Section 52.06 - Health Insurance Review Panel Review Process(1) At any time before the panel has made decisions in accordance with 801 CMR 52.06, the parties may agree in writing, with copies to the panel and the Secretary, to terminate or suspend the review process for a stated period of time because they have reached an agreement, would like additional time to negotiate an agreement under 801 CMR 52.04, have mutually decided to return to collective bargaining pursuant to M.G.L. c. 150E or have mutually decided to resume negotiations under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 19.(2) If both parties have not mutually agreed to terminate the review process, within two business days after receipt of notice of submission to the panel, the impartial member of the review panel shall fix a time, date, and place for the panel to convene and shall give notice to the parties.(3)Meetings of the Panel Shall be Conducted Under the Open Meeting Law. The impartial member shall serve as chair of the panel and shall arrange for suitable records to be kept. The impartial member shall ensure that each member receives advance notice of the time, place and agenda for each meeting. All decisions shall be by recorded vote.(4) The panel has ten days to complete its required task once the panel members receive the appropriate public authority's original proposal. When the panel convenes on the date and time set by the impartial panel member, the panel shall do the following: (a) Review the public authority's proposed changes.1. Within ten calendar days of receiving proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, §§ 22 or 23, the panel shall determine whether the proposed increased dollar amounts for co-payments, deductibles, and other cost-sharing plan design features for the non-Medicare plan under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22 exceed the dollar amounts of the plan design features for the same or most similar benefits offered by the commission for the non-Medicare plan under M.G.L. c. 32A, § 4 with the largest subscriber enrollment. If such increased amounts do not exceed the dollar amounts of the plan design features for the same or most similar benefits offered by the commission for the non-Medicare plan under M.G.L. c. 32A, § 4 with the largest subscriber enrollment, the panel shall approve the appropriate public authority's immediate implementation of the proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32b, § 22, subject to 801 CMR 52.07. Where the political subdivision is not proposing a tiered provider network, the determination shall be made by comparing the savings that would result if the dollar amounts of the co-pays, deductibles and other cost-sharing plan design features in the political subdivision's plan equaled the dollar amounts of the co-pays, deductibles and other cost-sharing plan design features under tier 2 of the commission's most-subscribed plan. Where the political subdivision currently is proposing a tiered provider network that is tiered differently from the tiering in the commission's most-subscribed plan, the determination shall be made by assuming the co-pays, deductibles and cost-sharing plan design features in each tier of the political subdivision's plan are equal to those in the same tier of the commission's most-subscribed plan, beginning with a comparison of the highest tier. If the political subdivision's plan has fewer tiers than the commission's plan, the political subdivision's highest tier shall be compared to the commission's tier 3, and the second highest tier to the commission's tier 3.2. Within ten calendar days of receiving proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, §§ 22 or 23, the panel shall determine whether the proposed increased dollar amounts for co-payments and deductibles proposed for a Medicare-extension plan under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22 exceed the dollar amounts of the plan design features for the same or most similar benefits offered by the commission for the Medicare-extension plan under M.G.L. c. 32A, §§ 10C and 14 with the largest subscriber enrollment. If such increased amounts do not exceed the dollar amounts of the plan design features for the same or most similar benefits offered by the commission for the Medicare-extension plan under M.G.L. c. 32A, § 4 with the largest subscriber enrollment, the panel shall approve the appropriate public authority's immediate implementation of the proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22, subject to 801 CMR 52.07.3. Where the political subdivision is not proposing a tiered provider network, the determination shall be made by comparing the savings that would result if the dollar amounts of the co-pays, deductibles and other cost-sharing plan design features in the political subdivision's plan equaled the dollar amounts of the co-pays, deductibles and other cost-sharing plan design features under tier 2 of the commission's most-subscribed plan. Where the political subdivision currently is proposing a tiered provider network that is tiered differently from the tiering in the commission's most-subscribed plan, the determination shall be made by assuming the co-pays, deductibles and cost-sharing plan design features in each tier of the political subdivision's plan are equal to those in the same tier of the commission's most-subscribed plan, beginning with a comparison of the highest tier. If the political subdivision's plan has fewer tiers than the commission's plan, the political subdivision's highest tier shall be compared to the commission's tier 3, and the second highest tier to the commission's tier 2.4. If the panel does not approve implementation because the appropriate public authority's proposal fails to meet the criteria detailed in 801 CMR 52.06(4)(a)1. and 2., the appropriate public authority may submit a new proposal to the public employee committee and restart the process from that point pursuant to 801 CMR 52.03.(b) Review the public authority's estimated monetary savings due to proposed changes, after consulting the Commission's actuary:1. Within ten calendar days of receiving proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22 or 23, the panel shall confirm, the appropriate public authority's estimated monetary savings due to proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22 or 23.2. If the proposal is to transfer subscribers to the Commission, the panel shall determine if the anticipated savings by doing so would be at least five percent greater than the maximum possible savings amount that would be attained by plan design changes authorized under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22. If the panel confirms these savings, the panel shall approve the appropriate public authority's immediate implementation of the proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 23, subject to procedures adopted by the commission for transfer of subscribers.3. The appropriate public authority's estimate of savings due to the proposed changes shall be confirmed by the panel after consultation with the actuary selected by the Commission.4. If the panel finds that the savings estimate is unsubstantiated, it may require the public authority to provide additional information or submit a new savings estimate for the panel's review and confirmation. It may also require the public employee committee to submit a response to the new estimate.5. A certified copy of the vote confirming the savings estimate and, if the proposal is to transfer subscribers to the Commission, approval or rejection of the proposal, and explanation of the basis for any such change or disapproval shall be sent to the parties and the Secretary.(c) Review the public authority's mitigation proposal:1. Within ten calendar days of receiving proposed changes under M.G.L. c. 32B, § 22 or 23, the panel shall review the proposal to mitigate, moderate or cap the impact of these changes for subscribers, including retirees, low-income subscribers and subscribers with high out-of-pocket health care costs, who would otherwise be disproportionately affected.2. The municipal health insurance review panel may approve the mitigation proposal, or it may determine the proposal to be insufficient and may require additional savings to be shared with subscribers in the form of health reimbursement arrangements, wellness programs, health care trust funds for emergency medical care or inpatient hospital care, out-of-pocket caps, Medicare Part B reimbursements or reimbursements for other qualified medical expenses, as determined by the panel. Premium reductions for subscribers that result from the plan design changes shall not be credited against the total amount determined to be required to fund the mitigation proposal. Any health reimbursement arrangements created under a mitigation proposal shall be administered by the appropriate public authority and shall not be the responsibility of the Commission.3. In no case shall the municipal health insurance review panel designate more than 25% of the estimated savings to subscribers.4. All obligations on behalf of the appropriate public authority related to the mitigation proposal shall expire after the initial amount of estimated savings designated by the panel to be distributed to subscribers has been expended.5. In reaching a decision on the proposal under this subsection, the municipal health insurance review panel may consider:a. any alternative proposal from the public employee committee to mitigate, moderate or cap the impact of these changes for subscribers;b. discrepancies between the percentage contributed by retirees, surviving spouses and their dependent and the percentage contributed by other subscribers; andc. the impact of the changes on subscribers, including in particular the impact on retirees, low-income subscribers and subscribers with high out-of-pocket costs.6. The panel's decision shall incorporate any agreements made by the parties, and shall constitute the written agreement between the public employee committee and the appropriate public authority. The agreement shall be binding on all subscribers and their representatives.(d) Once the panel has taken the actions required under 801 CMR 52.06, the panel shall be considered dissolved.