Section 757.13 - Responsibility for MCRA actions(a)JAG designees.(1) Primary responsibility for investigating, asserting, and collecting Department of the Navy (DON) MCRA claims and properly forwarding MCRA claims to other Federal departments or agencies rests with the following personnel:(i) Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General (Claims and Tort Litigation Division) (Code 15); and the(ii) Commanding Officer, Naval Legal Service Command Europe and Southwest Asia (NLSC EURSWA), Naples, Italy, in its area of geographic responsibility.(2) JAG designee may assert and receive full payment on any MCRA claim. Code 15 may agree to compromise or waive claims for $100,000 or less. NLSC EURSWA may agree to compromise or waive claims for $40,000.00 or less. NLSC EURSWA claims in excess of $40,000.00 may be compromised or waived only with Code 15 approval. See Sec. 757.19 for further discussion of waiver and compromise.(b)Navy Medical Treatment Facility (MTF).(1) Naval MTFs are responsible for ensuring potential MCRA/ 10 U.S.C. 1095 claims are brought to the attention of the appropriate JAG designee.(2) The MTF reports all potential MCRA/ 10 U.S.C. 1095 cases by forwarding a copy of the daily injury log entries and admission records to the cognizant JAG designee within 7 days of treatment for which a third party may be liable. The JAG designee makes the determination of liability. Recovery for the costs of MTF care is based on Diagnostic Related Group rates or a Relative Value Unit. Rates are established by the Office of Management and Budget and/or the DoD, and published annually in the FEDERAL REGISTER.(c)TRICARE Fiscal Intermediary. The TRICARE fiscal intermediary is required to identify and promptly mail claims involving certain diagnostic codes to the cognizant JAG designee. Claims are asserted for the actual amount that TRICARE paid.(d)Department of Justice (DoJ). Only the DoJ may authorize compromise or waiver of an MCRA/ 10 U.S.C. 1095 claim in excess of $100,000.00 or settle an MCRA/ 10 U.S.C. 1095 claim in which the third party has filed a suit against the United States as a result of the incident which caused the injury and upon which the claim is based.72 FR 53428, Sept. 19, 2007