Statutes, codes, and regulations
Colorado Administrative Code
Department 2500 - Department of Human ServicesDivision 2509 - Social Services Rules (Volume 7; Child Welfare, Child Care Facilities)
Rule 12 CCR 2509-2 - REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT
Section 12 CCR 2509-2-7.112 - STATE FAIR HEARING BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS

12 Colo. Code Regs. § 2509-2-7.112

Download
PDF
Current through Register Vol. 47, No. 11, June 10, 2024
Section 12 CCR 2509-2-7.112 - STATE FAIR HEARING BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
A. When the Office of Administrative Courts receives the appeal documents from the State Department, the Office of Administrative Courts shall docket the appeal and enter a procedural order to the parties indicating the following:
1. The date and time for a telephone scheduling conference with the parties.
2. During the telephone scheduling conference, the Office of Administrative Courts shall determine the date for the hearing. Following the scheduling conference, the Office of Administrative Courts will issue a further procedural order and notice of hearing. The order/notice will contain the hearing date, the fourteen (14) day deadline for the notice of issues, the fourteen (14) day deadline for response and deadline for filing pre-hearing statements. Any party requiring an extension or modification of any of the deadlines in the order may file a request with the Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Administrative Courts shall also issue a protective order which will protect and govern the handling of all pleadings, discovery, and evidence. The order must be signed by an Administrative Law Judge and must state that:
a. Any documents exchanged by the parties containing confidential information, including, but not limited to pleadings, Trails reports and investigative records, medical records, law enforcement investigation records, and documents regarding child victims will be used for the sole purpose of proceeding with this appeal.
b. The parties may disclose confidential information to their attorneys or any expert witness only as necessary for the prosecution or defense of the appeal. The appellant is not authorized to disclose or use confidential information for any other purpose.
c. The parties may exchange discovery containing information that is confidential under department rule 12 CCR 2509-2, § 7.111.
d. To the extent that the parties may disclose confidential records to expert witnesses, the parties shall provide a copy of the protective order to the expert witnesses and advise the expert witness of his or her obligation not to disclose the records or information learned from the confidential records.
e. The exchange and use of the confidential information or records does not waive the right of either party to object to the admission of the documents into evidence on any grounds.
f. If the parties use or offer confidential information or records as evidence during the course of the hearing, counsel and the parties shall take reasonable measures to protect such information or records from public disclosure including but not limited to filing records under seal.
g. The appellant must destroy or return to the department all protected health and abuse and neglect information (including all copies made) at the end of the appeal or, should the appellant choose to pursue any further administrative remedies, when those remedies have been exhausted.
h. The hearing regarding the factual basis for the child abuse and/or neglect finding shall be closed to the public.
i. This order does not prohibit the department from using documents or information as authorized, required, or permitted by law.
3. The notice of issues shall include the following:
a. The specific allegations(s) that form the basis of the county department's finding that the Appellant was responsible for child abuse or neglect;
b. The specific type and severity of child abuse asserted against Appellant and the legal authority supporting the finding; and,
c. To the extent that the State Department determines that the facts contained in the state automated case management system support a modification of the type or severity of child abuse or neglect determined by the county department, the State Department shall so notify the county department and the Appellant of that modification and the process shall proceed on the modified finding(s).
4. The Appellant shall respond to the State Department's submittal by providing the factual and legal basis supporting the appeal to the State Department and to the Office of Administrative Courts.
5. If the Appellant fails to participate in the scheduling conference referenced above or fails to submit the response referenced herein, the Office of Administrative Courts shall deem the appeal to have been abandoned by the Appellant and render an Initial Decision Dismissing Appeal. In accordance with the procedures set forth below, the Office of Appeals may reinstate the appeal for good cause shown by the Appellant.
6. In the event that either party fails to respond to a motion to dismiss filed in the appeal, the Administrative Law Judge shall not consider the motion to be confessed and shall render a decision based on the merits of the motion.
B. The Administrative Law Judge shall conduct the appeal in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, Section 24-4-105, C.R.S. The rights of the parties include:
1. The State Department shall have the burden of proof to establish the facts by a preponderance of the evidence and that the facts support the conclusion that the Appellant is responsible for the child abuse or neglect indicated in the notice of issues provided by the State Department. The state automated case management system is not the only acceptable evidence for establishing that the finding is supported by a preponderance of evidence;
2. Each party shall have the right to present his or her case or defense by oral and documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct cross-examination;
3. Subject to these rights and requirements, where a hearing will be expedited and the interests of the parties will not be subsequently prejudiced thereby, the Administrative Law Judge may receive all or part of the evidence in written form or by oral stipulations;
4. A telephonic hearing may be conducted as an alternative to a face-to-face hearing unless either party requests a face-to-face hearing in writing. The written request for a face-to-face hearing must be filed with the Office of Administrative Courts and the other party at least ten (10) calendar days before the scheduled hearing. A request for a face-to-face hearing may necessitate the re-setting of the hearing; and,
5. Where facilities exist that have videoconferencing technology local to the county department that made the founded finding, either party may request that the hearing be conducted via that technology. The requesting party shall investigate the feasibility of this approach and shall submit a written request outlining the arrangements that could be made for video conference. The Office of Administrative Courts shall hold the hearing via videoconferencing for the convenience of the parties whenever requested and feasible. A request for a hearing via videoconferencing may necessitate the re-setting of the hearing.
C. At the conclusion of the hearing, unless the Administrative Law Judge allows additional time to submit documentation, the Administrative Law Judge shall take the matter under advisement. After considering all the relevant evidence presented by the parties, the Administrative Law Judge shall render an Initial Decision for review by the Colorado Department of Human Services, Office of Appeals.
D. The Initial Decision shall uphold, modify or overturn/reverse the county finding. The Administrative Law Judge shall have the authority to modify the type and severity level of the child abuse or neglect finding to meet the evidence provided at the hearing. The Administrative Law Judge shall not order the county to modify its record; rather, the State Department shall indicate the outcome of the appeal in its portion of the state automated case management system.
E. When an Appellant fails to appear at a duly scheduled hearing having been given proper notice, without having given timely advance notice to the Office of Administrative Courts of acceptable good cause for inability to appear at the hearing at the time, date and place specified in the notice of hearing, then the appeal shall be considered abandoned and the Administrative Law Judge shall enter an Initial Decision Dismissing Appeal. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 7.114, the Office of Appeals may reinstate the appeal for good cause shown by the Appellant.

12 CCR 2509-2-7.112

38 CR 19, October 10, 2015, effective 11/1/2015
39 CR 17, September 10, 2016, effective 10/1/2016
39 CR 19, October 10, 2016, effective 11/1/2016
40 CR 11, June 10, 2017, effective 7/1/2017
40 CR 13, July 10, 2017, effective 8/1/2017
41 CR 01, January 10, 2018, effective 2/1/2018
41 CR 03, February 10, 2018, effective 3/2/2018
41 CR 15, August 10, 2018, effective 9/1/2018
42 CR 03, February 10, 2019, effective 3/15/2019
43 CR 09, May 10, 2020, effective 6/1/2020
44 CR 01, January 10, 2021, effective 1/30/2021
44 CR 13, July 10, 2021, effective 7/30/2021
44 CR 21, November 10, 2021, effective 11/30/2021
44 CR 23, December 10, 2021, effective 12/30/2021
45 CR 01, January 10, 2022, effective 1/30/2022
45 CR 05, March 10, 2022, effective 3/30/2022
45 CR 11, June 10, 2022, effective 6/30/2022
46 CR 03, February 10, 2022, effective 3/2/2023
46 CR 09, May 10, 2023, effective 6/1/2023
46 CR 11, June 10, 2023, effective 7/1/2023