following time frames.
Step 3: If the Division requires a system to perform corrosion control studies under step 2, the system shall complete the studies, subsection 10.3.3, within 18 months after the Division requires that such studies be conducted.
Step 4: If the system has performed corrosion control studies under step 2, the Division shall designate optimal corrosion control treatment, subsection 10.3.4, within 6 months after completion of step 3.
Step 5: The system shall install optimal corrosion control treatment, subsection 10.3.5, within 24 months after the Division designates optimal corrosion control treatment.
Step 6: The system shall complete follow-up sampling, subsection 10.7.4.2 and subsection 10.8.3, within 36 months after the Division designates optimal corrosion control treatment.
Step 7: The Division shall review the system's installation of treatment and designate optimal water quality control parameters, subsection 10.3.6, within 6 months after completion of Step 6.
Step 8: The system shall operate in compliance with the Division-designated optimal water quality control parameters, subsection 10.3 .7, and continue to conduct tap sampling, subsection 10.7.4.3 and subsection 10.8.4.
Lead;
Copper;
pH;
Alkalinity;
Calcium;
Conductivity;
Orthophosphate (when an inhibitor containing a phosphate compound is used);
Silicate (when an inhibitor containing a silicate compound is used);
Water temperature.
Step 1: A system exceeding the lead or copper action level shall complete lead and copper source water monitoring (subsection 10.9 .2) and make a treatment recommendation to the Division (subsection 10.4.2.1) no later than 180 days after the end of the monitoring period during which the lead or copper action level was exceeded.
Step 2: The Division shall make a determination regarding source water treatment, subsection 10.4.2.2 within 6 months after submission of monitoring results under step 1.
Step 3: If the Division requires installation of source water treatment, the system shall install the treatment, subsection 10.4.2.3, within 24 months after completion of step 2.
Step 4: The system shall complete follow-up tap water monitoring, subsection 10.7.4.2, and source water monitoring, subsection 10.9 .3, within 36 months after completion of step 2.
Step 5: The Division shall review the system's installation and operation of source water treatment and specify maximum permissible source water levels for lead and copper, subsection 10.4.2.4, within 6 months after completion of step 4.
Step 6: The system shall operate in compliance with the Division-specified maximum permissible lead and copper source water levels, subsection 10.4.2.4, and continue source water monitoring, subsection 10.9 .4.
System Size (No. people served) | No. of sites (Standard monitoring) | No. of sites (Reduced monitoring) |
>100,000 | 100 | 50 |
10,001-100,000 | 60 | 30 |
3,301-10,000 | 40 | 20 |
501-3,300 | 20 | 10 |
101-500 | 10 | 5 |
<100 | 5 | 5 |
System Size (No. people served) | First six-month monitoring period begins on |
>50,000 | January 1, 1992 |
3,301-50,000 | July 1, 1992 |
<3,300 | July 1, 1993 |
System Size (No. people served) | No. sites for water quality parameters |
>100,000 | 25 |
10,001-100,000 | 10 |
3,301-10,000 | 3 |
501-3,300 | 2 |
101-500 | 1 |
<100 | 1 |
pH;
Alkalinity;
Orthophosphate, when an inhibitor containing a phosphate compound is used;
Silica, when an inhibitor containing a silicate compound is used;
Calcium;
Conductivity; and
Water Temperature.
pH;
Alkalinity;
Orthophosphate, when an inhibitor containing a phosphate compound is used;
Silica, when an inhibitor containing a silicate compound is used;
Calcium, when calcium carbonate stabilization is used as part of corrosion control.
pH;
When alkalinity is adjusted as part of optimal corrosion control, a reading of the dosage rate of the chemical used to adjust alkalinity, and the alkalinity concentration; and
When a corrosion inhibitor is used as part of optimal corrosion control, a reading of the dosage rate of the inhibitor used, and the concentration of orthophosphate or silica (whichever is applicable).
System Size (No. people served) | Reduced no. of sites for water quality parameters |
>100,000 | 10 |
10,001-100,000 | 7 |
3,301-10,000 | 3 |
501-3,300 | 2 |
101-500 | 1 |
<100 | 1 |
Summary of monitoring requirements for water quality parameters1
Monitoring | Parameters2 | Location | Frequency |
Initial monitoring | pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or silica3, calcium, conductivity, temperature | Taps and at entry point(s) to the distribution system. | Every 6 months. |
After installation of corrosion control | pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or silica3, calcium4. pH, alkalinity, dosage rate and concentration (if alkalinity adjusted as part of corrosion control), inhibitor dosage rate and inhibitor residual5. | Taps Entry point(s) to the distribution system6. | Every 6 months. No less frequently than every two weeks. |
After the Division specifies parameter values for optimal corrosion control. | pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or silica3, calcium4. pH, alkalinity, dosage rate and concentration (if alkalinity adjusted as part of corrosion control), inhibitor dosage rate and inhibitor residual5. | Taps Entry point(s) to the distribution system6. | Every 6 months. No less frequently than every two weeks. |
Reduced monitoring | pH, alkalinity, orthophosphate or silica3, calcium4. pH, alkalinity, dosage rate and concentration (if alkalinity adjusted as part of corrosion control), inhibitor dosage rate and inhibitor residual5. | Taps Entry point(s) to the distribution system6. | Every 6 months, annually7 or every 3 years8; at reduced number of sites. No less frequently than every two weeks. |
1 Table is for illustrative purposes; consult the text of this section for precise regulatory requirements.
2 Small and medium-size systems have to monitor for water quality parameters only during monitoring periods in which the system exceeds the lead or copper action level.
3 Orthophosphate must be measured only when an inhibitor containing a phosphate compound is used. Silica must be measured only when an inhibitor containing silicate compound is used.
4 Calcium must be measured only when calcium carbonate stabilization is used as part of corrosion control.
5 Inhibitor dosage rates and inhibitor residual concentrations (orthophosphate or silica) must be measured only when an inhibitor is used.
6 Groundwater systems may limit monitoring to representative locations throughout the system.
7 Water systems may reduce frequency of monitoring for water quality parameters at the tap from every 6 months to annually if they have maintained the range of values for water quality parameters reflecting optimal corrosion control during three consecutive years of monitoring.
8 Water systems may further reduce the frequency of monitoring for water quality parameters at the tap from annually to once every three years if they have maintained the range of values for water quality parameters reflecting optimal corrosion control during three consecutive years of annual monitoring. Water systems may accelerate to triennial monitoring for water quality parameters at the tap if they have maintained 90th percentile lead levels less than or equal to 0.005 mg/L, 90th percentile copper levels less than or equal to 0.65 mg/L, and the range of water quality parameters designated by the Division under subsection 10.3.6 as representing optimal corrosion control during two consecutive six-month monitoring periods.
16 Del. Admin. Code § 4462-10.0
20 DE Reg. 808(4/1/2017)
24 DE Reg. 794(2/1/2021) (Final)
24 DE Reg. 904( 4/1/2021) (Errata)