The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) signed into law by President Bush on February 8, 2006, contains provisions that impact eligibility for Medicaid long term care services. Implementation of the provisions will be effective 10-1-06. The following guidance provides a synopsis of the changes and gives procedures in implementing the changes.
To ensure consistency with the decisions of what constitutes a hardship, applications (LTC and HCBS Waiver) for an undue hardship waiver will be routed to OPPD, Medicaid Eligibility Unit, Slot S333.
Example #1: The initial application date is 10/30/06 and the transfer occurred 5-30-06. The penalty period will begin with the date of application 10-30-06 not the date of transfer. If the transfer occurred after the application date, then the penalty period will begin with the date of transfer.
NOTE: The application can still be approved for Medicaid if all eligibility requirements other than the transfer have been met. The individual will not be eligible for a vendor payment until the expiration of the penalty period but may receive other Medicaid services.
Example #2: At reevaluation on 9/1/07 the eligibility worker discovers a transfer occurred on 4/10/07 which resulted in ineligibility for LTC for 8 months. The penalty period will begin with 4/10/07 (the date of transfer). The eligibility worker will send a 10 day notice and apply the closure of the vendor payment effective with the day after the 10 day notice has expired and will continue with the balance of the penalty. Any payments made prior to the end of the notice will result in an overpayment.
Note: Even though the vendor payment has been closed, Medicaid will continue to cover services not covered under the vendor payment.
For Home and Community Based Waivers (HCBS), the imposition of a transfer of assets penalty negates any eligibility. The penalty for HCBS waiver recipients is the withholding of waiver services, the receipt of which is an eligibility requirement for that particular category. Unless the individual enters a nursing facility, the individual will remain ineligible. Upon entry into a nursing facility, the penalty period will begin and continue for the appropriate period of time.
Example: Ms. Jones applied for HCBS on 10-15-06 and was denied due to transfer of assets made on 6-1-06. The denial of waiver services prevents applying the penalty period. She then entered a nursing facility on November 14, 2006, and applied for Medicaid. The applicant was determined to be otherwise eligible except for the transfer of $55,000 for less than fair market value. The eligibility worker determined that the applicant is not eligible for Medicaid to pay the vendor payment for 14.469 months (55,000 divided by the divisor 3801). Ms. Jones will not be eligible for Medicaid to pay the vendor payment for long term care services until December 30, 2007.
Ms. Jones still can be approved for Medicaid services - just not the vendor payment. Ms Jones then leaves the nursing home on December 15, 2006. The penalty period continues to run even though Ms. Jones leaves the nursing facility. Once the penalty period expires ( 12-30-07), Ms. Jones could apply and, if otherwise eligible without regard to this transfer, be approved for the HCBS.
EXAMPLE: Ms. Jones application date for nursing home was 11-14-06 She transferred $55,000 after 2/8/06. $55,000 divided by 3801 equals 14.469. The 469 divided by 30 days equals 15.63333 days rounded up to 16 days. Do not round down. Ms. Jones will be ineligible for vendor payment until 12-30-07.
A transfer penalty spreadsheet is being added to ANSWER to compute the penalty period effective 10-1-06.
To ensure consistency with the decisions of what constitutes a hardship, applications (LTC and HCBS Waiver) for an undue hardship waiver will be routed to OPPD, Medicaid Eligibility Unit, Slot S333.
Example #1: Application dated March 10, 2009 revealed an uncompensated transfer occurred on January 24, 2006. Since the transfer was prior to 2/8/06, then the 36 month look-back period would apply. Applying the 36 month look-back from the application dated March 2009 would result in the transfer of 1/14/06 not being considered as the transfer occurred prior to the 36 months.
Example #2: Ms Jones applied on March 10, 2010 revealing an uncompensated transfer to her son that occurred on 4-10-06. This transfer will be considered because it is within the 60 month look-back period.
The eligibility worker will look at the dates of the transfers to determine whether to apply the penalty period based on pre-DRA policy or
DRA policy.
Example: Ms. Jones applied on March 10, 2007 revealing three uncompensated transfers. Transfers occurred January 14, 2006, March 1, 2006 and April 20, 2006. The eligibility worker will use pre-DRA policy for the transfer in January and will use the DRA provisions for the transfers that occurred after 2-8-06. Those two transfers ( 3-1-06 and 4-20-06 ) will be added together to arrive at the total DRA transfer amount.
NOTE: The home equity limit does not apply to individuals who applied and were determined eligible before January 1, 2006 and have no break in LTC eligibility after January 1, 2006. The limitation on home equity does not apply if the spouse of the individual, the individuals children under the age of 21 yrs old, or the individuals blind or disabled child is residing in the home.
The eligibility worker will determine the individual's equity interest in the home. This should be based solely on the current market value of the home, minus any encumbrances such as mortgages or other loans that are secured by the home. Refer to MS. 3331.4 on determining equity value.
This provision permits an individual to take out a home equity loan or reverse mortgage to reduce the total equity interest in the home converting the equity into an otherwise countable resource. The amount received from the loan has now been converted to a countable resource (e.g. Cash).
If an individual received a home equity loan which was greater than the resource limit, then he/she would be ineligible to receive LTC until the resources are reduced. If the individual gives this money away, this would be considered as an uncompensated transfer and the penalty period will be determined.
Example #1: Mr. Smith is applying for nursing home assistance. He has equity in the amount of $501,000 which exceeds the $500,000 home equity limit. He then converted $1000 into cash. Mr. Smith reports no other resources. His home equity is now within the accepted limits and his resources are below $2000. He is now eligible for long term care.
Example #2: Mr. Jones, an LTC applicant, has equity in his home of $550,000. He obtains a home equity loan of $50,000 reducing his equity to $500,000. He now meets the home equity limit but is ineligible due to countable resources of $50,000.
This provision also allows the individual to file an Undue Hardship Waiver. An example of a request may be the individual makes an allegation that the home equity should not be counted because of a legal impediment to selling or transferring the home. This will not prevent a determination of the individual's equity interest. However this may be a legitimate reason for applying for an undue hardship waiver. Undue hardship waiver will be forwarded to OPPD, Medicaid Eligibility Unit, Slot S333 with all supporting documentation.
All annuities will be routed to OPPD, Medicaid Eligibility Unit, Slot S333 for submission to the Office of Chief Counsel for determination. Based on OCC's opinion, OPPD will inform the eligibility worker whether this is a resource or is to be treated as a disposal of assets for less than fair market value.
If an applicant transfers assets while providing the appearance of a loan and documented as a promissory note, the funds will continue to be considered as an asset unless the following are met:
If less than one year of occupancy, the result would be in treatment as a transfer for less than fair market value and the penalty must be applied. The full amount of the purchase price will be considered as the uncompensated transfer.
If more than one year of occupancy, the eligibility worker will look at purchase price of the life estate to determine if the purchase price was for fair market value. If the person's life expectancy is less than the life estate purchased, this can be a basis to impose a transfer penalty.
This directive will be followed when processing any application pending on or taken on or after 10/1/06.
Remember:Asset transfers are dependent on the date of the transfer. See section II.A.1 for transfers prior to 2-8-06 Section II.A.2 for transfers after 2-8-06.
Medical Services Policy sections are being revised and will be issued within the next few months. This directive will remain in effect until that time.
Inquiries to: Judy Key, 682-8259
Carmen Banks, 682-8258 Carla Droughn, 682-8254 Dona Young, 682-1562
016.20.06 Ark. Code R. 004