5 Colo. Code Regs. § 1003-2-100.30
The provisions of sections 25-9-104(1)(a), (3), (4), (5) and (6), C.R.S.; 25-9-106; 25-9-106.2; 25-9-106.3; 25-9-107; 25-9-108, C.R.S., provide the specific statutory authority for the adoption of these regulatory provisions. The Board also adopted, in compliance with section 24-4-103(4), C.R.S., the following statement of basis and purpose.
BASIS AND PURPOSE
Background and Overview
The 2000 Colorado General Assembly adopted HB 00-1431, revising the certification procedures and requirements for operators of water and wastewater facilities, which include water treatment facilities, domestic and industrial wastewater treatment facilities, water distribution systems and wastewater collection systems. The bill established the composition, duties and rulemaking authority of the Water and Wastewater Facility Operators Certification Board (formerly the Plant Operators Certification Board).
The Board intends that the rules adopted pursuant to HB 00-1431 will comply with guidelines established by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under section 1419(a) of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, which specifies minimum standards for certification and recertification of operators of community and nontransient noncommunity public water systems. In particular, the Board anticipates that this regulation will satisfy EPA requirements and allow that agency to release to the state federal funding that is contingent on adoption of appropriate certification requirements.
Operator Classification and Qualification Issues
In this rulemaking, the Board established various classes of operators for water treatment facilities, domestic and industrial wastewater treatment facilities, water distribution systems and wastewater collection systems. Pursuant to HB 00-1431, the classes of operators established by the Board reflect the differing levels of complexity encountered in operating the various types of facilities and systems. This legislation also authorized the Board to establish separate certification classifications for operators of multiple facilities and for operators of certain small systems. Because of time constraints imposed by EPA deadlines, the Board has chosen to address the issue of operators of multiple facilities in a later rulemaking and has simply "reserved" this section at this time. The Board has made specific provisions for the certification of operators of Small Water and Wastewater Systems and for Transient Non-community Water Systems, as discussed below.
The Board also defined a process for determining the qualifications for certifying and renewing the certification of operators in each of the various classes. In accordance with HB 00-1431 and EPA guidelines, the Board adopted minimum education and experience requirements for operators, a requirement that examinations be validated, and a requirement that operators meet ongoing training requirements in order to renew their certification. The Board intends that if an operator wishes to renew multiple certifications, the same training units may be applied to meet the requirements of more than one certification renewal if the courses in question have been accredited for each of the certifications in question. Operators with multiple certifications are encouraged to take training courses specific to each of their certifications.
The Board also chose appropriate levels at which an applicant may substitute experience for education, or education for experience, in order to allow operator certification where a combination of these components demonstrates that the operator is competent to operate a particular class of facility. Although either education or cross-experience may be substituted for a portion of the experience requirement for any classification, the Board intends that no less than 50 percent of any experience requirement must be met by actual on-site operating experience in the classification applied for. A provision providing for transitional renewal training requirements for operators whose certificates expire prior to January 30, 2004 is also included.
Minimum Experience for Entry Level Operators
According to EPA regulations, operators seeking to be certified must have a specified amount of minimum experience. Several stakeholders expressed concern that requiring a minimum amount of experience for all operators placed an undue burden on entry-level operators in rural areas of Colorado because they would not have the time or financial capability to meet such a certification requirement. In response to these concerns, the Board created a new level of certification for operators of water treatment facilities and water distribution systems serving Transient Non-community Water Systems that draw water from ground water sources not under the influence of surface water, serve less than 100 persons per day, and utilize only non-gaseous chlorine disinfection. Recognizing that such transient non-community systems are outside the scope of EPA guidelines, the Board chose not to impose a minimum experience requirement on such operators and allowed them to gain certification based solely on the passage of a written examination that focuses on subjects particularly relevant to operating this category of transient non-community water treatment facilities and transient non-community water distribution systems. For other entry level water and wastewater facility operators (Class D and Class 1), the Board has established a one-month minimum experience requirement. In order to provide flexibility to entry-level operators, the Board has established a number of options for meeting this experience requirement, including on-the-job training, apprenticeship, and on-site or correspondence training courses.
The Board also created a Small System classification for both water and wastewater facilities. These classifications apply to facilities that serve under 3300 persons and that otherwise fall into the Class D treatment and Class 1 distribution or collection classifications. Small water system operators shall be certified by taking a single examination in water treatment and distribution. Small wastewater system operators shall be certified by taking a single examination in wastewater collection and treatment. Renewal training requirements for these certificates have been set at 1.8 training units. During the transition period prior to the construction and validation of these examinations, applicants for these certifications will take both the Class D and Class 1 examinations in the appropriate category. The application and fee structures have been adjusted to reflect the degree of overlap among these requirements.
Classification of Water and Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Generally, the Board, chose to establish a system for classification of the State's water and wastewater treatment facilities according to their prior system of classification. Accordingly, the Board adopted a classification scheme which takes into consideration factors such as the size, complexity, and amount of water processed through the facility. The Board determined that it would be most efficient for the Division to retain the authority to classify facilities and modify the classification of any facility. Classification decisions by the Division can be appealed to the Board.
The Board recognizes that water treatment processes that do not utilize chemicals are more problematic and impose a greater risk on public health. Therefore, the Board requires that a higher class of distribution system be used in combination with treatment facilities that utilize ground water with a waiver of disinfection, including ultraviolet and ozone disinfection. This is due to the fact that there is no residual disinfectant in the distribution system.
Classification of Water Distribution and Wastewater Collection Systems
In classifying water distribution systems and wastewater collection systems the Board chose to initially classify the systems based on population, which the Board believes serves as an adequate surrogate for complexity. Additionally, the Board provided that the Division can change the classification of any particular facility based on complexity factors. The Board intends to revisit their initial classification scheme for water distribution and wastewater collection systems in a future rulemaking to consider adoption of a classification system that will more accurately reflect the complexities and differences between the various types of distribution and collection systems.
Fees
The new state legislation authorized the Board to adopt application and program fees which reflect the actual costs of administering the operator certification program. The Board has established a certification application fee of $15, as specified in the statute. It also established two types of program fees:
Status of Existing Operators
The Board chose to certify under these regulations those operators of water and wastewater treatment facilities who had been previously certified under the prior certification system. The Board also chose to certify under these regulations those operators of water distribution systems and wastewater collection systems who had been previously certified under the voluntary program administered by the Colorado Water and Wastewater Collection Systems Certification Council, based on the understanding that the voluntary certification program, and in particular the exam administered under the voluntary program, was adequate to ensure the protection of public health and the environment, and the safe operation of water distribution and wastewater collection systems.
In addition, the new regulation provides a procedure to authorize certain existing operators of existing water distribution and wastewater collection systems who have not obtained voluntary certification to continue operation of the specific systems where such operators are currently employed for a period of time without receiving a certificate. Pursuant to EPA guidelines the Board chose to allow operators of existing systems, who were authorized to make process control and/or system integrity decisions about water quality or quantity that may affect the public health or environment, to continue operation of their systems so long as certain requirements are met and a certain procedure is followed. This procedure allows owners of such systems to apply to the Board for an "Authorization for Continued Operation" for the existing operators of their system. Pursuant to EPA guidelines, the Board chose to make the "Authorization for Continued Operation" site-specific and non-transferable. To maintain this authorization, operators will need to meet the same on-going training requirements as certified operators. To move to another facility, operators would need to meet all initial certification requirements, including passing the appropriate exam. These same procedures apply to operators who hold existing restricted certificate issued under authority of the regulations being repealed in this rulemaking.
Operator Responsibilities
One section of the regulation adopted by the Board specifies the duties of certified operators and defines certain standards of performance for certified operators of affected facilities. The regulation requires certified operators to exercise reasonable care and judgment while performing their duties and in supervising facility operations. The regulation also requires operators to keep current with the Board information on where the operator(s) can be contacted so that the Board can notify the operator(s) of certification expiration, renewal requirements, and testing information.
Owner Responsibilities
Another section of the regulation adopted by the Board specifies the duties of owners of water and wastewater facilities. Pursuant to the legislation and EPA guidelines, the Board chose to require owners to place the direct supervision of their facilities under the control of an "operator in responsible charge" holding a valid certification equal to or greater than the classification of the facility. The Board clarified that a direct supervisor relationship exists if the operator in responsible charge has supervisory responsibility and authority with respect to other operators. The Board does not intend for direct supervision to mean that the operator in responsible charge must be on-site at all times.
In order to meet EPA guidelines, the Board required that all process control and/or system integrity decisions about water quality or quantity that may affect the public health or the environment be made by either an operator in responsible charge or another certified operator. This operator must be certified at a level equal to or higher than that of the facility. The Board also required owners to designate a certified operator who would be available for each operating shift. The Board clarified that in order for an operator to be "available," he or she must be on-site or able to be contacted as needed to initiate appropriate actions in a timely manner.
Finally, the regulation requires owners to submit to the Board information on the operator(s) in responsible charge of their facility so that the Board and Division can more efficiently enforce the provisions of this regulation and better protect the public health.
Division Enforcement Procedures
HB 00-1431 also set out the roles of the Water Quality Control Division and the Board in enforcing the new operator certification program. The Board recognized the role of the Division as the agency primarily responsible for investigating and reporting to the Board any misconduct by water and wastewater facility operators. Any disciplinary action regarding operators would be taken by the Board, after an opportunity for a hearing. Pursuant to the legislation, the Board also chose to allow owners of water and wastewater facilities to seek a hearing before the Board in response to a Division finding of a violation of the regulations or in response to a Department assessment of a civil penalty. The rule also establishes a process by which any person, affected or aggrieved by a decision of Division or a third party contractor implementing certain aspect of the program may seek relief through an appeal or hearing before the Board.
Nonprofit Contractors Issues
HB 00-1431 authorized the Board to appoint one or more independent nonprofit corporations to administer the operator certification program, including providing examinations, issuing certification documents, evaluating continuing training requirements for renewal of certification, and evaluating requests for reciprocity. The Board specified in the new regulation the program administration duties that it may choose to delegate to a nonprofit corporation.
5 CCR 1003-2-100.30