Current through October 31, 2024
Section 148.215 - What if a port has plans for a deep draft channel and harbor?(a) If a State port will be directly connected by pipeline to a proposed deepwater port, and has existing plans for a deep draft channel and harbor, a representative of the port may request a determination under 33 U.S.C. 1503(d) .(b) The request must be sent, in writing, to the Commandant (CG-5P) within 30 days after the date that the notice of application for the deepwater port is published in the FEDERAL REGISTER.(c) The request must contain:(1) A signature of the highest official of the port submitting the request;(2) A copy of the existing plans for the construction of a deep draft channel and harbor;(3) Certification that the port has an active study by the Secretary of the Army for the construction of a deep draft channel and harbor, or that the port has an application pending for a permit under 33 U.S.C. 403 for the construction;(4) Any available documentation on:(i) Initial costs, by phases if development is staged, for the proposed onshore project, including dredging, ship terminal, and attendant facilities;(ii) Estimated annual operating expenses, by phases if development is staged, including labor, for 30 years for all elements of the project;(iii) Estimated completion time for all elements of the project;(iv) Estimated vessel traffic volume, and the volume and variety of the tonnage;(v) Potential traffic congestion conditions in the port, and the port's ability to control vessel traffic as a result of the proposed dredging project;(vi) Estimated economic benefits of the project, including: (A) Economic contribution to the local and regional area;(B) Induced industrial development;(C) Increased employment; and(D) Increases in tax revenues;(vii) Environmental and social impacts of the project on the local and regional community; and(viii) An estimate of the economic impact that the deepwater port license will have on the proposed project.(d) A statement whether the port seeks a determination that the port best serves the national interest.USCG-1998-3884, 71 FR 57651 , Sept. 29, 2006, as amended by USCG-2013-0397, 78 FR 39176 , July 1, 2013