The provisions of C.R.S. 25-8-202(1)(a), (b) and (2); 25-8-203; 25-8-204; and 25-8-402; provide the specific statutory authority for adoption of these regulatory amendments. The commission also adopted in compliance with 24-4-103(4) C.R.S. the following statement of basis and purpose.
BASIS AND PURPOSE:
Rio Grande segments 4a and 7 (CORGRG04a and CORGRG07): The commission continued the application of the current ambient quality-based site-specific standards (which are based on irreversibility) through December 31, 2028; delayed the effective dates of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 feasibility-based site-specific standards by five years; and replaced two Tier 1 feasibility-based site-specific standards on Segment 4a with the table value standards (TVS). The site-specific standards, assessment locations, and effective dates are included in Section 36.6(4)(b)-(c).
BACKGROUND
In the 2013 Temporary Modifications Hearing, the commission adopted the proposal of Rio Grande Silver, Inc. (RGS) to add two tiers of feasibility-based site-specific standards to segments 4a and 7 based on the feasibility of reversing historical sources of metals. See Section 36.35. These tiered feasibility-based site-specific standards would have delayed-effective dates and were based on improvements in water quality tied to future reopening of the Bulldog Mine. The Tier 1 standards represented predicted improvements in water quality in the Rio Grande and Willow Creek mainstem due to discharge of treated water from the Bulldog Mine during dewatering of the lower mine pool, and once effective the Tier 1 standards would be in place for two years. The Tier 2 standards reflected further water quality improvements predicted by a 90% reduction in flow and metals load from the Nelson Tunnel, after RGS had drawn down water levels in the Bulldog Mine to support operations, and would be pumping at a lower rate.
In the 2018 Rio Grande Basin Hearing, the commission replaced temporary modifications for multiple metals on segments 4a and 7 with interim ambient-quality based site-specific standards (based on irreversibility), which were to apply until the effective dates of the feasibility-based site-specific standards. See Section 36.42(K). Existing water quality did not attain TVS for several metals, but represented the highest attainable condition for the near future because no improvement is feasible in the absence of Nelson Tunnel remediation or the potential restart of the Bulldog Mine. Therefore, interim ambient-quality based site-specific standards were calculated using water quality data from 2012-2017. The commission also updated the Tier 1 and Tier 2 feasibility-based site-specific standards that are based on improvements in water quality contingent on the reopening of the Bulldog Mine, dewatering of the lower mine workings, and construction of a water treatment plant to treat this water.
REVISIONS TO SITE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS
In this 2023 Hearing, the commission adopted the proposal of RGS to:
Segment 4a for chronic cadmium and chronic manganese during low flow conditions. The commission replaced the Segment 4a Tier 1 low flow chronic cadmium feasibility-based site-specific standard with the TVS, which the commission revised statewide in 2019 based on updated scientific information about the protection of aquatic life. See Regulation 31, Section 31.57. The commission replaced the Segment 4a Tier 1 low flow chronic manganese feasibility-based site-specific standard with the Water Supply (WS) standard based on the treatability study demonstrating this standard was feasible to meet. No other changes were made to the tiered feasibility-based site-specific standards.
RGS' proposal was supported by a longevity plan, updated treatability review, manganese treatability study, and data collected from assessment locations by the division, RGS, and local non-profit organizations.
The commission will reevaluate the basis of and information used to develop these standards in or before 2028, before the Tier 1 feasibility-based site-specific standards go into effect January 1, 2029. The commission will not reevaluate these standards during the June 2024 Regulation No. 36 rulemaking hearing.
In April 2013 (36.33) and subsequent rulemaking hearings (36.39 and 36.42), the commission has adopted and extended temporary modifications for arsenic of "As(ch)=hybrid" (expiration date of 12/31/24) on many segments with the 0.02 µg/L Water + Fish numeric arsenic standard. The arsenic temporary modification recognizes existing and predicted compliance issues, instream nonattainment, and the uncertainty regarding the water quality standard necessary to protect current and/or future uses and the extent to which ambient concentrations of arsenic are natural or irreversible (31.7(3)). The division submitted a plan to resolve uncertainty in the 2019 Temporary Modifications rulemaking (36.44).
The division plans to propose revised standards for arsenic as soon as possible following updated toxicological information from EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) and completion of ongoing studies to better understand arsenic conditions in Colorado. Furthermore, per the conditions of the revised and extended temporary modification at 36.6(2)(c) (effective 6/30/2020 and expires 12/31/2024), and based on the widespread need to make progress to understand sources of arsenic and set forth processes for lowering arsenic in discharges, additional permit Terms and Conditions (T&Cs) are being implemented for facilities benefitting from the "current condition" temporary modification. These T&Cs may include requirements for additional monitoring, source identification, and characterization of source control and treatment options for reducing arsenic concentrations in effluent. The commission recognizes the need to resolve the uncertainty in the arsenic standards and ensure that human health is adequately protected.
The commission identified segments where an arsenic temporary modification had previously been inadvertently omitted. The commission adopted arsenic temporary modifications on the following segments:
Alamosa River/La Jara Creek/Conejos River: 12 (CORGAL12)
Closed Basin-San Luis Valley River Basin: 13 (CORGCB13)
To remain consistent with the commission's decisions regarding arsenic in section 36.33, all existing temporary modifications for arsenic of "As(ch)=hybrid" (expiration date of 12/31/24), with the exception of those listed below, were retained.
Where evidence indicated the requirements to qualify for a temporary modification were not met, temporary modifications were deleted. The commission deleted chronic arsenic temporary modifications (expiring 12/31/2024) on several segments due to a lack of evidence of a demonstrated or predicted water quality-based effluent limit compliance problem for these segments. These segments have all been designated as Outstanding Waters, have no CDPS permitted dischargers with WQBELs for arsenic, and are without dischargers on upstream segments who may receive WQBELs based on protection of downstream uses. Temporary modifications for arsenic were deleted from the following segments:
Rio Grande: 1 (CORGRG01)
5 CCR 1002-36.50