5 Colo. Code Regs. § 1002-38.69

Current through Register Vol. 47, No. 20, October 25, 2024
Section 5 CCR 1002-38.69 - STATEMENT OF BASIS, SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE: NOVEMBER 10, 2008 RULEMAKING FOR UPPER SOUTH PLATTE SEGMENT 6b; EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2009

The provisions of C.R S. 25-8-202(1)(a), (b) and (2); 25-8-203; 25-8-204; and 25-8-402; provide the specific statutory authority for adoption of these regulatory amendments. The Commission also adopted in compliance with 24-4-103(4) C.R.S. the following statement of basis and purpose.

BASIS AND PURPOSE

The Commission revised the site-specific phosphorus standard and changed the chlorophyll goal to a standard for Chatfield Reservoir (Upper South Platte segment 6b) and revised the Chatfield Reservoir Control Regulation (Regulation No 73) to be consistent with these revised standards.

Current Review: The Commission directed the Division to undertake a technical review of the scientific basis for the Chatfield Reservoir phosphorus standard for the following reasons:

A. The phosphorus standard has been exceeded several times in the last decade, while the associated chlorophyll goal has not. The incongruity suggests that the original basis for linking chlorophyll and phosphorus concentrations in the lake should be revisited.
B. The protocol for computing the average phosphorus concentration, which determines attainment of the phosphorus standard, needs to be clarified. The evolution of sampling protocols for Chatfield Reservoir may have inadvertently created a bias in the average phosphorus concentration, with the potential to make it inconsistent with the original intent of the standard.
C. A review commissioned by the Basin Authority in 2005 identified concerns about the TMAL and the underlying assumptions. Based in part on this review, the Commission directed the Division and the Authority "to examine the TMAL and its underlying assumptions."

The technical review showed:

A.Current Condition: Chatfield Reservoir presently has good water quality and uses are being attained. The Commission believes that good conditions have been maintained by having implemented effective phosphorus control strategies through adoption of Control Regulation No. 73. The data record amassed through more than 20 years of water quality monitoring shows that trophic condition has remained stable, and it provides a comprehensive basis for assessing the variability in those characteristics (chlorophyll and phosphorus) of trophic condition that are recommended as standards.
B.Characterizing Chlorophyll: Typical summer average chlorophyll is about 6 µg/l, and there has been no trend for increasing concentration over the 26-year period of study. Concentrations vary from year to year, but have exceeded 10 µg/l only 5 times in 24 years, and only twice since 1990.
C.Role of Phosphorus: The Commission believes that eutrophication of Chatfield Reservoir has been averted through the control of phosphorus loads from the watershed. Adoption of the control regulation made this possible by imposing concentration limits on point source discharges and by facilitating implementation of nonpoint source management. There has been no trend for increasing phosphorus in Plum Creek, where most of the development has occurred. Domestic dischargers are to be commended for their role in making this effort a success.
D.Characterizing Phosphorus: Typical summertime concentrations of phosphorus have been about 0.020 mg/L, and there has been no trend for increasing phosphorus in the lake. Summer median concentrations have exceeded 0.030 mg/L in only 3 of 24 years. It is appropriate to maintain phosphorus as a standard, rather than a goal, because of its importance in characterizing trophic condition, and because it is the direct link to the control regulation.
E.Old Relationship Between Chlorophyll and Phosphorus: The existing phosphorus standard is not consistent with the existing chlorophyll goal. Phosphorus concentrations at or below the level of the standard have yielded chlorophyll much lower than the goal. The mismatch is the result of relying entirely on one year of data and assuming that all variation in chlorophyll is explained completely by the phosphorus concentration in the reservoir.
F.Defining a New Chlorophyll-Phosphorus Linkage: The conventional regression approach used in the Clean Lakes Study to link chlorophyll and phosphorus in the context of trophic condition has shown its weaknesses. The Division believes a better linkage is based on the simple ratio of chlorophyll to phosphorus, which records the net responsiveness of the resident algal community to the amount of phosphorus present in the lake. It is a "net" value because it reflects the balance of growth (nutrients, light, temperature) and loss (grazing, washout, settling) processes. The measured ratios offer an empirical basis for defining expectations for chlorophyll given the available phosphorus.
G.Allowable Frequency of Exceedance: The original nutrient criteria (phosphorus standard and chlorophyll goal) did not specify the frequency with which exceedances would be allowed. There is no general precedent for nutrient criteria, which are assessed once a year on the basis of a seasonal average, but the Division believes that one exceedance is allowable in five years.
H.Sampling Requirements: A more complete definition of sampling protocols is needed to clarify the basis for assessing attainment of these site-specific standards in the future.

Revised Water Quality Standards for Chatfield Reservoir: With the benefit of the lengthy historical record now available, the Commission believes it is appropriate to set chlorophyll and phosphorus standards consistent with the trophic condition that has been maintained. The Commission adopted a chlorophyll standard of 10 µg/l and a phosphorus standard of 0.030 mg/L to preserve the intended trophic condition and protect uses. Each standard is to be attained in four of five years.

Because the phosphorus and chlorophyll standards are defined as seasonal averages, some additional guidance is required concerning timing and location of samples to be used in calculating the average. Samples are to be collected at a site near the dam and should be representative of conditions in the mixed layer. Past monitoring has resulted in 6 samples during the summer months (July, August, and September); it is anticipated that the same level of effort will be applied in the future. For assessment, the average (arithmetic mean) is calculated for the summer samples in each year.

Development of Assessment Thresholds: For Chatfield Reservoir, a distinction is made between the standard and an assessment threshold. The assessment threshold is designed to address the concern about the risk of incorrectly counting an exceedance when a high summer value is the result of natural variability, but does not indicate a substantive change in trophic condition. The approach is justified by the special nature of the pollutants (chlorophyll and phosphorus are not toxic) and the site-specific nature of the concern about false exceedances. Another reason for establishing an assessment threshold that is different than the standard is that the site-specific standard is derived from historical data, which creates the expectation that a number of exceedances will occur. Natural variability, especially for chlorophyll, is sufficient to produce much more uncertainty in the assessed value than in the standard, which was derived from the set of all summer averages. The Commission is establishing assessment thresholds for Chatfield Reservoir nutrient standards based on this unique combination of circumstances and does not intend this action to be a precedent for other standards and/or other segments. "Assessment thresholds" were developed by calculating the standard error of each summer average. A regression of the upper confidence limit on the average provides an equation that can be used to specify the upper confidence limit (90%) for any particular concentration (e.g., the standard). Assessment thresholds were added in section 38.6 ,(4) with a reference in the standards table "qualifier" column." The resulting assessment thresholds were chlorophyll = 11.2 µg/l, summer average, 1 in 5 year allowable exceedance frequency and phosphorus = 0.035 mg/l, summer average, 1 in 5 year allowable exceedance frequency.

At the same time that this change was adopted in Regulation No. 38, the Commission adopted changes in the Control Regulation for Chatfield Reservoir (Regulation No. 73) that are consistent with the revised standard.

PARTIES TO THE RULEMAKING

1. Chatfield Watershed Association
2. Plum Creek Wastewater Authority
3. Colorado Division of Wildlife
4. Roxborough Water and Sanitation District
5. Dominion Water and Sanitation District
6. U. S. EPA
7. Denver Regional Council of Governments

5 CCR 1002-38.69

38 CR 03, February 10, 2015, effective 6/30/2015
38 CR 17, September 10, 2015, effective 12/31/2015
39 CR 03, February 10, 2016, effective 3/1/2016
39 CR 03, February 10, 2016, effective 6/30/2016
39 CR 23, December 25, 2016, effective 12/30/2016
40 CR 03, February 10, 2017, effective 6/30/2017
40 CR 09, May 10, 2017, effective 6/30/2017
41 CR 01, January 10, 2018, effective 1/31/2018
41 CR 03, February 10, 2018, effective 6/30/2018
42 CR 04, February 25, 2019, effective 6/30/2019
43 CR 03, February 10, 2020, effective 6/30/2020
43 CR 17, September 10, 2020, effective 12/31/2020
44 CR 01, January 10, 2021, effective 2/14/2021
44 CR 05, March 10, 2021, effective 6/30/2021
44 CR 17, September 10, 2021, effective 12/31/2021
45 CR 17, September 10, 2022, effective 9/30/2022
45 CR 21, November 10, 2022, effective 11/30/2022
46 CR 10, May 25, 2023, effective 6/14/2023