Although the aggregate amount on the appeals exceeds $5,000, since each tax year is treated separately for purposes of applying the total amount in dispute limitation under subdivision (a), and none of the individual tax years has a total amount in dispute that is $5,000 or more, the taxpayer may make the election for one or more of those appeals to be determined under the Small Case Program. If those three appeals have been consolidated, the taxpayer may still make an election to have the appeals determined under the Small Case Program for all three consolidated appeals as if those appeals were a single appeal.
Assuming the total amount in dispute for tax year 2019 is not reduced under the reduction rules in subdivision (b), the taxpayer would not be eligible to make the election to have the appeal for tax year 2019 determined under the Small Case Program.
First, the total amount on appeal for all years is $75,000. However, the amount in dispute for each calendar year (or fraction thereof) is treated separately for purposes of applying the $50,000 total amount in dispute limitation. Here, the total amount in dispute for the six-months (i.e., fraction) of calendar year 2017 at issue is $35,000, and the total amount in dispute for calendar year 2018 is $40,000. Neither of the individual calendar years (or fractions thereof) have a total amount in dispute that is $50,000 or more. This appeal does not exceed the total amount in dispute limitation.
Second, the income tax years covered by the audit are 2017 and 2018. The annual gross receipts are under the $20 million gross receipts limitation during each income tax year.
Therefore, the taxpayer may elect to participate in the Small Case Program.
Assuming the total amount in dispute is not reduced below $50,000 under the reduction rules in subdivision (b), the taxpayer would not be eligible to participate in the Small Case Program since the total amount in dispute for 2018 is $55,000, and this exceeds the $50,000 total amount in dispute per calendar year limitation.
First, the CDTFA liability period (January 1, 2017, though December 31, 2017) overlaps two federal income tax reporting periods: fiscal years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018. The taxpayer had less than $20 million in gross receipts for every federal income tax year falling within the audit period. This appeal does not exceed the gross receipts limitation.
Second, assuming the total amount in dispute is not reduced under the reduction rules in subdivision (b), the taxpayer would not be eligible to participate in the Small Case Program because the total amount in dispute for the four quarterly reporting periods in calendar year 2017 was $60,000, which exceeds the $50,000 threshold.
The taxpayer is not eligible to participate in the Small Case Program because the taxpayer had gross receipts for calendar year 2018 in the amount of $21,000,000, which exceeds the gross receipts limitation.
Assuming the taxpayer makes an election under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) to not request abatement or suspension of interest, then the $300 of interest is excluded from the total amount in dispute because the taxpayer did not separately request abatement or suspension of interest, and the total amount in dispute would be $4,950.
Since the taxpayer has not agreed to waive their right to separately request abatement or suspension of interest under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the total amount in dispute remains $5,250.
If the taxpayer does not separately dispute the late-filing penalty and does not separately request abatement or suspension of interest, the amount in dispute is the $4,900 of additional tax.
Further assume in its appeal that the taxpayer agrees to concede the $4,900 of additional tax and $600 of interest, but wishes to continue to separately request abatement of the $1,500 late-filing penalty. What is the total amount in dispute?
Because the taxpayer makes an election under paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b) to concede the tax and not separately request abatement or suspension of interest, the total amount in dispute is $1,500.
Although the taxpayer agrees to concede $1,500 in additional tax, the total amount in dispute is $5,500 since the taxpayer is still contesting the remaining $3,400 of additional tax, as well as waiver of the $1,500 late-filing penalty and abatement or suspension of the interest of $600.
Although the final Notice of Action denying the taxpayer's claim for refund was in the amount of $5,750, the total amount in dispute is $4,750 because FTB conceded $1,000 of the total claim amount in its opening brief filed with OTA.
Although the original Notice of Action was in the amount of $6,000, the total amount in dispute is $4,500 because FTB conceded $1,000 in additional tax, as well as reducing the late payment penalty by $350 and the interest by $150, or $1,500 total, in its opening brief filed with OTA.
Although an appeal with OTA may result in a finding the taxpayer is owed a refund that is under the total amount in dispute limitation, the taxpayer may not elect to have the appeal determined under the Small Case Program because a claim for refund of "$1 or more" is an appeal that is not eligible for the Small Case Program.
Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 18, § 30209.1
2. Amendment of section and NOTE filed 6-26-2023; operative 6-30-2023. This action is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act pursuant to Government Code section 15679(b). Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Government Code section 11343.8 (Register 2023, No. 26).
Note: Authority cited: Sections 15679 and 15679.5, Government Code. Reference: Section 15676.2, Government Code.
2. Amendment of section and Note filed 6-26-2023; operative 6/30/2023. This action is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act pursuant to Government Code section 15679(b). Submitted to OAL for filing and printing only pursuant to Government Code section 11343.8 (Register 2023, No. 26).