On July 15, 1996, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in State of Arkansas v. Staton. Case No. 96-215, that the gross receipts from the sale of extended Service contracts covering motor vehicles were not subject to sales tax. This regulafion is-necessaiy in order to follow the ruling of the court. The provisions of this regulation will become effective on October 1, 1996. In the event that service contracts covering taxable services become subject to sales tax, this regulation shall become void.
Example A: Customer purchases an extended service contract covering only stated repairs to his motor vehicle. Customer does not pay sales tax on the consideration for the extended service contract. Mechanic makes repairs of $1,500 to customer's transmission and the repairs and parts used are covered under the extended service contract. The transmission repairs and parts are taxable regardless of whether the customer pays the mechanic or whether the mechanic receives payment under the extended service contract.
Example B: Customer purchases a service contract covering regular maintenance and repairs of his heating and cooling system. Customer paid sales tax on the consideration for the contract. Any additional payments received by the repair person for services or parts covered by the contract are not subject to sales tax. Any deductible amount, non-covered labor charges or parts are taxable.
Example C: Customer purchases a service contract for $750 from XYZ for the repair of his computer which he aiso purchased from XYZ. XYZ agrees to provide certain listed repairs and parts for a period of 3 years with no additional cost to the customer. The service contract is not taxable because it only provided for contingent repair services. When XYZ provides the listed repairs and parts, there is no sales tax due because XYZ does not receive any additional consideration as all future parts and repairs were paid for by customer at the time the contract was purchased.
FINDING OF IMMINENT PERIL AND STATEMENT OF REASONS
On July 15, 1996, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in State of Arkansas v. Staton, Case No. 9 6-215, that the gross receipts from the sale of extended service contracts covering motor vehicles were not subject to sales tax. This regulation is necessary in order to follow the ruling of the court and to implement the collection of-tax on taxable repair services. The decision of the Arkansas Supreme Court substantially alters the manner in which sales tax is applied to service contracts and repairs. Accordingly, there exists an imminent peril to the welfare of the State of Arkansas.
In order to ensure the understanding of and compliance with the decision of the court, this emergency regulation as authorized by Ark. Code Ann. § 26-15-204 is necessary. The provisions of this regulation will become effective on October 1, 1996.
006.05.96 Ark. Code R. 007