Local offices are also encouraged to enter into prosecution agreements with their district court. Agreements should include information on how, and under what circumstances, cases will be accepted for possible prosecution and any other criteria set by the court for accepting cases for prosecution, such as a minimum amount of over-issuance that resulted from the intentional program violation.
Local offices shall enter into the automated system individuals disqualified for intentional program violation/fraud prior to the second (2nd) to the last working day of the month. In addition, local offices shall prepare quarterly a form FS-36A, Investigation/Intentional Program Violation/Fraud Report. The completed report shall be due fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the quarter to the State Department.
"Intentionally" means a false representation of a material fact with knowledge of that falsity, or omission of a material fact with knowledge of that omission.
If an IPV/fraud is determined through an ADH, the individual must be notified in writing once it is determined that they are to be disqualified. The disqualification period shall begin no later than the second month which follows the date the individual receives written notice of the disqualification. ***
If an IPV/fraud is determined through the client signing a waiver of an administrative disqualification hearing form, then the period of disqualification shall begin with the first month which follows the date the household member receives written notification of the disqualification.
If an individual is determined through a court to be disqualified for an IPV/fraud, but the date for initiating the disqualification period is not specified, the local office shall initiate the disqualification period for currently eligible individuals within forty-five (45) calendar days of the date the disqualification was ordered. Any other court-imposed disqualification shall begin within forty-five (45) calendar days of the date the court found a currently eligible individual guilty of civil or criminal misrepresentation or fraud.
Unless contrary to the court order, the period of disqualification shall begin within forty-five (45) calendar days from the date the household member signed the disqualification consent agreement. However, if the court imposes a disqualification period or specifies the date for initiating the disqualification period, the state department shall disqualify the household member in accordance with the court order.
Individuals who have waived a hearing for IPV or who have been found to have committed an IPV through a local-level or state administrative IPV decision shall be ineligible to participate in SNAP for twelve (12) months for the first (1st) IPV; twenty-four (24) months for the second (2nd) IPV; and permanently for the third (3rd) IPV/fraud.
Individuals who misrepresent their identity or residency to receive duplicate benefits shall be ineligible to participate in SNAP for a period of ten (10) years. Receiving duplicate benefits is considered an attempt to receive or the receipt of more than one original allotment of benefits during a calendar month. A permanent disqualification for a third (3rd) offense would override the disqualification period for duplicate benefits.
An individual shall not be ineligible due to a drug conviction unless misuse of SNAP benefits is part of the court findings. An individual found guilty of purchasing controlled substances, as defined in Section 18-18-102(5), C.R.S., with SNAP benefits will be disqualified for twenty-four (24) months on the first (1st) conviction by a court of law and permanently disqualified on a second (2nd) conviction by a court of law. The disqualification periods shall also apply to individuals with a felony conviction entered on or after July 1, 1997, for possession, use, or distribution of controlled substances only if the conviction is directly related to the misuse of SNAP benefits.
The local office may conduct a local-level administrative disqualification hearing for intentional Program violation or may use the Office of Administrative Courts of the Colorado Department of Personnel and Administration to conduct a state-level administrative disqualification hearing. The local office may also initiate court action by referring an intentional program violation under state fraud statutes to a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
The state-level hearing may be conducted by telephone using conference call techniques unless one of the parties objects to this method. If a hearing is held by telephone, the rules of procedure, including recording of the hearing, shall be the same as a face-to-face hearing. The household member charged with intentional program violation has the right to request a face-to-face hearing at any time, including up to and during the telephonic hearing, but not once the telephonic hearing is concluded.
A pending state or local-level administrative disqualification hearing shall not affect the individual's or the household's right to be certified and to participate in the program. Since the local office cannot disqualify a household member for intentional program violation until it obtains a signed waiver of administrative hearing or until the local hearing official or State Department finds that the individual has committed intentional program violation, the local office shall determine eligibility and benefit level of the household in the same manner it would be determined for any other household.
In the case of a hearing before the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), this determination shall be an initial decision to be reviewed by the Office of Appeals. The initial decision shall not be implemented pending review by the Office of Appeals and entry of a final agency decision. The initial decision shall advise the household that failure to file exceptions to provisions of the initial decision will waive the right to seek judicial review of a final agency decision affirming those provisions.
If the appellant does not submit a letter seeking to show good cause within the ten (10) calendar day period, the order of dismissal shall be filed with the Office of Appeals of the State Department. The Office of Appeals shall confirm the dismissal of the appeal by an agency decision, which shall be served on the parties and the interested Division of the State Department. Within three (3) working days after the effective date of the decision, the local office shall implement necessary actions to provide benefits in the correct amount, to terminate benefits, to recover benefits incorrectly paid, and/or other appropriate actions in accordance with the rules. If the appellant submits a letter seeking to show good cause and the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) finds that the stated facts do not constitute good cause, the ALJ shall enter an initial decision confirming the dismissal. The appellant may file exceptions to the initial decision pursuant to Section 4.802.63, D.
Once the local-level hearing decision or a final state-level decision has been made, written notice, prior to disqualification, will be provided to the household member, to the local office, and to the state department containing:
10 CCR 2506-1-4.803