(NOTE- Since the subagreement is subject to reduction under this clause by reason of defective cost or pricing data submitted in connection with certain subcontractors, the engineer may wish to include a clause in each such subcontract requiring the subcontractor to appropriately indemnify the engineer. It is also expected that any subcontractor subject to such indemnification will generally require substantially similar indemnification for defective cost or pricing data required to be submitted by lower tier subcontractors.)
NOTE- This subdivision is applicable to any contract negotiated between the municipality and its contractor in excess of $500,000; negotiated change orders in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent of the contract, whichever is less, affecting the price of a formally advertised, competitively awarded, fixed price contract; or any lower tier subcontract or purchase order in excess of $500,000 or 10 percent of the assistance agreement, whichever is less, under a contract other than a formally advertised, competitively awarded, fixed price subagreement. This subdivision is not applicable for contracts to the extent that they are awarded on the basis of effective price competition.
The contractor and subcontractor, where appropriate, warrant that cost and pricing data submitted for evaluation with respect to negotiation of prices for negotiated contracts, lower tier subcontracts and change orders is based on current, accurate, and complete data supported by their books and records. If the municipality or the Commissioner determines that any price (including profit) negotiated in connection with this contract, any lower tier subcontract, or any amendment thereunder was increased by any significant sums because the data provided was incomplete, inaccurate, or not current at the time of submission, then such price, cost, or profit shall be reduced accordingly, and the contract shall be modified in writing to reflect such reduction. Failure to agree on a reduction shall be subject to subdivision (8) of this subsection.
NOTE- Since the contract is subject to reduction under this subdivision by reason of defective cost or pricing data submitted in connection with lower tier subcontracts, the contractor may wish to include a clause in each lower tier subcontract requiring the lower tier subcontractor to appropriately indemnify the contractor. It is also expected that any lower tier subcontractor subject to such indemnification will generally require substantially similar indemnification for defective cost or pricing data required to be submitted by lower tier subcontractors.
The contract must clearly establish a price ceiling which may not be exceeded without formally amending the contract.
Any contract awarded under this request for qualifications or professional proposals is expected to be funded in part by the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection. This procurement will be subject to requirements contained in subsections (h), (i) and (o) of this section. The State of Connecticut will not be a party to this request for qualifications or professional proposals or any resulting contract.
Any contract or contracts awarded under this invitation for bids are expected to be funded in part by the State of Connecticut, Department of Environmental Protection. Neither the State of Connecticut nor any of its departments, agencies or employees is or will be a party to this invitation for bids or any resulting contract. This procurement will be subject to the requirements contained in subsections (h), (j) and (o) of this section;
The municipality shall adopt the sewer use ordinance and implement the user charge system developed under subsections (e) and (f) of 22a-482-3 and approved by the Commissioner before the pollution abatement facilities are placed in operation. Further, the municipality shall implement the user charge system and sewer use ordinance for the useful life of the pollution abatement facilities.
The municipality shall comply with the applicable requirements of section 22a-482-3(d) for value engineering.
The Commissioner may annul the funding agreement if he or she determines that there has been no substantial performance of the project work without good cause, there is convincing evidence the funding assistance was obtained by fraud, or there is convincing evidence of gross abuse or corrupt practices in the administration of the project. In addition to such remedies as may be available to the state under state or local law, all funds previously paid to the municipality shall be returned or credited to the state and no further payments shall be made to the municipality.
Conn. Agencies Regs. § 22a-482-4